BACKGROUND By identifying pathogenic variants across hundreds of genes, expanded carrier screening (ECS) enables prospective parents to assess the risk of transmitting an autosomal recessive or X-linked condition. Detection of at-risk couples depends on the number of conditions tested, the prevalence of the respective diseases, and the screen's analytical sensitivity for identifying disease-causing variants. Disease-level analytical sensitivity is often <100% in ECS tests because copy number variants (CNVs) are typically not interrogated because of their technical complexity. METHODS We present an analytical validation and preliminary clinical characterization of a 235-gene sequencing-based ECS with full coverage across coding regions, targeted assessment of pathogenic noncoding variants, panel-wide CNV calling, and specialized assays for technically challenging genes. Next-generation sequencing, customized bioinformatics, and expert manual call review were used to identify single-nucleotide variants, short insertions and deletions, and CNVs for all genes except FMR1 and those whose low disease incidence or high technical complexity precluded novel variant identification or interpretation. RESULTS Screening of 36859 patients' blood or saliva samples revealed the substantial impact on fetal disease-risk detection attributable to novel CNVs (9.19% of risk) and technically challenging conditions (20.2% of risk), such as congenital adrenal hyperplasia. Of the 7498 couples screened, 335 were identified as at risk for an affected pregnancy, underscoring the clinical importance of the test. Validation of our ECS demonstrated >99% analytical sensitivity and >99% analytical specificity. CONCLUSIONS Validated high-fidelity identification of different variant types—especially for diseases with complicated molecular genetics—maximizes at-risk couple detection.

No abstract

Clinical genomic tests increasingly utilize a next generation sequencing (NGS) platform due in part to the high fidelity of variant calls, yet rare errors are still possible. In hereditary cancer screening, failure to correct such errors could have serious consequences for patients, who may follow an unwarranted screening or surgical-management path. It has been suggested that routine orthogonal confirmation via Sanger sequencing is required to verify NGS results, especially low-confidence positives with depressed allele fraction (<30% of alternate allele). We evaluated whether an alternative method of confirmation-software-assisted manual call review-performed comparably to Sanger confirmation in >15,000 samples. Licensed reviewers manually inspected both raw and processed data at the batch-, sample-, and variant-level, including raw NGS read pileups. Of ambiguous variant calls with <30% allele fraction (1,707 total calls at 38 unique sites), manual call review classified >99% (1,701) as true positives (enriched for long insertions or deletions ("indels") and homopolymers) or true negatives (often conspicuous NGS artifacts), with the remaining <1% (6) being mosaic. Critically, results from software-assisted manual review and retrospective Sanger sequencing were concordant for samples selected from all ambiguous sites. We conclude that the confirmation required for high confidence in NGS-based germline testing can manifest in different ways: a trained NGS expert operating platform-tailored review software achieves quality comparable to routine Sanger confirmation.

BackgroundHereditary cancer screening (HCS) for germline variants in the 3′ exons of PMS2, a mismatch repair gene implicated in Lynch syndrome, is technically challenging due to homology with its pseudogene PMS2CL. Sequences of PMS2 and PMS2CL are so similar that next-generation sequencing (NGS) of short fragments—common practice in multigene HCS panels—may identify the presence of a variant but fail to disambiguate whether its origin is the gene or the pseudogene. Molecular approaches utilizing longer DNA fragments, such as long-range PCR (LR-PCR), can definitively localize variants in PMS2, yet applying such testing to all samples can have logistical and economic drawbacks.MethodsTo address these drawbacks, we propose and characterize a reflex workflow for variant discovery in the 3′ exons of PMS2. We cataloged the natural variation in PMS2 and PMS2CL in 707 samples and designed hybrid-capture probes to enrich the gene and pseudogene with equal efficiency. For PMS2 exon 11, NGS reads were aligned, filtered using gene-specific variants, and subject to standard diploid variant calling. For PMS2 exons 12–15, the NGS reads were permissively aligned to PMS2, and variant calling was performed with the expectation of observing four alleles (i.e., tetraploid calling). In this reflex workflow, short-read NGS identifies potentially reportable variants that are then subject to disambiguation via LR-PCR-based testing.ResultsApplying short-read NGS screening to 299 HCS samples and cell lines demonstrated >99% analytical sensitivity and >99% analytical specificity for single-nucleotide variants (SNVs) and short insertions and deletions (indels), as well as >96% analytical sensitivity and >99% analytical specificity for copy-number variants. Importantly, 92% of samples had resolved genotypes from short-read NGS alone, with the remaining 8% requiring LR-PCR reflex.ConclusionOur reflex workflow mitigates the challenges of screening in PMS2 and serves as a guide for clinical laboratories performing multigene HCS. To facilitate future exploration and testing of PMS2 variants, we share the raw and processed LR-PCR data from commercially available cell lines, as well as variant frequencies from a diverse patient cohort.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (10.1186/s12881-018-0691-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Clinical genomic tests increasingly use a next-generation sequencing (NGS) platform due in part to the high fidelity of variant calls, yet rare errors are still possible. In germline DNA screening, failure to correct such errors could have serious consequences for patients, who may follow an unwarranted screening or surgical management path. It has been suggested that routine orthogonal confirmation by Sanger sequencing is required to verify NGS results, especially low-confidence positives with depressed allele fraction (<30% of alternate allele). We evaluated whether an alternative method of confirmationdsoftware-assisted manual call reviewdperformed comparably with Sanger confirmation in >15,000 samples. Licensed reviewers manually inspected both raw and processed data at the batch, sample, and variant levels, including raw NGS read pileups. Of ambiguous variant calls with <30% allele fraction (1707 total calls at 38 unique sites), manual call review classified >99% (n Z 1701) as true positives (enriched for long insertions or deletions and homopolymers) or true negatives (often conspicuous NGS artifacts), with the remaining <1% (n Z 6) being mosaic. Critically, results from software-assisted manual review and retrospective Sanger sequencing were concordant for samples selected from all ambiguous sites. We conclude that the confirmation required for high confidence in NGS-based germline testing can manifest in different ways; a trained NGS expert operating platformtailored review software achieves quality comparable with routine Sanger confirmation.