Background/Aim: Several clinical conditions seriously hamper the diagnostic accuracy of the commonly used tests for Helicobacter pylori (Hp), 13 C-urea breath test (UBT) and stool antigen test (SAT). The present communication is a critical review of the potential limitations of UBT and SAT, and describes the approach on how these can be avoided. Drawbacks of the Hp tests: False-negative results are most often due to low bacterial load in the stomach due to: i) use of proton pump inhibitor medication; ii) use of antibiotics; iii) presence of atrophic gastritis and hypoacid stomach; iv); bleeding peptic ulcer; v) gastric cancer (GC) and vi) mucosal-associated lymphatic tissue lymphoma. The UBT also gives false-positive results when urease-producing bacterial species, other than Hp colonize an acid-free stomach. Importantly, neither UBT nor SAT are capable of 1091 This article is freely accessible online.

Background/Aim: The aim of the present study was to compare fecal immunochemical tests (FITs) for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening with the traditional guaiac-based FOB tests (gFOBT). Materials and Methods: A cohort of 368 colonoscopy-referral patients were evaluated by i) the new-generation FIT: ColonView quick test (CV; Biohit Oyj, Finland) and ii) a conventional gFOBT HemoccultSENSA (HS; Beckman Coulter, USA). Three fecal samples were requested for both assays, and all subjects underwent diagnostic colonoscopy with biopsy confirmation. Sensitivity (SE), specificity (SP), positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and area under curve (AUC) were calculated for both tests using three endpoints: adenoma (A), advanced adenoma (AA) and adenocarcinoma (AC). Results: Colonoscopy and biopsies disclosed normal mucosa in 90/378 (24.5%) subjects, early A in 108/368 (29.3%) cases, AA in 48/368 (13.0%) and AC in 37/368 (10.1%), and non-neoplastic conditions in the remaining 85 (30.3%). For the AC endpoint, the CV (Hb/Hp) test had 94.6% SE and 65.1% SP (AUC=0.799), while the HS test had SE of 75.7% and SP of 84.3% (AUC=0.800). For the A endpoint, the difference between CV and HS was even more pronounced; SE of 44.2% and 19.2%, respectively (p<0.0001). Hb and Hb/Hp complex of the CV test showed equal performance for all endpoints. Conclusion: Sensitivity (94.6%) of the ColonView quick test for the most reproducible endpoint (invasive CRC) far exceeded the pooled sensitivity (79%) estimated in a recent meta-analysis for 8 common FIT brands. As shown in a previous study, ColonView quick test is superior in SE to HemoccultSENSA test, making CV a perfect FIT for organized CRC screening. Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common malignancy, with over 1.3 million new cases and over 600.000 annual deaths worldwide in 2012 (1). In Brazil, the incidence of CRC remains lower than in many high-income countries, but mortality is similar, reflecting an incidence-tomortality ratio disparity in Brazil (2-4). CRC is readily suitable for organized screening, offering a possibility for both early detection and cancer prevention, with reduced mortality rates (5, 6). The majority of CRC develops from precursor lesions, i.e., adenoma, and several studies have estimated the accuracy of screening methods also for advanced adenomas. Effective CRC screening can achieve both the primary and secondary prevention, by detecting cancer precursors (polyps, adenomas) and early cancers, respectively (7, 8).

No abstract

This study shows that advanced ACG is a common disease among Finnish adults, and remains to be undiagnosed in most under the current healthcare practice. The biomarker test shows high feasibility and acceptance among the general public, and is simple to perform even in "field" conditions.

No abstract