More than 20 countries in Africa are scaling up performance-based financing (PBF), but its impact on equity in access to health services remains to be documented. This paper draws on evidence from Rwanda to examine the capacity of PBF to ensure equal access to key health interventions especially in rural areas where most of the poor live. Specifically, it focuses on maternal and child health services, distinguishing two wealth groups, and uses data from a rigorous impact evaluation. Difference-in-difference technique is used, and different model specifications are tested: control for unobserved heterogeneity and common random error using linear probability model, seemingly unrelated regression equations, and clustering and fixed effects. Results suggest that in Rwanda, PBF improved efficiency rather than equity for most health services. We find that PBF achieved efficiency gains by improving access to health services for those easier to reach, generally the relatively more affluent. It turns out to be less effective in reaching the poorest. Our results illustrate the advantages of rigorous randomized impact evaluation data as results published earlier using a nationally representative survey (Demographic and Health Survey) were not able to capture the pro-rich nature of the PBF scheme in Rwanda. Our paper advocates for building mechanisms targeting the vulnerable groups in PBF strategies. It also highlights the need to understand the impact of PBF together with the specific development of health insurance coverage and the organization of the health system.

In the last decade, Zimbabwe has undertaken substantial changes and implemented new initiatives to improve health system performance and services delivery, including results-based financing in rural health facilities. This study aims to examine the utilization of health services and level of financial risk protection of Zimbabwe's health system. Using a multistage sampling approach, 7,135 households with a total of 32,294 individuals were surveyed in early 2016 on utilization of health services, out-of-pocket (OOP) health expenditure, and household consumption (as a measure of living standards) in 2015. The study found that the outpatient visits were favorable to the poor but the poorest had less access to inpatient care. In 2015, household OOP expenditure accounted for about one quarter of total health expenditure in Zimbabwe and 7.6% of households incurred catastrophic health expenditure (CHE). The incidence of CHE was 13.4% in the poorest quintile in comparison with 2.8% in the richest. Additionally, 1.29% of households fell into poverty due to health care-related expenditures. The study suggests that there are inequalities in utilization of health services among different population groups. The poor seeking inpatient care are the most vulnerable to CHE.

No abstract

of PBF on non-clinical dimensions of satisfaction also suggests that PBF incentivizes providers to raise 12 patients' satisfaction with non-clinical services if it is associated with future financial gains. It is 13 recommended that low and middle income countries build on the experience from high income 14 countries to better listen to patients' voice in general and include an assessment of patients' satisfaction 15 in incentive mechanisms as a way to increase the benefits of the strategy. 16

No abstract

No abstract