Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most commonly diagnosed malignancy among western men and accounts for the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths. PCa tends to grow slowly and recent studies suggest that it relies on lipid fuel more than on aerobic glycolysis. However, the biochemical mechanisms governing the relationships between lipid synthesis, lipid utilization, and cancer growth remain unknown. To address the role of lipid metabolism in PCa we have used Etomoxir and Orlistat, clinically safe drugs that block lipid oxidation and lipid synthesis/lipolysis, respectively. Etomoxir is an irreversible inhibitor of the carnitine palmitoyltransferase (CPT1) enzyme that decreases beta oxidation in the mitochondria. Combinatorial treatments using Etomoxir and Orlistat resulted in synergistic decreased viability in LNCaP, VCaP and patient-derived benign and PCa cells. These effects were associated with decreased androgen receptor (AR) expression, decreased mammalian target of Rapamycin (mTOR) signaling and increased caspase-3 activation. Knockdown of CPT1A enzyme in LNCaP cells resulted in decreased palmitate oxidation but increased sensitivity to Etomoxir, with inactivation of AKT kinase and activation of caspase-3. Systemic treatment with Etomoxir in nude nice resulted in decreased xenograft growth over 21 days, underscoring the therapeutic potential of blocking lipid catabolism to decrease PCa tumor growth.

No abstract

Prostate cancer (CaP) subtypes are poorly defined and functional validation of drivers of ETS rearrangement-negative CaP has not been conducted. Here, we identified an ETS− subtype of aggressive CaP (ERG−MAP3K7delCHD1del) and used a novel developmental model and a cell line xenograft model to show that co-suppression of MAP3K7 and CHD1 expression promotes aggressive disease. Analyses of publicly available CaP datasets revealed that MAP3K7 and CHD1 were significantly co-deleted in 10–20% of localized tumors and combined loss correlated with poor disease-free survival. To evaluate the functional impact of dual MAP3K7-CHD1 loss, we suppressed Map3k7 and/or Chd1 expression in mouse prostate epithelial progenitor/stem cells (PrP/SCs) and performed tissue recombination experiments in vivo. Dual shMap3k7-shChd1 PrP/SC recombinants displayed massive glandular atypia with regions of prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN) and carcinoma apparent. Combined Map3k7-Chd1 suppression greatly disrupted normal prostatic lineage differentiation; dual recombinants displayed significant AR loss, increased neuroendocrine differentiation, and increased neural differentiation. Clinical samples with dual MAP3K7-CHD1 loss also displayed neuroendocrine and neural characteristics. Additionally, dual Map3k7-Chd1 suppression promoted E-cadherin loss and mucin production in recombinants. MAP3K7 and CHD1 protein loss also correlated with Gleason grade and E-cadherin loss in clinical samples. To further validate the phenotype observed in the PrP/SC model, we suppressed MAP3K7 and/or CHD1 expression in LNCaP prostate cancer cells. Dual shMAP3K7-shCHD1 LNCaP xenografts displayed increased tumor growth and decreased survival compared to shControl, shMAP3K7, and shCHD1 xenografts. Collectively, these data identify coordinate loss of MAP3K7 and CHD1 as a unique driver of aggressive CaP development.

p21-Activated serine-threonine kinase (PAK1) is implicated in breast cancer. We have shown previously that PAK1 is tyrosyl phosphorylated by prolactin (PRL)-activated Janus tyrosine kinase (JAK2). Although a role for both PRL and PAK1 in breast cancer is widely acknowledged, the mechanism remains poorly understood. In the present study, PRL-activated PAK1 stimulates the invasion of TMX2-28 human breast cancer cells through Matrigel. Three-dimensional (3D) collagen IV stimulates the secretion of the matrix proteases, metalloproteinase (MMP)-1 and -3 that is further enhanced by the PRL-dependent tyrosyl phosphorylation of PAK1. 3D collagen IV also stimulates the expression and secretion of MMP-2, but in contrast to MMP-1 and -3, PRL/PAK1 signaling down-regulates MMP-2 expression and secretion. In contrast, MMP-9 expression and secretion are stimulated by 3D collagen I, not collagen IV, and are not affected by PRL but are down-regulated by PAK1. MMP-1 and -3 are required and MMP-2 contributes to PRL-dependent invasion. ERK1/2 signaling appears to be required for the enhanced expression and secretion of MMP-1 and -3 and enhanced PRL-dependent invasion. p38 MAPK and c-Jun N-terminal kinase 1/2 pathways participate in production of MMP-1 and -3 as well as in PRL/PAK1-dependent cell invasion. Together, these data illustrate the complex interaction between the substratum and PRL/PAK1 signaling in human breast cancer cells and suggest a pivotal role for PRL-dependent PAK1 tyrosyl phosphorylation in MMP secretion.

The p21-activated serine-threonine kinase (PAK1) is activated by small GTPase-dependent and -independent mechanisms and regulates cell motility. Both PAK1 and the hormone prolactin (PRL) have been implicated in breast cancer by numerous studies. We have previously shown that the PRL-activated tyrosine kinase JAK2 (Janus tyrosine kinase 2) phosphorylates PAK1 in vivo and identified tyrosines (Tyr) 153, 201, and 285 in the PAK1 molecule as sites of JAK2 tyrosyl phosphorylation. Here, we have used human breast cancer T47D cells stably overexpressing PAK1 wild type or PAK1 Y3F mutant in which Tyr(s) 153, 201, and 285 were mutated to phenylalanines to demonstrate that phosphorylation of these three tyrosines are required for maximal PRL-dependent ruffling. In addition, phosphorylation of these three tyrosines is required for increased migration of T47D cells in response to PRL as assessed by two independent motility assays. Finally, we show that PAK1 phosphorylates serine (Ser) 2152 of the actin-binding protein filamin A to a greater extent when PAK1 is tyrosyl phosphorylated by JAK2. Down-regulation of PAK1 or filamin A abolishes the effect of PRL on cell migration. Thus, our data presented here bring some insight into the mechanism of PRL-stimulated motility of breast cancer cells.

No abstract

The serine-threonine kinase PAK1 is activated by small GTPase-dependent and -independent mechanisms and promotes cell survival. However, the role of tyrosyl phosphorylation in the regulation of PAK1 function is poorly understood. In this study, we have shown that the prolactin-activated tyrosine kinase JAK2 phosphorylates PAK1 in vivo. Wild type, but not kinase-dead, JAK2 directly phosphorylates PAK1 in cells and in an in vitro kinase assay. PAK1 tyrosines 153, 201, and 285 were identified as sites of JAK2 tyrosyl phosphorylation by mass spectrometry and two-dimensional peptide mapping. Mutation of PAK1 tyrosines 153, 201, and 285 to phenylalanines individually or in combination implicated these PAK1 tyrosines in the regulation of PAK1 kinase activity. Tyrosyl phosphorylation by JAK2 significantly increases PAK1 kinase activity, whereas similar phosphorylation of the PAK1 Y153F,Y201F,Y285F mutant has no effect on PAK1 activity. Tyrosyl phosphorylation of wild type PAK1 decreases apoptosis induced by serum deprivation and staurosporine treatment and increases cell motility. In contrast, these parameters are unaltered in the PAK1 Y153F,Y201F,Y285F mutant. Our findings indicate that JAK2 phosphorylates PAK1 at these specific tyrosines and that this phosphorylation plays an important role in cell survival and motility. PAK14 is a member of a conserved family of p21-activated serine-threonine kinases and is important for a variety of cellular functions, including cell morphogenesis, motility, survival, mitosis, and malignant transformation (for review see Refs. 1-3). The emerging roles of PAK1 in the regulation of multiple fundamental cellular processes have directed significant attention toward understanding how PAK1 activity is controlled. Autoinhibition of the PAK1 C-terminal catalytic domain by the N-terminal domain is a key mechanism of PAK1 regulation. Several layers of inhibition, involving dimerization and occupation of the catalytic cleft by contact between the Nand C-terminal domains, keep PAK1 kinase activity in check (4). Autoinhibition of PAK1 occurs in trans, meaning that the inhibitory domain of one PAK1 molecule interacts with the kinase domain of another PAK1 molecule (5). Association of GTP-bound forms of Cdc42 and Rac1 with the PAK1 PBD/ CRIB domain induces conformational changes in the N-terminal domain that no longer support its autoinhibitory function. In addition to Cdc42 and Rac1, PAK1 is activated by the binding of small GTPases, Rac2 and Rac3, as well as TC10, CHP, and Wrich-1 proteins (6 -11). PAK1 is a predominantly cytoplasmic protein, but is activated upon recruitment to the cell membrane. PAK1 membrane localization occurs through interaction with adaptor proteins Nck, Grb2, and PIX, all of which are activated by ligation of growth factor receptors (12-15). Membrane recruitment of PAK1 via adapter proteins and subsequent PAK1 activation may involve phosphorylation at Thr 423 (a site that is also autophosphorylated when PAK1 is activated by Rac1 and Cdc42) by PDK1 (16) or interaction with...

The Src homology 2 (SH2) domain-containing adapter protein SH2B1beta plays a role in severe obesity, leptin and insulin resistance, and infertility. SH2B1beta was initially identified as a Janus tyrosine kinase 2 (JAK2) substrate, and it has been implicated in cell motility and regulation of the actin rearrangement in response to GH and platelet-derived growth factor. SH2B1beta is also required for maximal actin-based motility of Listeria. Here we have used a low-speed pelleting assay and electron microscopy to demonstrate that SH2B1beta has two actin-binding sites and that it cross-links actin filaments in vitro. Wild-type SH2B1beta localized to cell ruffles and along filopodia, but deletion of amino acids 150-200 (the first actin-binding site) led to mislocalization of the protein to filopodia tip complexes where it colocalized with vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein (VASP). Based on studies performed in VASP-deficient MVD7(-/-) cells, with or without green fluorescent protein-VASP reconstitution, we concluded that the proper intracellular localization of native SH2B1beta required the presence of the first SH2B1beta actin-binding site and VASP. Finally, we found that both SH2B1beta actin-binding domains were required for maximal GH- and prolactin-induced cell ruffling. Together, these results suggest that SH2B1beta functions as an adapter protein that cross-links actin filaments, leading to modulation of cellular responses in response to JAK2 activation.