Purpose:To determine the utility of MRI for assessing axillary lymph node status in patients with breast cancer. Materials and Methods:A consecutive series of patients who underwent breast MR before surgical management of breast cancer with axillary sampling between 2005 and 2007 were identified. MRs were evaluated for the number of nodes, contrast kinetics, nodal area, and number of nodes with no fatty hilum. Data were analyzed in the context of final breast pathology, sentinel lymph node status, and axillary nodal status. Correlations were analyzed using Kendall's -b test. Reported P values are one-sided.Results: Fifty-six females (median ϭ 58 years) were studied. Sentinel lymph nodes (SLN) were positive in 15/56 patients (27%). All SLN ϩ patients (n ϭ 15) had completion axillary dissection. Extent of nodal disease was 1 (n ϭ 3), 2 (n ϭ 4), Ͼ2 (n ϭ 8). Presence of any axillary lymph node with no fatty hilum and the number of nodes with no fatty hilum on MR significantly correlated with pathologic node positivity (P ϭ 0.04); while kinetics, node number, and node size did not correlate. Conclusion:Breast MR may be useful in the assessment of axillary nodes in patients with breast cancer.

after laser irradiation, the treated sections were more similar to a non-scarring process than the control. Cosmetic outcome: visual analog scales increased in all groups (P < 0.05), but the greatest increases were observed in the 585 nm and 595 nm laser-treated groups (50% and 60%, respectively) compared with controls (30%). There were significantly higher scores with the lasers than for the control (P < 0.001) at each visit after baseline. Both the 585 nm and 595 nm PDL treatments were effective in improving the appearance and normalizing the vascularity and pliability of post-operative scars. Both wavelengths improved the scars' visual appearance more than controls. We found that 585 nm appears to be the preferred wavelength, as it substantially normalized the height in addition to the vascularity and pliability in a significant number of scars.

Facial skin treatments with laser resurfacing, dermabrasion, and chemical peels were responsible for a significant portion of the 2.7 million cosmetic procedures performed in 1998. Perioral wrinkles are a common problem for which plastic surgical consultation is obtained. The aim of this study was to compare and quantify the advantages and disadvantages of laser resurfacing versus dermabrasion in the treatment of perioral wrinkles. Twenty female patients provided informed consent and participated in the study. Half of the perioral area was treated with dermabrasion and half was treated with the UltraPulse CO2 laser. The two procedures were compared using high-quality photographs; a biophysical evaluation of skin color, hydration, and mechanical properties; and patient evaluation of outcomes. Photographs were evaluated by 10 board-certified plastic surgeons who were blinded to the treatment methods. The laser treatment had a significantly higher erythema score at 1 month and a small but significantly greater improvement in perioral wrinkles at 6 months. Thirteen subjects selected the laser treatment as producing the best result, despite the greater intraoperative pain for this procedure. Biomechanical measurements suggest that the laser treatment produced a skin state more similar to skin in younger patients, presumably with higher levels and/or greater organization of the collagen and elastin. Patient preference was inferred from the resurfacing method that they would recommend to a friend. Although the laser was selected as the best result in a majority of cases, patient preference was equally distributed between the two treatments. The authors think that by studying and quantifying the biophysical changes that occur as a result of CO2 laser resurfacing, greater improvements in restoring actinic damage (e.g., wrinkles) can be achieved. Patients consider more than the objective skin changes from a resurfacing technique when making a recommendation to a friend.