New developments in nucleic acid nanotechnology and protein scaffold designs have enabled unparalleled control over the spatial organization of synthetic multienzyme cascade reactions. One of the goals of these new technologies is to create nanostructured enzyme cascade reactions that promote substrate channeling along the cascade and, in doing so, enhance cascade catalysis. The concept of substrate channeling has a long and rich history in biochemistry and has established methods of evaluation and quantification. In this Perspective, we review the most common of these methods and discuss them in the context of engineered multienzyme systems and natural bifunctional enzymes with known mechanisms of substrate channeling. In addition, we use experimental data and the results of simulations of coupled-enzyme reactions to develop a set of preliminary design rules for engineering multienzyme nanostructures. The design rules address the limitations on interenzyme distance and active site orientation in substrate channeling and suggest designs for promoting enhanced catalysis, specifically, that enzyme orientation should minimize interenzyme distance and that at distances greater than 1 nm between active sites, significant channeling occurs only if diffusion of the intermediate is bounded through interactions with the surface or scaffold between active sites. This field is rapidly developing and promises to create many more new and exciting technologies.

BackgroundA key pathway for ester biosynthesis in yeast is the condensation of an alcohol with acetyl-CoA by alcohol-O-acetyltransferase (AATase). This pathway is also prevalent in fruit, producing short and medium chain volatile esters during ripening. In this work, a series of six AATases from Saccharomyces and non-Saccharomyces yeasts as well as tomato fruit were evaluated with respect to their activity, intracellular localization, and expression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Escherichia coli cell hosts. The series of AATases includes Atf1 and Atf2 from S. cerevisiae, as well as AATases from S. pastorianus, Kluyveromyces lactis, Pichia anomala, and Solanum lycopersicum (tomato).ResultsWhen expressed in S. cerevisiae, Atf1, Atf2, and an AATase from S. pastorianus localized to lipid droplets, while AATases from non-Saccharomyces yeasts and tomato fruit did not localize to intracellular membranes and were localized to the cytoplasm. All AATases studied here formed intracellular aggregates when expressed in E. coli, and western blot analysis revealed that expression levels in E. coli were upwards of 100-fold higher than in S. cerevisiae. Fermentation and whole cell lysate activity assays of the two most active AATases, Atf1 from S. cerevisiae and an AATase from tomato fruit, demonstrated that the aggregates were enzymatically active, but with highly reduced specific activity in comparison to activity in S. cerevisiae. Activity was partially recovered at lower expression levels, coinciding with smaller intracellular aggregates. In vivo and in vitro activity assays from heterologously expressed Atf1 from S. cerevisiae, which localizes to lipid droplets under homologous expression, demonstrates that its activity is not membrane dependent.ConclusionsThe results of these studies provide important information on the biochemistry of AATases under homologous and heterologous expression with two common microbial hosts for biochemical processes, S. cerevisiae and E. coli. All studied AATases formed aggregates with low enzymatic activity when expressed in E. coli and any membrane localization observed in S. cerevisiae was lost in E. coli. In addition, AATases that were found to localize to lipid droplet membranes in S. cerevisiae were found to not be membrane dependent with respect to activity.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12934-015-0221-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.