No abstract

Background and Aims Many children with primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) receive oral vancomycin therapy (OVT) or ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA). There is a paucity of data on whether these medications improve outcomes. Approach and Results We analyzed retrospective data from the Pediatric PSC Consortium. Children treated with OVT were matched 1:1:1 to those treated with UDCA or managed with observation (no treatment) based on the closest propensity score, ensuring similar baseline characteristics. Two hundred sixty‐four patients (88 each with OVT, UDCA, or observation) had matching propensity scores and were similar in demographics, phenotype, immunosuppression, baseline biochemistry, and hepatic fibrosis. After 1 year in an intention‐to‐treat analysis, all outcome metrics were similar regardless of treatment group. In OVT, UDCA, and untreated groups, respectively: Gamma‐glutamyltransferase normalized in 53%, 49%, and 52% (P = not significant [NS]), liver fibrosis stage was improved in 20%, 13%, and 18% and worsened in 11%, 29%, and 18% (P = NS), and the 5‐year probability of liver transplant listing was 21%, 10%, and 12% (P = NS). Favorable outcome was associated with having a mild phenotype of PSC and minimal hepatic fibrosis. Conclusions We presented the largest‐ever description of outcomes on OVT in PSC and compared them to carefully matched patients on UDCA or no therapy. Neither OVT nor UDCA showed improvement in outcomes compared to a strategy of observation. Patients progressed to end‐stage liver disease at similar rates. Spontaneous normalization of biochemistry is common in children receiving no therapy, particularly in the majority of children with a mild phenotype and an early stage of disease. Placebo‐controlled treatment trials are needed to identify effective treatments for pediatric PSC.

Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and ultrasound (US) are the most commonly used tools for detecting non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). No direct comparison of these two modalities in children exists. We aimed to compare head-to-head the diagnostic accuracy of ALT and US and their combination for detecting NAFLD in children with obesity. Ninety-nine children with severe obesity underwent simultaneous serum-ALT and abdominal ultrasound (US steatosis score 0–3). Proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy was used as reference standard for detecting steatosis/NAFLD. ROC curve analyses were performed to determine diagnostic performance and to determine optimum screening cut-points aiming for a specificity ≥ 80%. The area under the ROC (AUROC) of ALT and US were not significantly different (0.74 and 0.70, respectively). At the optimal ALT threshold (≥40 IU/L), sensitivity was 44% and specificity was 89%. At the optimal US steatosis score (≥ 2), sensitivity was 51% and specificity was 80%. Combining ALT and US did not result in better accuracy than ALT or US alone. Conclusion : ALT and US have comparable and only moderate diagnostic accuracy for detecting hepatic steatosis in children with obesity. A stepwise screening strategy combining both methods does not improve diagnostic accuracy. What is Known: • Alanine aminotransferase ( ALT ) and ultrasound ( US ) are the most commonly used tools for detecting non-alcoholic fatty liver disease ( NAFLD ) . • ALT and ultrasound have mediocre accuracy in detecting steatosis in children with obesity. What is New: • In a head-to-head comparison, the difference in diagnostic accuracy of ALT and ultrasound in detecting steatosis is not significant. • A stepwise screening strategy combining both methods does not improve diagnostic accuracy .