No abstract

As light pollution is currently considered to be a major threat to biodiversity, different lighting management options are being explored to mitigate the impact of artificial lighting on wildlife. Although part-night lighting schemes have been adopted by many local authorities across Europe to reduce the carbon footprint and save energy, their effects on biodiversity are unknown. Through a paired, in situ experiment, we compared the activity levels of 8 bat species under unlit, part-night, and full-night lighting treatments in a rural area located 60 km south of Paris, France. We selected 36 study locations composed of 1 lit site and a paired unlit control site; 24 of these sites were located in areas subject to part-night lighting schemes, and 12 sites were in areas under standard, full-night lighting. There was significantly more activity on part-night lighting sites compared to full-night lighting sites for the late-emerging, light-sensitive Plecotus spp., and a similar pattern was observable for Myotis spp., although not significant. In contrast, part-night lighting did not influence the activity of early emerging bat species around streetlights, except for Pipistrellus pipistrellus for which there was significantly less activity on part-night lighting sites than on full-night lighting sites. Overall, no significant difference in activity between part- and full-night lighting sites were observed in 5 of the 8 species studied, suggesting that current part-night lighting schemes fail to encompass the range of activity of most bat species. We recommend that such schemes start earlier at night to effectively mitigate the adverse effects of artificial lighting on light-sensitive species, particularly along ecological corridors that are especially important to the persistence of biodiversity in urban landscapes.

No abstract

Microhabitat selection models are frequently used in rivers to evaluate anthropogenic effects on aquatic organisms. Fish models are generally developed from few rivers, with debatable statistical treatments for coping with overdispersed abundance distributions. Analyses of data from multiple rivers are needed to test their transferability and increase their relevance for stakeholders. Using 3,528 microhabitats sampled in nine French rivers during 129 surveys, we developed models for 35 specific size classes of 22 fish species. We used mixed‐effects generalized linear models (accounting for multiple surveys), involving B‐spline transformations (accounting for nonlinear responses) and assuming a negative binomial distribution (accounting for abundance overdispersion). We compared models of increasing complexity: no selection (M1), an “average” selection similar in all surveys (M2), two models with different selection across surveys (M3–M4). Of 132 univariate cases (specific size classes by habitat), 63% indicated selection for depth, 71% for velocity, 45% for substratum size and 13% for substratum heterogeneity. A total of 50 models were retained, involving 26/35 specific size classes. Model fits indicated low explained deviance (R2MF < 0.19) and higher rank correlations (ρ < 0.69) between observed and modelled values. However, Bayesian posterior predictive checks validated these results since excellent fits would generate R2MF lower than 0.59 and ρ lower than 0.78. We found high transferability among rivers and dates, because (a) M2 was the most appropriate in 26/50 cases; (b) the R2MF and ρ values by M2 was, respectively, 72% and 75% of that explained by the complex M4 and (c) independent river cross‐validations showed good transferability. Bivariate models for selected specific size classes improved univariate model fits (ρ from 0.30 to 0.38). Overall, using a nonlinear mixed‐effect approach, our results confirmed the relevance of “average” models based on several rivers for developing helpful e‐flow tools. Finally, our modelling approach opens opportunities for integrating additional effects as the spatial distribution of competitors.