No abstract

The intasome is the basic recombination unit of retroviral integration, comprising the integrase protein and the ends of the viral DNA made by reverse transcription. Clinical inhibitors preferentially target the DNA-bound form of integrase as compared with the free protein, highlighting the critical requirement for detailed understanding of HIV-1 intasome structure and function. Although previous biochemical studies identified integrase residues that contact the DNA, structural details of protein-protein and protein-DNA interactions within the functional intasome were lacking. The recent crystal structure of the prototype foamy virus (PFV) integrase-viral DNA complex revealed numerous details of this related integration machine. Structures of drug-bound PFV intasomes moreover elucidated the mechanism of inhibitor action. Herein we present a model for the HIV-1 intasome assembled using the PFV structure as template. Our results pinpoint previously identified protein-DNA contacts within the quaternary structure and reveal hitherto unknown roles for Arg20 and Lys266 in DNA binding and integrase function. Models for clinical inhibitors bound at the HIV-1 integrase active site were also constructed and compared with previous studies. Our findings highlight the structural basis for HIV-1 integration and define the mechanism of its inhibition, which should help in formulating new drugs to inhibit viruses resistant to first-in-class compounds.HIV/AIDS | integrase | integration | drug resistance | raltegravir

No abstract

Three-dimensional macromolecular structures shed critical light on biological mechanism and facilitate development of small molecule inhibitors. Clinical success of raltegravir, a potent inhibitor of HIV-1 integrase, demonstrated the utility of this viral DNA recombinase as an antiviral target. A variety of partial integrase structures reported in the past 16 years have been instrumental and very informative to the field. Nonetheless, because integrase protein fragments are unable to functionally engage the viral DNA substrate critical for strand transfer inhibitor binding, the early structures did little to materially impact drug development efforts. However, recent results based on prototype foamy virus integrase have fully reversed this trend, as a number of X-ray crystal structures of active integrase-DNA complexes revealed key mechanistic details and moreover established the foundation of HIV-1 IN strand transfer inhibitor action. In this review we discuss the landmarks in the progress of IN structural biology during the past 17 years.

Retroviruses favor target-DNA (tDNA) distortion and particular bases at sites of integration, but the mechanism underlying HIV-1 selectivity is unknown. Crystal structures revealed a network of prototype foamy virus (PFV) integrase residues that distort tDNA: Ala188 and Arg329 interact with tDNA bases, while Arg362 contacts the phosphodiester backbone. HIV-1 integrase residues Ser119, Arg231, and Lys258 were identified here as analogs of PFV integrase residues Ala188, Arg329 and Arg362, respectively. Thirteen integrase mutations were analyzed for effects on integrase activity in vitro and during virus infection, yielding a total of 1610 unique HIV-1 integration sites. Purine (R)/pyrimidine (Y) dinucleotide sequence analysis revealed HIV-1 prefers the tDNA signature (0)RYXRY(4), which accordingly favors overlapping flexible dinucleotides at the center of the integration site. Consistent with roles for Arg231 and Lys258 in sequence specific and non-specific binding, respectively, the R231E mutation altered integration site nucleotide preferences while K258E had no effect. S119A and S119T integrase mutations significantly altered base preferences at positions −3 and 7 from the site of viral DNA joining. The S119A preference moreover mimicked wild-type PFV selectivity at these positions. We conclude that HIV-1 IN residue Ser119 and PFV IN residue Ala188 contact analogous tDNA bases to effect virus integration.

Retroviral integrases catalyze two reactions, 3-processing of viral DNA ends, followed by integration of the processed ends into chromosomal DNA. X-ray crystal structures of integrase-DNA complexes from prototype foamy virus, a member of the Spumavirus genus of Retroviridae, have revealed the structural basis of integration and how clinically relevant integrase strand transfer inhibitors work. Underscoring the translational potential of targeting virus-host interactions, small molecules that bind at the host factor lens epithelium-derived growth factor/ p75-binding site on HIV-1 integrase promote dimerization and inhibit integrase-viral DNA assembly and catalysis. Here, we review recent advances in our knowledge of HIV-1 DNA integration, as well as future research directions.Retroviral replication proceeds through an obligate proviral or integrated DNA recombination intermediate. Integration provides a favorable environment for efficient gene expression, ensures inheritance of the virus in both daughter cells during mitosis, and forms the basis for latent HIV-1 reservoirs that persist in the face of highly active antiretroviral therapy. The early events of retroviral replication take place within the context of nucleoprotein complexes that are derived from the core of the infecting virus particle (1, 2). Within the confines of the reverse transcription complex (RTC), 2 the reverse transcriptase enzyme copies single-stranded viral RNA into a linear double-stranded DNA molecule containing a copy of the LTR sequence at each end. The viral integrase (IN) engages the LTR ends prior to catalyzing two spatially and temporally distinct chemical reactions. Soon after their synthesis (3), IN site-specifically processes each LTR end adjacent to an invariant CA dinucleotide (4, 5), yielding CA OH 3Ј-hydroxyl groups that serve as the nucleophiles for the second reaction, DNA strand transfer. Because the viral replication intermediate at this point gains the ability to catalyze DNA strand transfer activity, 3Ј-processing operationally marks the transition of the RTC to the pre-integration complex (PIC) (Fig. 1). In the strand transfer step, IN utilizes the 3Ј-oxygen atoms to cut chromosomal DNA in a staggered fashion and simultaneously join the viral DNA ends to the 5Ј-phosphates of the target DNA (4, 6, 7). The resulting DNA recombination intermediate, with unjoined viral DNA 5Ј-ends, is repaired by host cell enzymes to yield the integrated provirus flanked by the duplication of the sequence of the staggered DNA cut (Fig. 1). The spumaviruses, which compose one of seven Retroviridae genera, are an exception to this generalized scheme, as DNA synthesis is largely complete prior to target cell infection (8). Research on the functionality of the active nucleoprotein complexes that mediate HIV-1 DNA integration has led to the development of antiviral inhibitors that target the IN and block integration. IN Domain Structure and Reaction MechanismRetroviral INs belong to a superfamily of proteins known as the retroviral IN superfam...

Background: The 18 residue tail abutting the SH3 fold that comprises the heart of the C-terminal domain is the only part of HIV-1 integrase yet to be visualized by structural biology. To ascertain the role of the tail region in integrase function and HIV-1 replication, a set of deletion mutants that successively lacked three amino acids was constructed and analyzed in a variety of biochemical and virus infection assays. HIV-1/2 chimers, which harbored the analogous 23-mer HIV-2 tail in place of the HIV-1 sequence, were also studied. Because integrase mutations can affect steps in the replication cycle other than integration, defective mutant viruses were tested for integrase protein content and reverse transcription in addition to integration. The F185K core domain mutation, which increases integrase protein solubility, was furthermore analyzed in a subset of mutants.

Structural and physiological facets of carbohydrate-peptide mimicry were addressed by analyzing the Ab response to α-d-mannopyranoside. mAbs against α-d-mannopyranoside were generated and screened with the carbohydrate-mimicking 12 mer (DVFYPYPYASGS) peptide. Three mAbs, 2D10, 1H11, and 1H7, which were subjected to detailed analysis, exhibit diverse V gene usage, indicating their independent germline origins. Although the mAb 1H7 was specific in binding only to the immunizing Ag, the Abs 2D10 and 1H11 recognize the 12 mer peptide as well as the immunogen, α-d-mannopyranoside. The Abs that recognize mimicry appear to bind to a common epitope on the peptide and do not share the mode of peptide binding with Con A. Binding kinetics and thermodynamics of Ag recognition suggest that the Ab that does not recognize peptide-carbohydrate mimicry probably has a predesigned mannopyranoside-complementing site. In contrast, the mimicry-recognizing Abs adopt the Ag-combining site only on exposure to the sugar, exploiting the conformational flexibility in the CDRs. Although the mAb 1H7 showed unique specificity toward mannopyranoside, the mimicry-recognizing Abs 2D10 and 1H11 exhibited degenerate specificities with regard to other sugar moieties. It is proposed that the degeneracy of specificity arising from the plasticity at the Ag-combining site in a subset of the Ab clones may be responsible for exhibiting molecular mimicry in the context of Ab response.