Obstructive sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome (OSAHS) is characterized by successive episodes of cessation or decrease in respiratory airflow, in which obesity is an important risk factor. The prevalence of the disease in morbidly obese patients is approximately 70%. Treatment is based on the use of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) and weight loss in obese patients. Weight loss by dieting often produces unsatisfactory results, and the use of CPAP does not show good adherence because of being long-term and uncomfortable. Bariatric surgery has emerged as the treatment for morbid obesity and various associated co-morbidities. This article reviews the principal studies that evaluate the modifications in obstructive sleep apnea after bariatric surgery, showing that surgery is an effective treatment for the management of OSAHS in morbidly obese patients.

The pharmacological management of asthma has changed considerably in recent decades, as it has come to be understood that it is a complex, heterogeneous disease with different phenotypes and endotypes. It is now clear that the goal of asthma treatment should be to achieve and maintain control of the disease, as well as to minimize the risks (of exacerbations, disease instability, accelerated loss of lung function, and adverse treatment effects). That requires an approach that is personalized in terms of the pharmacological treatment, patient education, written action plan, training in correct inhaler use, and review of the inhaler technique at each office visit. A panel of 22 pulmonologists was invited to perform a critical review of recent evidence of pharmacological treatment of asthma and to prepare this set of recommendations, a treatment guide tailored to use in Brazil. The topics or questions related to the most significant changes in concepts, and consequently in the management of asthma in clinical practice, were chosen by a panel of experts. To formulate these recommendations, we asked each expert to perform a critical review of a topic or to respond to a question, on the basis of evidence in the literature. In a second phase, three experts discussed and structured all texts submitted by the others. That was followed by a third phase, in which all of the experts reviewed and discussed each recommendation. These recommendations, which are intended for physicians involved in the treatment of asthma, apply to asthma patients of all ages.

The use of PET/CT imaging in the work-up and management of patients with lung cancer has greatly increased in recent decades. The ability to combine functional and anatomical information has equipped PET/CT to look into various aspects of lung cancer, allowing more precise disease staging and providing useful data during the characterization of indeterminate pulmonary nodules. In addition, the accuracy of PET/CT has been shown to be greater than is that of conventional modalities in some scenarios, making PET/CT a valuable noninvasive method for the investigation of lung cancer. However, the interpretation of PET/CT findings presents numerous pitfalls and potential confounders. Therefore, it is imperative for pulmonologists and radiologists to familiarize themselves with the most relevant indications for and limitations of PET/CT, seeking to protect their patients from unnecessary radiation exposure and inappropriate treatment. This review article aimed to summarize the basic principles, indications, cancer staging considerations, and future applications related to the use of PET/CT in lung cancer.

The collection of exhaled breath condensates (EBC) is a noninvasive method for obtaining samples from the lungs. Eicosanoids are lipid mediators implicated in the asthmatic inflammatory response. The objective of our study was to investigate whether the profile of eicosanoid lipid mediators in EBC can characterize the inflammation in asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). EBC samples were collected from 22 healthy controls (C), 25 mild intermittent asthmatics (MIA), 20 with moderate to severe asthma (MSA) and 20 with moderate to severe COPD. EBC samples were analyzed by unique tandem mass spectrometry that allows the quantification of up to 25 eicosanoid mediators simultaneously. No differences were found between MIA and C. Subjects with MSA and COPD had higher levels of 6-keto, PGE2, LTB4, 11-12 EET and AA, while lower levels of LXA4, 11DHyTxB2, 11HETE and 8,9EET, when compared to MSA and C (p < 0.05). Our study shows that the analysis of EBC through mass spectrometry is mixed and has a similar response in MSA and COPD when compared to MIA and controls.

Introduction Different therapies are currently used, considered, or proposed for the treatment of COVID-19; for many of those therapies, no appropriate assessment of effectiveness and safety was performed. This document aims to provide scientifically available evidence-based information in a transparent interpretation, to subsidize decisions related to the pharmacological therapy of COVID-19 in Brazil. Methods A group of 27 experts and methodologists integrated a task-force formed by professionals from the Brazilian Association of Intensive Care Medicine ( Associação de Medicina Intensiva Brasileira - AMIB), the Brazilian Society of Infectious Diseases ( Sociedad Brasileira de Infectologia - SBI) and the Brazilian Society of Pulmonology and Tisiology ( Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisiologia - SBPT). Rapid systematic reviews, updated on April 28, 2020, were conducted. The assessment of the quality of evidence and the development of recommendations followed the GRADE system. The recommendations were written on May 5, 8, and 13, 2020. Results Eleven recommendations were issued based on low or very-low level evidence. We do not recommend the routine use of hydroxychloroquine, chloroquine, azithromycin, lopinavir/ritonavir, corticosteroids, or tocilizumab for the treatment of COVID-19. Prophylactic heparin should be used in hospitalized patients, however, no anticoagulation should be provided for patients without a specific clinical indication. Antibiotics and oseltamivir should only be considered for patients with suspected bacterial or influenza coinfection, respectively. Conclusion So far no pharmacological intervention was proven effective and safe to warrant its use in the routine treatment of COVID-19 patients; therefore such patients should ideally be treated in the context of clinical trials. The recommendations herein provided will be revised continuously aiming to capture newly generated evidence.

Background: Weight loss has been shown effective in the treatment of the obstructive sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome. Regrettably, many obese patients are unable to achieve sustained and useful weight loss by dietary means. Recently, bariatric surgery has emerged as an alternative to treat obesity and many of its comorbidities, although its role for sleep apnea treatment is still not defined. Objectives: To evaluate the impact of bariatric surgery on obstructive sleep apnea in morbidly obese patients. Methods: In this cohort study, polysomnography, Epworth Sleepiness Scale questionnaire and clinical assessment were performed in 12 of 13 morbidly obese patients with moderate to severe obstructive sleep apnea treated with bariatric surgery through Roux-en-Y gastric bypass procedure after a minimum of 18 months post surgery. Results: The mean (±SD) loss of excess body weight was 70.5 ± 24%. The mean level obtained in the Epworth Scale was 4.8. There was a significant reduction in the apnea-hypopnea index, from a median of 46.5 (range: 33–140) to 16 (range: 0.9–87) events per hour (p < 0.05), an improvement in mean oxygen saturation from 85.7 ± 5.1 to 94.5 ± 3.6% (p < 0.05) and in minimum oxygen saturation from 64.7 ± 13.4 to 78.7 ± 13.7% (p < 0.05). The magnitude of the weight loss and the improvements in mean and minimum oxygen saturation were positively correlated, (r = 0.76; p ≤ 0.05, and r = 0.59; p ≤ 0.05, respectively). Conclusions: Weight loss achieved by bariatric surgery is associated with significant long-term improvements in obstructive respiratory event, oxygenation and resolution of daytime somnolence.

Leukotriene receptor antagonists administered systemically might decrease small airway/alveolar sites of inflammation when combined to inhaled corticosteroid therapy.

Ninety-one Helicobacter pylori-positive patients with nonulcer dyspepsia were randomized to receive either lansoprazole, amoxicillin, and clarithromycin or lansoprazole and placebo. A validated questionnaire assessed dyspeptic symptoms at baseline and at 3, 6, and 12 months. Endoscopies and biopsies were performed at baseline and at 3 and 12 months. There was an overall trend, although not statistically significant, for a benefit of H. pylori eradication. Of the patients in the antibiotics group, 16 of 46 (35%) had symptomatic improvement, versus 9 of 43 (21%) in the control group (P = 0.164). In a secondary analysis, it was found that of the patients without endoscopic gastric erosions, 15 of 34 (44%) in the antibiotics group and 5 of 33 (15%) of controls had symptomatic improvement (P = 0.015). Helicobacter pylori eradication did not prove to be clinically beneficial, although a tendency to symptomatic benefit was detected. Further studies are necessary to confirm the implications of endoscopic gastric erosions in these patients.