Purpose The aim of this study was to evidence trends and changes in mortality, comorbid conditions, prognosis, and causes of death after 5 years of continuous evolution of hemodialysis (HD) patients in Romania. Methods We included two cohorts of stable HD patients (901 from 2012 and 1396 from 2017). Both cohorts were followed up for 1 year. The 5-year survivors of the 2012 cohort were identified in 2017 and their data changes were assessed. Results The 2017 patients were older, with longer time on dialysis, higher serum creatinine and urea levels, and required higher ultrafiltration volume per dialysis. They also had lower hemoglobin, lower C-reactive protein, higher albumin, higher calcium bicarbonate, and higher parathyroidectomy prevalence. The 2017 cohort presented with lower average dialysis flow, less administration of iron sucrose, had more catheters, lower hepatitis C prevalence, higher diabetes mellitus prevalence, higher heart valve calcifications, higher heart rate disorders, higher prevalence of left ventricular hypertrophy, and lower ejection fraction. Cardiovascular disease was the main cause of death in both years (50% in 2012 and 45.6% in 2017), followed by sepsis and cancer. The mortality was higher in 2017 compared to 2012 (14.1 vs 6.6%). The 5-year mortality was 37.2% with an average of 7.44%/year. The risk of death increased with age, higher C-reactive protein, higher phosphate, lower hemoglobin, and lower albumin. Conclusion Cardiovascular disease remains the main causes of death in HD-treated patients but with decreasing trend. Developing regional therapeutic strategies for quality care with early intervention will most likely improve mortality.
Left ventricular (LV) structure and function anomalies are frequent during the CKD continuum and are associated with increased risk of mortality. Cross section and longitudinal ultrasound data are available for advanced CKD and transition to ESKD. Less information is available about LV changes during stable, long-term hemodialysis (HD) treatment. All stable HD patients from 9 HD centers (1034 patients, 671 males, age 58.71 ± 12.94 years) have been enrolled in January 2015. The cohort was followed-up for 4 years, kidney transplantation or death. Yearly, two-dimensional and M-mode continuous and Pulse Doppler echocardiography were performed. During the follow-up, the prevalence of cardiovascular comorbidities significantly increased (p < 0.0001), coronary artery disease (CAD) from 73.5 to 88.8%, peripheral artery disease (PAD) from 29 to 40.9%, cerebral vascular disease (CVD) from 20.4 to 30.8%, heart valves calcification (VC) from 65.6 to 89.3% and left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) from 67.6 to 76.5%. The mortality risk increased with the presence of CAD (1.59-fold), PAD (1.61-fold), CVD (1.59-fold), and VC (1.77-fold). Mortality risk was increased in those with LVEF < 50% (LVEF 40–49% 1.5-fold and LVEF < 40% 2.3 fold). Among the survivors of the first year, LVEF varied (> 5% decrease, > 5% increase and ± 5% variations). More than 5% increase of LVEF was associated with higher mortality risk (crude 1.5-fold, adjusted 1.43-fold) compared to stationary EF (p = 0.001). Cardiovascular disease progresses during stable long-term HD therapy and increases mortality risk. HF becomes highly prevalent but only HF with decreased LVEF < 50% is associated with increased risk of mortality.
Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) represent a special category of risk. As part of the renal and cardiovascular continuum from risk factors to end stage diseases, they develop clinical syndromes with potentially severe prognosis. Patients on dialysis have severe cardiac risk, have a peculiar hyperlipemic profile with intense atherogenic effect, phosphocalcic metabolic alterations and thus a higher rate of development of atheroma and degenerative valve diseases. They have higher cardiovascular mortality and morbidity being potential candidates for aggressive reduction of risk factors. Dialysate patients are exposed to higher risk of ischemic and arrhythmic events. Echocardiographic assessment of these patients is extremely important in risk stratification and treatment strategy in order to improve prognosis. Drugs proved to improve cardiac remodeling, reduce hypertrophy and LV mass and enhance ejection fraction, improved prognosis.
Introduction Kidney dysfunction is prevalent in oncology patients and has an impact on their treatment and quality of life. The aim of our study was to analyze the prevalence of CKD in a large cohort of several types of cancer patients in an East European Region. Material and methods We conducted an observational retrospective cohort study on 5831 consecutive, biopsy-diagnosed cancer patients between January 2019 –December 2020 in the largest oncology hospital and outpatient clinic in Western Romania. 4342 subjects were included in the statistical analysis. Results and discussion From the 24 cancer types, the most prevalent cancers were represented by: breast (22.02%), lung (10.18%) and colonic cancer (9.51%). The prevalence of CKD (G3 –G5) was 12.27% after the first year of follow-up and 13.42 after the second year. The prevalence of CKD was higher in patients with renal (50%), urinary tract (33.6%) and pancreatic cancers (19.6%) and lower in patients with colonic cancers (5.3%) and brain tumors (2.5%). At the end of our 2-year survey period, 0,7% of the CKD cases had an eGFR around 6 ml/min/1.73m2 –an indication for renal replacement therapy. Conclusion Oncology patients have a significantly higher prevalence of CKD compared to the general population, dependent of the age of the patients and the type of cancer. The prevalence of advanced CKD was surprisingly high (stages G4-G5 Pre-Dialysis 22.15%) one third of the CKD- G5 patients having indication for initiation of renal replacement therapy. An onco- nephrology team should be needed for the best medical care of these patients.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.