We propose that the forward and reverse halves of a flash-induced protein-protein electron transfer (ET) photocycle should exhibit differential responses to dynamic interconversion of configurations when the most stable configuration is not the most reactive, because the reactants exist in different initial configurations: the flash-photoinitiated forward ET process begins with the protein partners in an equilibrium ensemble of configurations, many of which have little or no reactivity, whereas the reactant of the thermal back ET (the charge-separated intermediate) is formed in a nonequilibrium, ''activated'' protein configuration. We report evidence for this proposal in measurements on (i) mixed-metal hemoglobin hybrids, (ii) the complex between cytochrome c peroxidase and cytochrome c, and (iii and iv) the complexes of myoglobin and isolated hemoglobin ␣-chains with cytochrome b 5. For all three systems, forward and reverse ET does respond differently to modulation of dynamic processes; further, the response to changes in viscosity is different for each system. cytochrome c ͉ dynamics ͉ hemoglobin ͉ myoglobin ͉ cytochrome c peroxidase T he long-range transfer of a single electron from donor to acceptor in a condensed phase is a fascinating and widely studied process (1, 2). Much of this work seeks to understand the electron transfer (ET) process itself. However, when the ET event involves a dynamic protein-protein interface, the observed kinetics frequently are controlled not by the ET process itself, but by the dynamics of recognition and binding and͞or conversion within an ensemble of bound configurations (3, 4).Studies of interprotein ET (3, 5-10) began with the implicit assumption of a protein-protein binding-energy landscape with a single reactive complex (Fig. 1A Left), implying a direct correlation between binding and reactivity. When the landscape for complex formation has several discrete minima ( Fig. 1 A Center) the reactive conformation may differ from the most stable one, in which case the observed ET kinetics are controlled by the rates and͞or energetics of conformational conversion within a complex (11-13). Recent studies of ET between myoglobin (Mb) and cytochrome b 5 (Fe 3ϩ b 5 ), which bind to each other by weak electrostatic interactions, disclosed a new dynamic docking paradigm in protein-protein reaction dynamics: the landscape involves numerous configurations of similar affinity, only a subset of which is active in ET (Fig. 1 A Right) (4, 14).A majority of these studies have used a photocycle in which laser-flash excitation of the metallo-porphyrin in a metalsubstituted (M ϭ Zn or Mg) hemoprotein to its triplet excited state ( 3 D) triggers ET from the triplet to the metal center of an acceptor protein (A) across a protein-protein interface, with rate constant, k f , Eq. 1:[1]The acceptor metal center of A typically is a ferri-heme center, Given the exponentially steep fall-off in the matrix element for ET between the two redox centers (19,20), there will be only a subset of conformation...