BackgroundAustralia has unrestricted access to direct-acting antivirals (DAA) for hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment. In order to increase access to treatment, primary care providers are able to prescribe DAA after fibrosis assessment and specialist consultation. Transient elastography (TE) is recommended prior to commencement of HCV treatment; however, TE is rarely available outside secondary care centres in Australia and therefore a requirement for TE could represent a barrier to access to HCV treatment in primary care.ObjectivesIn order to bridge this access gap, we developed a community-based TE service across the Sunshine Coast and Wide Bay areas of Queensland.DesignRetrospective analysis of a prospectively recorded HCV treatment database.InterventionsA nurse-led service equipped with two mobile Fibroscan units assesses patients in eight locations across regional Queensland. Patients are referred into the service via primary care and undergo nurse-led TE at a location convenient to the patient. Patients are discussed at a weekly multidisciplinary team meeting and a treatment recommendation made to the referring GP. Treatment is initiated and monitored in primary care. Patients with cirrhosis are offered follow-up in secondary care.Results327 patients have undergone assessment and commenced treatment in primary care. Median age 48 years (IQR 38–56), 66% male. 57% genotype 1, 40% genotype 3; 82% treatment naïve; 10% had cirrhosis (liver stiffness >12.5 kPa). The majority were treated with sofosbuvir-based regimens. 26% treated with 8-week regimens. All patients had treatment prescribed and monitored in primary care. Telephone follow-up to confirm sustained virological response (SVR) was performed by clinic nurses. 147 patients remain on treatment. 180 patients have completed treatment. SVR data were not available for 19 patients (lost to follow-up). Intention-to-treat SVR rate was 85.5%. In patients with complete data SVR rate was 95.6%.ConclusionCommunity-based TE assessment facilitates access to HCV treatment in primary care with excellent SVR rates.
Purpose of review This review explores recent evidence assessing the relationship between obesity and thyroid cancer. Recent findings Consistent evidence from observational studies suggests that obesity increases the risk of thyroid cancer. The relationship persists when alternative measures of adiposity are used, but the strength of association may vary according to the timing and duration of obesity and how obesity or other metabolic parameters are defined as exposures. Recent studies have reported an association between obesity and thyroid cancers that are larger or have adverse clinicopathologic features, including those with BRAF mutations, thus providing evidence that the association is relevant for clinically significant thyroid cancers. The underlying mechanism for the association remains uncertain but may be driven by disruption in adipokines and growth-signaling pathways. Summary Obesity is associated with an increased risk of thyroid cancer, although further research is required to understand the biological mechanisms underpinning this relationship. Reducing the prevalence of obesity is predicted to lessen the future burden of thyroid cancer. However, the presence of obesity does not impact current recommendations for screening or management of thyroid cancer.
Background Current guidelines suggest using transient elastography (TE) or aspartate aminotransferase to platelet ratio index (APRI) score <1 to exclude cirrhosis prior to commencing treatment for hepatitis C virus (HCV). Recently, fibrosis‐4 (FIB‐4) <0.93 has been shown to have a high negative predictive value (NPV) for the presence of cirrhosis. Aims To assess FIB‐4 and APRI in a cohort of HCV patients and to validate FIB‐4 <0.93 in populations of HCV‐infected individuals with differing cirrhosis prevalence, including secondary care, primary care and prisons. Methods From our treatment database, we identified patients with complete data (n = 793). We calculated FIB‐4 and APRI and correlated this with the presence of cirrhosis, determined by TE. We analysed the performance of FIB‐4 and APRI using area under the receiver operating curve analysis. We calculated sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, NPV and number of patients misclassified using published cut‐offs in populations with varying cirrhosis prevalence. Results FIB‐4 was superior to APRI for the diagnosis of cirrhosis (area under the receiver operating curve 0.868 vs 0.802). In secondary care (cirrhosis prevalence 32%), APRI <1 had a NPV of 80% and misclassified 14% of patients. FIB‐4 <0.93 had a NPV of 97% and misclassified 1%. In primary care and prison (cirrhosis prevalence 13% and 8%), the NPV for APRI <1 was 93% and 96%, respectively, but 5% of patients with cirrhosis were misclassified. FIB‐4 <0.93 had excellent NPV in both primary care (97%) and prisoners (100%). Conclusions FIB‐4 <0.93 is highly efficient at ruling out cirrhosis in HCV patients and allows TE to be appropriately avoided, thereby streamlining treatment algorithms.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.