No abstract

For rodents that live underground, digging in highly compacted soils requires a higher energy expenditure than digging in poorly compacted soils. We tested how soil hardness affects the bite force as well as the shape and size of the skulls and mandibles of tuco-tucos. Our hypothesis is that species that inhabit harder soils would show a stronger bite force, which should be reflected in the shape of the skull and mandible, while species living in softer soils should have a weaker bite force. We used 24 species of the genus Ctenomys to estimate bite force (through the incisor strength formula) and quantify the shape and size of the skull and mandible. Information on soil bulk density in the regions occupied by each species was obtained from the literature. We used a combination of geometric morphometric and comparative methods to test our hypothesis. A phylogenetic linear regression (PGLS) between bite force (N) and centroid size was used to account for the dependence of bite force on size. We employed a series of two-block partial leastsquares analyses to uncover the covariation between bite force and the shape of the skull and mandible. Finally, we ran five independent PGLS analyses to assess the influence of bulk density on bite force, skull shape and mandible shape, taking into account phylogenetic non-independence. Species with higher bite forces tend to inhabit more-compact soils. However, for most species, the relationship between bite force and soil bulk density was unclear, resulting in a low overall correlation. Nonetheless, differences in skull and mandible shapes were generally associated with bite force (r = 0.60). In denser soils, species with high and low bite forces occur, whereas in lower density soils, we found only species with weak bite forces. Differences in the excavation strategies among species may be responsible for this pattern.

Jorge c. pereira 5 , edivaldo Herculano corrêa de oliveira 6,7 , Malcolm A. ferguson-Smith 5 & thales Renato ochotorena de freitas 1,2,3 Reproductive compatibility usually decreases according to increasing genetic difference and the time of divergence between species. However, the amount of modification required to influence hybridization may vary in different species. Thus, it is extremely important to conduct studies that seek to understand what and how variables influence the reproductive isolation of species. We have explored a system involving two species of subterranean rodents that present morphological, karyotypic, and evolutionary history differences and are capable of generating hybrids. To gain insight into the karyotype organization of genus Ctenomys, we examined the chromosome evolution by classical and molecular cytogenetics of both parental species and hybrids. Furthermore, we have used different approaches to analyze the differences between the parental species and the hybrids, and determined the origin of the hybrids. The results of our work demonstrate unequivocally that some species that present extensive differences in chromosome organization, phenotype, evolutionary history, sperm morphology and genetic, which are usually associated with reproductive isolation, can generate natural hybrids. the results also demonstrate that females of both species are able to generate hybrids with males of the other species. In addition, the chromosome-specific probes prepared from Ctenomys flamarioni provide an invaluable tool for comparative cytogenetics in closely related species.

No abstract