Background: Little is known about the intensity of multi-component initiatives (MCI) inclusive of any combination of programs, practices, policies, and environmental changes (P3E) on youth behaviors. Methods: The Healthy Schools Healthy Communities (HSHC) initiative worked to increase access to PA opportunities as part of 33 MCIs targeting school districts and respective communities. The purpose of this study was to assess whether MCIs with higher scoring PA-related strategies were associated with improved PA and sedentary behaviors among youth. PA-related interventions were assigned point values based on three characteristics: 1) purpose of initiative); 2) duration; and 3) reach. An overall composite score of all activities was calculated for each school district. Multivariate longitudinal regressions were applied, controlling for measurement period, Cohort, and district enrollment. Results: P3E scores ranged from 0.3 to 3.0 with 20% considered “higher-scoring” (score > 2.1) and 47% considered “lower-scoring” ( < 1.2 ). Average composite district P3E scores more than tripled over the evaluation period, rising from 14.8 in the first grant year to 32.1 in year 2, 41.1 in year 3, and 48.1 in year 4. For each additional point increase in average composite district P3E intensity score, the number of days per week that students reported being physically active for at least 60 minutes increased by 0.010 (p<0.01). For each additional point increase in district P3E intensity score, the number of hours per weekday that students reported engaging in screen time activities decreased by 0.006 hours (p<0.5). Conclusions: MCIs are difficult to evaluate given the variations within which they are implemented. Findings from this study suggest the value of a systematic scoring approach in assessing MCIs. In addition to tracking intensity over time, scoring can provide justification for, or against, an individual activity and ways to increase the likelihood of the MCI impacting population-health outcomes.
Background: Little is known about the intensity of multi-component initiatives (MCI) inclusive of any combination of programs, practices, policies, and environmental changes (P3E) on youth behaviors. Methods: The Healthy Schools Healthy Communities (HSHC) initiative worked to increase access to PA opportunities as part of 33 MCIs targeting school districts and respective communities. The purpose of this study was to assess whether MCIs with higher scoring PA-related strategies were associated with improved PA and sedentary behaviors among youth. PA-related interventions were assigned point values based on three characteristics: 1) purpose of initiative); 2) duration; and 3) reach. An overall composite score of all activities was calculated for each school district. Multivariate longitudinal regressions were applied, controlling for measurement period, Cohort, and district enrollment. Results: P3E scores ranged from 0.3 to 3.0 with 20% considered “higher-scoring” (score > 2.1) and 47% considered “lower-scoring” ( < 1.2 ). Average composite district P3E scores more than tripled over the evaluation period, rising from 14.8 in the first grant year to 32.1 in year 2, 41.1 in year 3, and 48.1 in year 4. For each additional point increase in average composite district P3E intensity score, the number of days per week that students reported being physically active for at least 60 minutes increased by 0.010 (p<0.01). For each additional point increase in district P3E intensity score, the number of hours per weekday that students reported engaging in screen time activities decreased by 0.006 hours (p<0.5). Conclusions: MCIs are difficult to evaluate given the variations within which they are implemented. Findings from this study suggest the value of a systematic scoring approach in assessing MCIs. In addition to tracking intensity over time, scoring can provide justification for, or against, an individual activity and ways to increase the likelihood of the MCI impacting population-health outcomes.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.