Disclosures:The author(s) indicated no potential conflicts of interest. ABSTRACTPurpose. To identify the determinants of antibody responses to adjuvanted influenza A/H1N1/09 vaccines in a cohort of cancer outpatients.Patients and Methods. Patients with cancer and controls were enrolled in a prospective single-center field study. Two doses of AS03-adjuvanted pandemic influenza vaccine were administered to patients and one dose was administered to controls. Antibody responses were measured using hemagglutination inhibition and confirmed by microneutralization. Geometric mean titers (GMTs) and seroprotection rates (defined as GMTs >40) were compared.Results. Immunizations were safe and well tolerated in 197 cancer patients (lymphoma, 57; glioma, 26; lung or head and neck, 37; gastrointestinal, 41; breast, 36) and 138 controls. Similar seroprotection rates (82.3% versus 87%) and GMTs (336.9 versus 329.9) were achieved after two doses of adjuvanted vaccine in cancer patients and one dose in controls. Univariate analyses identified older age, prior immunization against seasonal influenza, lymphoma, CD4 count, active chemotherapy, and rituximab and steroid treatments as being associated with weaker antibody responses. However, only age and chemotherapy plus rituximab remained independent determinants of vaccine responses in multivariate analyses.Conclusions. Two doses of AS03-adjuvanted influenza vaccine elicited potent antibody responses in most cancer patients despite ongoing chemotherapy, with the exception of rituximab-induced B-cell depletion. Oncology patients treated in an outpatient setting benefit from preventive vaccination against influenza with adjuvanted vaccines.

Bortezomib (Velcade®) is a proteasome inhibitor recently developed and mainly used for the treatment of multiple myeloma. Bortezomib represents a novel class of drugs functioning as proteasome inhibitors. Skin complications of bortezomib treatment are very frequent but poorly characterized. We describe the case of a patient who developed erythematous and edematous plaques after treatment with bortezomib. This case illustrates one of the potential reactions associated with bortezomib administration and underlines the need to recognize and report cutaneous side effects of this new drug.

No abstract

Isolated leptomeningeal recurrence of melanoma is rare, occurring in 2% of patients with central nervous system involvement secondary to melanoma. The optimal treatment of leptomeningeal carcinomatosis (LMC) in melanoma has not yet been determined and remains a major challenge. We report a melanoma patient who presented with isolated LMC in the form of a new-onset weakness of the lower limbs, paresthesia of the left hand and foot, lumbago and headache. A lumbar puncture and spinal MRI confirmed LMC. The patient was treated with temozolomide 75 mg/m²/day on a 4 weeks on/2 weeks off schedule. After an initial transient clinical deterioration, the patient showed a complete radiological response as well as a dramatic improvement in quality of life. The encouraging clinical response reported here suggests that dose-intensified temozolomide might have significant activity in the treatment of leptomeningeal dissemination of melanoma and may be a valid treatment option for patients who have not been previously exposed to this agent. Moreover, this treatment regimen is extremely well tolerated and obviates the need for repeated intrathecal administrations of chemotherapeutic agents, which are often not well tolerated by patients who have significant co-morbidities due to their disease. As illustrated in this case, response to temozolomide may occur in a delayed manner, highlighting the importance of following temozolomide treatment long enough before determining that it is inefficient in a given patient.

No abstract