Summary Cross-modality interaction in sensory perception is advantageous for animals’ survival. How cortical sensory processing is cross-modally modulated and what are the underlying neural circuits remain poorly understood. In mouse primary visual cortex (V1), we discovered that orientation selectivity of layer (L)2/3 but not L4 excitatory neurons was sharpened in the presence of sound or optogenetic activation of projections from primary auditory cortex (A1) to V1. The effect was manifested by decreased average visual responses yet increased responses at the preferred orientation. It was more pronounced at lower visual contrast, and was diminished by suppressing L1 activity. L1 neurons were strongly innervated by A1-V1 axons and excited by sound, while visual responses of L2/3 vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) neurons were suppressed by sound, both preferentially at the cell's preferred orientation. These results suggest that the cross-modality modulation is achieved primarily through L1 neuron and L2/3 VIP-cell mediated inhibitory and disinhibitory circuits.

Recent success in identifying gene regulatory elements in the context of recombinant adeno-associated virus vectors have enabled cell type-restricted gene expression. However, within the cerebral cortex these tools are presently limited to broad classes of neurons. To overcome this limitation, we developed a strategy that led to the identification of multiple novel enhancers to target functionally distinct neuronal subtypes. By investigating the regulatory landscape of the disease gene Scn1a, we identified enhancers that target the breadth of its expression, including two that are selective for parvalbumin and vasoactive intestinal peptide cortical interneurons. Demonstrating the functional utility of these elements, we found that the PV-specific enhancer allowed for the selective targeting and manipulation of these neurons across species, from mice to humans. Finally, we demonstrate that our selection method is generalizable to other genes and characterize four additional PV-specific enhancers with exquisite specificity for distinct regions of the brain. Altogether, these viral tools can be used for cell-type specific circuit manipulation and hold considerable promise for use in therapeutic interventions.Large-scale transcriptomic studies are rapidly revealing where and when genes associated with neuropsychiatric disease are expressed within specific cell types (1-4). Approaches for understanding and treating these disorders will require methods for targeting and manipulating specific neuronal subtypes. Thus, gaining access to these populations in non-human primates and humans has become paramount. AAVs are the method of choice for gene delivery in the nervous system but have a limited genomic payload and are not intrinsically selective for particular neuronal populations (5). We and others have identified short regulatory elements capable of restricting viral expression to broad neuronal classes. In addition, systematic enhancer discovery has been accelerated by the recent development of technologies allowing for transcriptomic and epigenetic studies at single-cell resolution (6-12). Despite these advances, the search space for enhancer selection remains enormous and to date success has been limited. To focus our enhancer selection, we chose to specifically examine the regulatory landscape of Scn1a, a gene expressed in distinct neuronal populations and whose disruption is associated with severe epilepsy (13).Combining single-cell ATAC-seq data with sequence conservation across species, we nominated ten candidate regulatory sequences in the vicinity of this gene. By thoroughly investigating each of these elements for their ability to direct viral expression, we identified three enhancers that collectively target the breadth of neuronal populations expressing Scn1a. Among these, one particular short regulatory sequence was capable of restricting viral expression to parvalbumin-expressing cortical interneurons (PV cINs). To fully assess the utility of this element beyond reporter expression, we validated it in a v...

Neurons in thalamorecipient layers of sensory cortices integrate thalamocortical and intracortical inputs. Although their functional properties can be inherited from the convergence of thalamic inputs, the roles of intracortical circuits in thalamocortical transformation of sensory information remain unclear. Here, by reversibly silencing intracortical excitatory circuits with optogenetic activation of parvalbumin-positive inhibitory neurons in mouse primary visual cortex, we compared visually-evoked thalamocortical input with total excitation in the same layer 4 pyramidal neurons. We found that intracortical excitatory circuits preserve the orientation and direction tuning of thalamocortical excitation, with a linear amplification of thalamocortical signals by about threefold. The spatial receptive field of thalamocortical input is slightly elongated, and is expanded by intracortical excitation in an approximately proportional manner. Thus, intracortical excitatory circuits faithfully reinforce the representation of thalamocortical information, and may influence the size of the receptive field by recruiting additional inputs.

Defense against environmental threats is essential for animal survival. However, the neural circuits responsible for transforming unconditioned sensory stimuli and generating defensive behaviours remain largely unclear. Here, we show that corticofugal neurons in the auditory cortex (ACx) targeting the inferior colliculus (IC) mediate an innate, sound-induced flight behaviour. Optogenetic activation of these neurons, or their projection terminals in the IC, is sufficient for initiating flight responses, while the inhibition of these projections reduces sound-induced flight responses. Corticocollicular axons monosynaptically innervate neurons in the cortex of the IC (ICx), and optogenetic activation of the projections from the ICx to the dorsal periaqueductal gray is sufficient for provoking flight behaviours. Our results suggest that ACx can both amplify innate acoustic-motor responses and directly drive flight behaviours in the absence of sound input through corticocollicular projections to ICx. Such corticofugal control may be a general feature of innate defense circuits across sensory modalities.

Cortical inhibitory circuits play important roles in shaping sensory processing. In auditory cortex, however, functional properties of genetically identified inhibitory neurons are poorly characterized. By two-photon imaging-guided recordings, we specifically targeted 2 major types of cortical inhibitory neuron, parvalbumin (PV) and somatostatin (SOM) expressing neurons, in superficial layers of mouse auditory cortex. We found that PV cells exhibited broader tonal receptive fields with lower intensity thresholds and stronger tone-evoked spike responses compared with SOM neurons. The latter exhibited similar frequency selectivity as excitatory neurons. The broader/weaker frequency tuning of PV neurons was attributed to a broader range of synaptic inputs and stronger subthreshold responses elicited, which resulted in a higher efficiency in the conversion of input to output. In addition, onsets of both the input and spike responses of SOM neurons were significantly delayed compared with PV and excitatory cells. Our results suggest that PV and SOM neurons engage in auditory cortical circuits in different manners: while PV neurons may provide broadly tuned feedforward inhibition for a rapid control of ascending inputs to excitatory neurons, the delayed and more selective inhibition from SOM neurons may provide a specific modulation of feedback inputs on their distal dendrites.

No abstract

Orientation selectivity (OS) in the visual cortex has been found to be invariant to increases in stimulus contrast, a finding that cannot be accounted for by the original, purely excitatory Hubel and Wiesel model. This property of OS may be important for preserving the quality of perceived stimulus across a range of stimulus intensity. The synaptic mechanisms that can prevent a broadening of OS caused by contrast-dependent strengthening of excitatory inputs to cortical neurons remain unknown. Using in vivo loose-patch recordings, we found in excitatory neurons in layer 4 of mouse primary visual cortex (V1) that the spike response to the preferred orientation was elevated as contrast increased while that to the orthogonal orientation remained unchanged, resulting in an overall sharpening rather than a weakening of OS. Whole-cell voltage-clamp recordings further revealed that contrast increases resulted in a scaling up of excitatory conductance at all stimulus orientations. Inhibitory conductance was enhanced at a similar level as excitation for the preferred orientation, but at a significantly higher level for the orthogonal orientation. Modelling revealed that the resulting broadening of inhibitory tuning is critical for maintaining and sharpening OS at high contrast. Finally, two-photon imaging guided recordings from parvalbumin-positive (PV) inhibitory neurons revealed that the broadening of inhibition can be attributed to a contrast-dependent broadening of spike response tuning of PV neurons. Together our results suggest that modulation of synaptic inhibition in the mouse V1 cortical circuit preserves the sharpness of response selectivity during changes of stimulus strength.

Despite accounting for about 20% of all the layer 2/3 inhibitory interneurons, the vasoactive intestinal polypeptide (VIP) expressing neurons remain the least thoroughly studied of the major inhibitory subtypes. In recent studies, VIP neurons have been shown to be activated by a variety of cortico-cortical and neuromodulatory inputs, but their basic sensory response properties remain poorly characterized. We set out to explore the functional properties of layer 2/3 VIP neurons in the primary visual (V1) and primary auditory cortex (A1), using two-photon imaging guided patch recordings. We found that in the V1, VIP neurons were generally broadly tuned, with their sensory response properties resembling those of parvalbumin (PV) expressing neurons. With the exception of response latency, they did not exhibit a significant difference from PV neurons across any of the properties tested, including overlap index, response modulation, orientation selectivity, and direction selectivity. In the A1, on the other hand, VIP neurons had a strong tendency to be intensity selective, which is a property associated with a subset of putative pyramidal cells and virtually absent in PV neurons. VIP neurons had a best intensity that was significantly lower than that of PV and putative pyramidal neurons. Finally, sensory evoked spike responses of VIP neurons were delayed relative to pyramidal and PV neurons in both the V1 and A1. Combined, these results demonstrate that the sensory response properties of VIP neurons do not fit a simple model of being either PV-like broadly tuned or pyramidal-like narrowly tuned. Instead, the selectivity pattern varies with sensory area and can even be, as in the case of low sound intensity responsiveness, distinct from both PV and pyramidal neurons.