Bone mineral density (BMD) is the most important predictor of fracture risk. We performed the largest meta-analysis to date on lumbar spine and femoral neck BMD, including 17 genome-wide association studies and 32,961 individuals of European and East Asian ancestry. We tested the top-associated BMD markers for replication in 50,933 independent subjects and for risk of low-trauma fracture in 31,016 cases and 102,444 controls. We identified 56 loci (32 novel)associated with BMD atgenome-wide significant level (P<5×10−8). Several of these factors cluster within the RANK-RANKL-OPG, mesenchymal-stem-cell differentiation, endochondral ossification and the Wnt signalling pathways. However, we also discovered loci containing genes not known to play a role in bone biology. Fourteen BMD loci were also associated with fracture risk (P<5×10−4, Bonferroni corrected), of which six reached P<5×10−8 including: 18p11.21 (C18orf19), 7q21.3 (SLC25A13), 11q13.2 (LRP5), 4q22.1 (MEPE), 2p16.2 (SPTBN1) and 10q21.1 (DKK1). These findings shed light on the genetic architecture and pathophysiological mechanisms underlying BMD variation and fracture susceptibility.
Drs Ioannidis and Trikalinos had full access to all of the data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. Drs van Meurs and Trikalinos contributed equally to this article.
STEOPOROSIS IS A COMMONdisease characterized by reduced bone mass and an increased risk of fracture, which affects up to 30% of women and 12% of men at some point during life. Bone mineral density (BMD) is an important clinical predictor of fracture risk, and most of the variance in BMD is genetically determined. 1,2 Many other predictors of fragility fracture are also under genetic control, however, including ultrasound properties of bone, biochemical markers of bone turnover, and skeletal geometry. A wide variety of candidate genes have been investigated in relation to osteoporosis outcomes, but one of the most widely studied is the
Background The Italian Society for Orthopaedics and Traumatology conceived this guidance—which is primarily addressed to Italian orthopedic surgeons, but should also prove useful to other bone specialists and to general practitioners—in order to improve the diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of osteoporosis and its consequences.Materials and methodsLiterature reviews by a multidisciplinary team.ResultsThe following topics are covered: the role of instrumental, metabolic, and genetic evaluations in the diagnosis of osteoporosis; appraisal of the risk of fracture and thresholds for intervention; general strategies for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis (primary and secondary prevention); the pharmacologic treatment of osteoporosis; the setting and implementation of fracture liaison services for tertiary prevention. Grade A, B, and C recommendations are provided based on the main levels of evidence (1–3). Toolboxes for everyday clinical practice are provided.ConclusionsThe first up-to-date Italian guidelines for the primary, secondary, and tertiary prevention of osteoporosis and osteoporotic fractures are presented.
Current evidence suggests that estrogen plays a dominant role in determining bone mineral density (BMD) in men, and inactivating mutations in the aromatase CYP19 gene have been associated with low bone mass in young males. We previously reported an association between a TTTA repeat polymorphism in intron 4 of the CYP19 gene and osteoporotic risk in postmenopausal females. Here we explore the role of this polymorphism as a genetic determinant of BMD in a sample of elderly males who were recruited by direct mailing and followed longitudinally for 2 (n = 300) and 4 (n = 200) yr. Six different allelic variants, containing seven, eight, nine, 10, 11, and 12 TTTA repeats, were detected. There was a bimodal distribution of alleles, with two major peaks at seven and 11 repeats and a very low distribution of the nine-repeat allele. Men with a high-repeat genotype (>nine repeats) showed higher lumbar BMD values, lower bone turnover markers, higher estradiol levels, and a lower rate of BMD change than men with a low-repeat genotype (
Bone mineral density (BMD), the major determinant of osteoporotic fracture risk, has a strong genetic component. The discovery that inactivation of estrogen receptor alpha (ERalpha) gene is associated with low BMD indicated ERalpha as a candidate gene for osteoporosis. We have investigated the role of three ERalpha gene polymorphisms [intron 1 PVU:II and XBA:I RFLPs and TA dinucleotide repeat polymorphism 5' upstream of exon 1] in 610 postmenopausal women. There was a strong linkage disequilibrium between intron 1 polymorphic sites and also between these sites and the microsatellite (TA)(n) dinucleotide polymorphism, with a high degree of coincidence of the short TA alleles and the presence of PVU:II and XBA:I restriction sites. No significant relationship between intron 1 RFLPs and BMD was observed. A statistically significant correlation between (TA)(n) repeat allelic variants and lumbar BMD was observed (P = 0.04, ANCOVA), with subjects with a low number of repeats (TA < 15) showing the lowest BMD values. We observed a statistically significant difference in the mean +/- SD number of TA repeats between analyzed women with a vertebral fracture (n = 73) and the non-fracture group, equivalent to 2.9 (95% CI 1.56-5.72) increased fracture risk in women with a low number of repeats (TA < 15). We conclude that in this large population sample the (TA)(n) dinucleotide repeat polymorphism at the 5' end of the ERalpha gene accounts for part of the heritable component of BMD and might prove useful in the prediction of vertebral fracture risk in postmenopausal osteoporosis.
Bone mass and bone turnover are under genetic control. Restriction fragment length polymorphisms (RFLPs) at the vitamin D receptor (VDR) gene locus have been recently correlated to bone mineral density (BMD) and rate of bone loss. However, agreement on this relationship is not universal. The existence of ethnical and environmental differences between populations, a health-based selection bias in several previous studies, and the involvement of other genes could explain these discordant findings. In this study, we examined the relationship of VDR and estrogen receptor (ER) gene RFLPs with lumbar spine and upper femur BMD in 426 Italian postmenopausal women, 57.7 +/- 0.4 yr old (144 normal, 106 osteopenic, and 176 osteoporotic). VDR gene RFLPs for ApaI, Bsm I, and TaqI restriction endonucleases and ER RFLPs for PvuII and XbaI restriction endonucleases were assessed by Southern blotting analysis and were indicated, respectively, as A-a, B-b, T-t, P-p, and X-x (uppercase letters signifying the absence and lowercase letters the presence of the restriction site). After correcting for potential confounding factors (age, height, weight, age since menopause, osteophytosis, and facet joint osteoarthritis), a statistically significant VDR genotype effect on lumbar BMD (P = 0.01, analysis of covariance), but not on femoral BMD, was detected, with subjects in AABBtt genotype showing a 13% lower BMD than those with aabbTT genotype (P < 0.05, Tukey's test). Moreover, a statistically significant prevalence of AABBtt genotype in osteoporotics, and of AabbTT and aabbTT genotypes in nonosteoporotics, were detected. Conversely, there was no significant relationship of ER genotype to either lumbar or femoral BMD, even though a trend for higher BMD values in women with the ER PP genotype (with respect to those with ER pp genotype) was detected. When mean lumbar BMD was calculated for women grouped by ER and VDR genotype, we observed a significant difference between those within the 2 opposite associations AABBtt-PPXX and aabbTT-ppxx (0.71 +/- 0.05 vs. 0.97 +/- 0.03 g/cm2, P < 0.05 Tukey's test). These results are consistent with a segregation of the VDR AABBtt genotype with a higher risk of developing osteoporosis, in the Italian female population. The introduction of another variable, the ER genotype, in the analysis of VDR genetic determination of BMD, may represent a useful model in the identification of patients at risk of developing a multigenic disorder like osteoporosis.
Introduction: Paget's disease of bone (PDB) is a relatively common disease of bone metabolism reported to affect up to 3% of whites over 55 years of age. The disorder is genetically heterogeneous, and at present, there is scientific evidence that at least eight different human chromosomal loci are correlated with its pathogenesis. Mutations of the sequestosome1 (SQSTM1) gene were identified as responsible for most of the sporadic and familial forms of Paget in patients of French Canadian and British descent. Such mutations were located at exon 7 and 8 levels, encoding for the ubiquitin protein-binding domain (UBA) and representing a mutational hot spot area. Materials and Methods:To verify the involvement of this gene in Italian subjects affected by PDB, we performed mutational analysis in 62 sporadic PDB cases. Results: We described three different mutations at exon 8 level: P392L, already described in the French Canadian population and families predominantly of British descendent, and two novel mutations consisting of the amino acid substitutions M404V and G425R. No significant differences in the clinical history of PDB have been observed in patients with SQSTM1 mutations in respect to those without. Conclusions: Even though our findings suggest a minor involvement of the SQSTM1 gene in the pathogenesis of sporadic Italian Paget's cases, the identification of different significant mutations within the SQSTM1 gene in unrelated, but clinically similar individuals, offers extremely convincing evidence for a causal relationship between this gene and PDB. Longitudinal studies are needed to assess the penetrance of genotype/phenotype correlations. Our findings confirm the evidence of a clustered mutation area at this level in this disorder.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
334 Leonard St
Brooklyn, NY 11211
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.