New pre-school UK charts have been produced incorporating the new World Health Organization growth standards based on healthy breastfed infants. This paper describes the process by which the charts and evidence-based instructions were designed and evaluated, and what it revealed about professional understanding of charts and growth monitoring. A multidisciplinary expert group drew on existing literature, new data analyses and parent focus groups as well as two series of chart-plotting workshops for health staff. The first series explored possible design features and general chart understanding. The second evaluated an advanced prototype with instructions, using plotting and interpretation of three separate scenarios on the old charts, compared with the new charts. The first plotting workshops (46 participants) allowed decisions to be made about the exact chart format, but it also revealed widespread confusion about use of adjustment for gestation and the plotting of birthweight. In the second series (78 participants), high levels of plotting inaccuracy were identified on both chart formats, with 64% of respondents making at least one major mistake. Significant neonatal weight loss was poorly recognized. While most participants recognized abnormal and normal growth patterns, 13-20% did not. Many respondents had never received any formal training in chart use. Growth charts are complex clinical tools that are, at present, poorly understood and inconsistently used. The importance of clear guidelines and formal training has now been recognized and translated into supporting educational materials (free to download at http://www.growthcharts.rcpch.ac.uk).

Over 95% of the 85,000 people living with diagnosed HIV in the UK are achieving and maintaining an undetectable viral load whilst on effective antiretroviral therapy-they can expect a normal life span and are protected from transmitting HIV. Nevertheless people living with HIV reported high rates of stigma and discrimination when attending their dental practice in the previous 12 months.  These findings are a wakeup call to the dental team to ensure that care is delivered without discrimination and prejudice.  Greater awareness and training is required to ensure the dental team provides optimal care to people living with HIV in a supportive environment.

We aim to understand the difference in stigma and discrimination, in particular sexual rejection, experienced between gay and heterosexual men living with HIV in the UK. The People Living with HIV StigmaSurvey UK 2015 recruited a convenience sample of persons with HIV through over 120 cross sector community organisations and 46 HIV clinics to complete an online survey. 1162 men completed the survey, 969 (83%) gay men and 193 (17%) heterosexual men, 92% were on antiretroviral therapy. Compared to heterosexual men, gay men were significantly more likely to report worrying about workplace treatment in relation to their HIV (21% vs. 11%), worrying about HIV-related sexual rejection (42% vs 21%), avoiding sex because of their HIV status (37% vs. 23%), and experiencing HIV-related sexual rejection (27% vs. 9%) in the past 12 months. In a multivariate logistic regression controlling for other sociodemographic factors, being gay was a predictor of reporting HIV-related sexual rejection in the past 12 months (aOR 2.17, CI 1.16, 4.02). Both gay and heterosexual men living with HIV experienced stigma and discrimination in the past 12 months, and this was higher for gay men in terms of HIV-related sexual rejection. Due to the high proportion of men reporting sexual rejection, greater awareness and education of the low risk of transmission of HIV among people on effective treatment is needed to reduce stigma and sexual prejudice towards people living with HIV.

To investigate current policy and practice in postnatal depression in Scotland and to consider how effectively guidelines were addressed. A questionnaire survey of all National Health Service Boards in Scotland between September 2003 and February 2004 to determine what written policies for postnatal depression were in place as at September 2003. This was followed by a questionnaire survey of a representative sample of general practices in Scotland to determine the routine procedures in use for managing postnatal depression in general practice primary care teams. NHS Boards and general practices in Scotland, UK. Forty-seven per cent of policies and 68% of General Practices had implemented the majority of the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network 60 evidence based recommendations. Practices were more likely than NHS Boards to have addressed a higher percentage of the recommendations (p < 0.05). Practices were more likely to implement antenatal screening for a history of puerperal psychosis if they were within NHS Boards that recommend this as routine practice. Practices within NHS Boards that had in-patient facilities for mother and baby admissions were more likely to identify these services as a treatment option than in the areas where the NHS Boards indicated the facilities were unavailable. Board guidance did not relate significantly to the likelihood of practices following the other evidence-based recommendations. Minimum standards represented by the SIGN 60 evidence-based recommendations were mostly followed in both policy and practice. If Board policy followed guidelines, the guidelines were more likely to be implemented at primary care level.