Gene expression is central to the genotype-phenotype relationship in all organisms, and it is an important component of the genetic basis for evolutionary change in diverse aspects of phenotype. However, the evolution of transcriptional regulation remains understudied and poorly understood. Here we review the evolutionary dynamics of promoter, or cis-regulatory, sequences and the evolutionary mechanisms that shape them. Existing evidence indicates that populations harbor extensive genetic variation in promoter sequences, that a substantial fraction of this variation has consequences for both biochemical and organismal phenotype, and that some of this functional variation is sorted by selection. As with protein-coding sequences, rates and patterns of promoter sequence evolution differ considerably among loci and among clades for reasons that are not well understood. Studying the evolution of transcriptional regulation poses empirical and conceptual challenges beyond those typically encountered in analyses of coding sequence evolution: promoter organization is much less regular than that of coding sequences, and sequences required for the transcription of each locus reside at multiple other loci in the genome. Because of the strong context-dependence of transcriptional regulation, sequence inspection alone provides limited information about promoter function. Understanding the functional consequences of sequence differences among promoters generally requires biochemical and in vivo functional assays. Despite these challenges, important insights have already been gained into the evolution of transcriptional regulation, and the pace of discovery is accelerating.
An epithelial-mesenchymal cell transformation (EMT) occurs during the development of endocardial cushions in the atrioventricular (AV) canal of the heart. This is a complex developmental process regulated by multiple extracellular signals and signal transduction pathways. It was recently shown that the transcription factor Slug is expressed in the AV canal and is required for initial steps of EMT. Treatment of AV canal explants with either antisense oligodeoxynucleotides toward Slug or anti-TGFbeta2 antibody inhibited initial steps of EMT. Others have identified roles for HGF and BMP during EMT in the heart. Both HGF and BMP are known to regulate Slug in other cell types. To determine whether TGFbeta2 or other signaling factors regulate Slug expression during EMT in the heart, we cultured AV canal explants in the presence of anti-TGFbeta2 antibody, anti-TGFbeta3 antibody, pertussis toxin, retinoic acid, noggin, or anti-HGF antibody. Only treatment with anti-TGFbeta2 antibody or retinoic acid inhibited Slug expression in AV canal explants. Consistent with these data, we found that retinoic acid disrupted initial steps of EMT, while antagonists of BMP and HGF signaling disrupted later steps of EMT. Transfection of AV canal explants with Slug rescued the inhibitory effect of anti-TGFbeta2 antibody but not retinoic acid on EMT. Slug is thus an essential target of TGFbeta2 signaling during EMT in the developing chicken heart.
Twenty-four adults infected with human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) with central nervous system symptoms were studied for antiretroviral resistance mutations in HIV-1 RNA obtained from paired cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and plasma samples. Paired sequences were obtained from 21 and 13 patients for reverse transcriptase (RT) and for protease, respectively. Mutations conferring resistance to the RT inhibitors zidovudine, lamivudine, or nevirapine were detected in 14 patients, including 11 pretreated and 3 drug-naive subjects. The mutation patterns in the 2 compartments were different in most patients. Genotypic resistance to protease inhibitors was detected in both plasma and CSF from 1 patient treated with multiple protease inhibitors. However, accessory protease inhibitor resistance mutations at polymorphic sites were different in plasma and CSF in several patients. Partially independent evolution of viral quasispecies occurs in plasma and CSF, raising the possibility that compartmentalization of drug resistance may affect response to antiretroviral treatment.
Evolutionary changes in transcriptional regulation undoubtedly play an important role in creating morphological diversity. However, there is little information about the evolutionary dynamics of cisregulatory sequences. This study examines the functional consequence of evolutionary changes in the Endo16 promoter of sea urchins. The Endo16 gene encodes a large extracellular protein that is expressed in the endoderm and may play a role in cell adhesion. Its promoter has been characterized in exceptional detail in the purple sea urchin, Strongylocentrotus purpuratus. We have characterized the structure and function of the Endo16 promoter from a second sea urchin species, Lytechinus variegatus. The Endo16 promoter sequences have evolved in a strongly mosaic manner since these species diverged ~35 million years ago: the most proximal region (module A) is conserved, but the remaining modules (B-G) are unalignable. Despite extensive divergence in promoter sequences, the pattern of Endo16 transcription is largely conserved during embryonic and larval development. Transient expression assays demonstrate that 2.2 kb of upstream sequence in either species is sufficient to drive GFP reporter expression that correctly mimics this pattern of Endo16 transcription. Reciprocal cross-species transient expression assays imply that changes have also evolved in the set of transcription factors that interact with the Endo16 promoter. Taken together, these results suggest that stabilizing selection on the transcriptional output may have operated to maintain a similar pattern of Endo16 expression in S. purpuratus and L. variegatus, despite dramatic divergence in promoter sequence and mechanisms of transcriptional regulation.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.