No abstract

No abstract

The aim of the study was to investigate the prevalence and risk factors of diabetes mellitus (DM) in primary aldosteronism (PA) patients.Methods: This case-control study enrolled 259 PA patients in West China Hospital, China from January 2016 to January 2019. Patients were divided into three groups: PA group, PA + impaired fasting glucose (IFG)/impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) group and PA + DM group. Clinical characteristics (like age and sex) and laboratory variables (like plasma aldosterone concentration and plasma renin activity) were compared between three groups. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to determine risk factors for DM in PA patients. The association of random blood glucose with the above-mentioned factors were also investigated by Pearson correlation analyses. Nomogram model was developed to predict the probability of DM in PA patients.Results: 49 (18.9%) patients were diagnosed with DM and 22 (8.5%) with IFG/IGT in 259 PA patients. Apart from older age, male, higher body mass index, higher triglycerides and lower cholesterol, we found that higher blood urea nitrogen (BUN) and higher 24 h urinary calcium (Ca) might be potential new risk factors for dysglycemia. The nomogram model for DM in PA patients had a good predictive accuracy, with the area under the curve of receiver operating characteristic of 0.839 (95% CI 0.784-0.893).Conclusions: PA patients were more likely to have DM compared with general population. Apart from older age, overweight and dyslipidemia, higher BUN and excessive excretion of urinary Ca may also be the new potential risk factors for DM in PA patients.

No abstract

BackgroundThis meta-analysis aimed to compare the efficacy of artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) and slings for the treatment of moderate male stress urinary incontinence (SUI) based on existing data.MethodsThe study was in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis. We searched the widely acknowledged database including PubMed, Embase (Ovid version), Medline (Ovid version), and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (till February 2021). Male patients with moderate SUI who underwent AUS or slings procedure over 18 years old and had been monitored with a mean follow-up time of at least 12 months were included. The primary outcome was success rate defined as daily pad use with 0–1 pad/d postoperatively. Articles with congruent outcomes were suitable for inclusion. The secondary outcome included complication rate of infection, erosion, acute urinary retention, and surgical revision.ResultsFive studies with a total of 509 patients (295 for slings and 214 for AUS) were recruited. The success rate was higher in AUS with an odds ratio (OR) = 0.57 (95% CI: 0.36–0.90). As for the overall complication rate, no significant difference was discovered between slings and AUS groups (OR = 1.06, 95% CI: 0.58–1.92, P = 0.86).ConclusionTo conclude, AUS was better than slings for moderate male SUI treatment according to daily pad use with an acceptable complication rate. The slings also had clinical value and were options when aging male patients were AUS naive and refused inserted mechanical devices. High-quality pieces of evidence are needed to confirm the efficacy of AUS and slings in moderate male SUI.Systematic Review Registration:https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=271203, identifier: CRD42021271203.