INTRODUCTION Maternal mortality is an important indicator for quality control in obstetrics. To improve clinical care, maternal mortality should be assessed periodically. In this study, we analysed maternal mortality cases between 2005 and 2014 in Switzerland and compared them with those in earlier periods. METHODS The Federal Statistical Office (FSO) provided all death certificates between 2005 and 2014 with an ICD-10 code in the obstetric field (indicated with the letter O). Additionally, we included all death certificates that gave a positive answer about pregnancy or birth within the last 42 days. We also included cases where death occurred within 365 days after delivery. For an analysis of underreporting, cases from the Institute of Forensic Medicine (IRM), Zurich, were included. The cases were classified according to ICD-10 as “direct”, “indirect”, “non-pregnancy-related”, and “late” deaths. The direct maternal mortality rate (MMR), and indirect and combined MMRs were calculated. RESULTS We received 117 cases from the FSO, and one additional case was found in the archives of the IRM. Ninety-six cases were eligible for detailed evaluation. As 787,025 live births were recorded between 2005 and 2014 in Switzerland, the direct MMR was 3.30/100,000 live births (26 cases). It has decreased by 20.5% compared with the MMR in 1995–2004 (4.15/100,000 live births, 32 cases; p = n.s.) and by 40.4% compared with the MMR in 1985–1994 (5.54/100,000 live births, 45 cases; odds ratio [OR] 0.6, p = 0.04, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.37–0.97). The leading cause for direct maternal mortality in the current study period was haemorrhage (nine cases), followed by amniotic fluid embolisms and preeclampsia (five cases each). The indirect MMR was 3.68/100,000 live births. In this group, 13 women committed suicide and 8 women died of complications of pre-existing cardiac pathologies. Suicide was the leading cause of maternal deaths, had suicides been classified as direct obstetric cases. The combined MMR (direct and indirect) was 6.61/100,000 live births (52 cases) (OR 4.8–8.4). Of 41 non-pregnancy-related cases, almost half (20 cases) died of cancer within the first year after delivery. Lethality after caesarean section was 0.008‰ (2/231,385). CONCLUSIONS The trend of reducing direct maternal mortality as well as lethality after caesarean section continues. Haemorrhage is still the leading cause of direct maternal mortality; the rate is similar to what it was in the early 1990s. Indirect maternal mortality is increasing and specifically suicides need special attention. Precise documentation of all maternal deaths is essential to improve outcomes for future mothers.
Simplified first-trimester abortion protocols are well established. However, data on the use of medical or surgical abortion protocols across Switzerland is lacking. We report protocol characteristics in abortion care for two different facility types, hospital vs private practices (office-based) in Switzerland. Furthermore, we investigate an association between protocol characteristics and the likelihood of following through with the abortion at the same facility. We also report abortion outcomes of an office-based cohort where doctors use simplified abortion protocols. This study consists of two parts. (i) Between April and July, 2019, we collected data regarding medical and surgical abortion protocols of institutions offering abortions, in a nationwide survey. We assessed whether the proportion of patients who followed through with the abortion (primary outcome) after first appointment was associated with predefined protocol characteristics, considered to complicate access to abortion services, using generalised estimating equations. (ii) We analysed abortion outcomes of six selected office-based facilities from January, 2008, to December, 2018, using simplified abortion protocols in accordance with the Worlds Health Organisation (WHO) guidelines. (i) We included a total of 39 institutions. Hospitals showed more protocol-based barriers to abortion access compared with office-based facilities. The odds of undergoing an abortion after the first appointment were increased using protocols with minimal barriers. Overall, office-based facilities applied higher gestational age limits, required fewer appointments, and administered mifepristone more often after the first visit than did hospitals. (ii) We included a total of 5274 patients with an incidence of complications requiring surgery of 2.5% in line with rates reported in published literature. Only a few hospitals provide abortion care with easy access to medical and surgical abortion, whereas most office-based facilities do. Access to abortion services is generally crucial, and should be provided in a single visit whenever clinically permissible.
PurposeSimplified first-trimester abortion protocols are well established as they facilitate access to services and improve patient satisfaction without compromising safety. However, data on abortion protocols across Switzerland by facility type are lacking. Therefore, the first aim of this study was to analyse hospital-derived abortion protocols, as opposed to office-based protocols, across Switzerland in terms of their acceptance among women. The second aim was to assess abortion protocols and outcomes of specialised general practitioners (GPs) following simplified protocols.MethodsThis study consists of two parts. (i) A nationwide questionnaire was distributed among hospitals and private practices covering details of abortion protocols and numbers between April and July, 2019. The primary endpoint was the proportion of women undergoing an abortion after the first consultation at the chosen facility (adherence), regarding the complexity of abortion protocols in each setting. (ii) A retrospective study was conducted to analyse the outcomes of office-based institutions with simplified abortion procedures over a period of 10 years from January, 2008, to December, 2018. (BASEC-No. Req-2018-01031).Results (i) Office-based facilities showed less complex abortion protocols, resulting in a significantly higher probability of undergoing an abortion after the first consultation than hospitals. Their protocols allowed for a higher gestational age by medical means, and they offered mifepristone intake within the first consultation along with fewer staff members involved and a lower number of overall consultations. (ii) From 5,495 women, a total of 5,274 patients were included, of which the incidence of complications requiring surgery was at a low of 2.5%. ConclusionThis study highlights that simplified abortion protocols are crucial to ease access to abortion services, as represented by higher adherence in office-based facilities. Simplified protocols in abortion services are safe, and repetitive counselling and in-person visits should only be reserved for selected cases.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.