We undertook a systematic study focused on the matricellular protein Thrombospondin-1 (THBS1) to uncover molecular mechanisms underlying the role of THBS1 in glioblastoma (GBM) development. THBS1 was found to be increased with glioma grades. Mechanistically, we show that the TGFβ canonical pathway transcriptionally regulates THBS1, through SMAD3 binding to the THBS1 gene promoter. THBS1 silencing inhibits tumour cell invasion and growth, alone and in combination with anti-angiogenic therapy. Specific inhibition of the THBS1/CD47 interaction using an antagonist peptide decreases cell invasion. This is confirmed by CD47 knock-down experiments. RNA sequencing of patient-derived xenograft tissue from laser capture micro-dissected peripheral and central tumour areas demonstrates that THBS1 is one of the gene with the highest connectivity at the tumour borders. All in all, these data show that TGFβ1 induces THBS1 expression via Smad3 which contributes to the invasive behaviour during GBM expansion. Furthermore, tumour cell-bound CD47 is implicated in this process.

Background: The HER2-targeted antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) demonstrated efficacy in heavily pretreated HER2-over- and HER2-low expressing ABC (1, 2). We aimed to assess the activity of T-DXd in HER2-over-, HER2-low and HER2-nul expressing ABC, to describe the drug mechanisms of action in the 3 cohorts and to identify biomarkers associated to drug response or resistance. Study Description: DAISY is a multicenter, open-label phase II trial designed to assess the efficacy of single agent T-DXd at 5.4 mg/kg dose in ABC with extensive biomarkers analysis. Three cohorts of patients were included: Cohort 1 (HER2 over-expressing: HER2 3+ on immunohistochemistry (IHC) or HER2 IHC2+/in situ hybridization [ISH]+), Cohort 2 (HER2 low-expressing: IHC1+ or IHC2+/ISH-) and cohort 3 (HER2-nul: IHC0+). Biopsy of metastatic sites was performed: at baseline, on treatment (mandatory for cohort 1, optional for cohort 2/3) and at tumor progression; blood samples for ctDNA were collected at baseline. The primary endpoint was the Best Overall Response (BOR) in each cohort, according to the investigator assessment. Secondary endpoints were BOR by central assessment, clinical benefit rate, duration of response (DOR), progression-free (PFS), overall survival (OS) and safety. Results:185 women and 1 man were enrolled between November 2019 and March 2021. Among the patients enrolled in the safety population (see Table 1), median (range) age was 55 (24-82) years, all received at least one prior line of therapy and 12 patients were TN. Table 2 shows investigator-reported T-Dxd activity in the 3 cohorts at a median follow-up of 10.1 months [95%CI: 9.2-11.1]. A total of 170 patients (95%) had at least one treatment-related toxicity. Key grade ≥3 treatment-related toxicities included neutropenia (10.6% of patients), fatigue (5.6%), leucopenia (4.5%), vomiting (4.5%) and anemia (3.4%). A total of 4 patients had drug-related interstitial lung disease or pneumonitis (grade 1 in 3 patients and grade 2 in 1 patient), 11 patients discontinued treatment due to treatment-related adverse events. No drug-related deaths occurred. Conclusions: T-DXd showed clinically meaningful activity in patients with HER2-overexpressing ABC and interestingly also in those with HER2low and HER2-nul ABC. Safety profile was consistent with previous reports. 1.Modi S et al N Engl J Med 2020 2.Mosi S et al J Clin Oncol 2020 Table 1.Analysis populationsTotalCohort 1 (HER2 over-expressing)Cohort 2 (HER2 low-expressing)Cohort 3 (HER2 non-detected)Enrolled population186727440Safety population*179687338 (including 12 TN)Full analysis Set**176687236TN: Triple Negative. *: safety population = enrolled population except 7 patients who did not receive at least one dose of study drug. **: Full Analysis Set = safety population except 3 patients (2 who did not have a valid first post-baseline assessment of disease status or who did not have progressive disease and 1 who did not have at least one radiologically measurable lesion according to RECIST v1.1) Table 2.T-DXd activity in the three cohorts according to investigator assessmentTotalCohort 1Cohort 2Cohort 3BOR confirmedn/N82/176 (46.6%)47/68 (69.1%)24/72 (33.3%)11/36 (30.6%)[95%CI][39.1; 54.2][56.7; 79.8][22.7; 45.4]16.3; 48.1]Median DORmonths7.69.97.66.8[95%CI][6.2; 9.7][5.4; NR][4.4; 8.7][2.8; 8.3]Median PFSmonths6.911.16.74.2[95%CI][6.7; 8.7][8.4; NR][4.6; 8.5][2.1; 6.9]NR: Not Reached Citation Format: Véronique Diéras, Elise Deluche, Amélie Lusque, Barbara Pistilli, Thomas Bachelot, Jean-Yves Pierga, Frédéric Viret, Christelle Levy, Laura Salabert, Fanny Le Du, Florence Dalenc, Christelle Jouannaud, Laurence Venat-Bouvet, Jean-Philippe Jacquin, Xavier Durando, Thierry Petit, Céline Mahier - Aït Oukhatar, Thomas Filleron, Maria Fernanda Mosele, Magali Lacroix-Triki, Agnès Ducoulombier, Fabrice André. Trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) for advanced breast cancer patients (ABC), regardless HER2 status: A phase II study with biomarkers analysis (DAISY) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD8-02.

BackgroundTo determine safety and efficacy of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for local treatment of lung metastases of renal cell carcinoma (RCC), sequenced or combined with systemic treatments.MethodsRetrospectively, we studied 53 patients treated by RFA for a maximum of six lung metastases of RCC. The endpoints were local efficacy, overall (OS), disease-free (DFS), pulmonary progression-free (PPFS) and systemic treatment-free (STFS) survivals, complications graded by the CTCAE classification and factors associated with survivals. Potential factors analysed were: clinical and pathological data, tumoral staging of TNM classification, primary tumor histology, Fuhrman’s grade, age, number and size of lung metastases and extra-pulmonary metastases pre-RFA.ResultsOne hundred metastases were treated by RFA. Median follow-up time was 61 months (interquartile range 90–34). Five-year OS was 62% (95% confidence interval (CI): 44–75). Median DFS was 9.9 months (95% CI: 6–16). PPFS at 1 and 3 years was 58.9% (95%CI: 44.1–70.9) and 35.2% (95%CI: 21.6–49.1), respectively. We observed 3% major complications (grade 3 and 4 of CTCAE classification). Local efficacy was 91%. Median STFS was 28.3 months. Thirteen patients (25%) with lung recurrence could be treated by another RFA. T3/T4 tumors had significantly worse OS, PPFS and STFS. Having two or more lung metastases increased the risk of pulmonary progression more than threefold.ConclusionIntegrated to systemic treatment strategy, RFA is safe and effective for the treatment strategy of lung metastasis from RCC with good OS and long systemic treatment-free survival. RFA offers the possibility of repeat procedures, with low morbidity.