The Pannonian Basin in southeastern Europe is heavily used for rain-fed agriculture. The region experienced several droughts in the last years, causing major yield losses. Ongoing climate change, characterised by increasing temperatures and potential evapotranspiration, and by changes in precipitation distribution will likely increase the frequency and intensity of drought episodes in the future. Hence, ongoing monitoring of droughts and estimation of their impact on agriculture is necessary to adapt agricultural practices to changing weather and climate extremes. Several regional initiatives, projects and online tools have been established to facilitate drought monitoring and management in the Pannonian Basin. However, reliable systems to forecast potential drought impacts on plant productivity and agricultural yields at monthly to seasonal scales are only in their infancy, as plant response to climatic extremes is still poorly understood. With the increasing availability of high-resolution and long-term Earth Observation (EO) data and recent progress in machine learning and artificial intelligence, further improvements in drought monitoring and impact prediction capacities are expected. Here we review the current state of drought monitoring in the Pannonian Basin, identify EO-based variables to potentially improve regional drought impact monitoring and outline future perspectives for seasonal forecasts of drought impacts on agriculture.

Abstract. Climate models' outputs are affected by biases that need to be detected and adjusted to model climate impacts. Many climate hazards and climate-related impacts are associated with the interaction between multiple drivers, i.e. by compound events. So far climate model biases are typically assessed based on the hazard of interest, and it is unclear how much a potential bias in the dependence of the hazard drivers contributes to the overall bias and how the biases in the drivers interact. Here, based on copula theory, we develop a multivariate bias-assessment framework, which allows for disentangling the biases in hazard indicators in terms of the underlying univariate drivers and their statistical dependence. Based on this framework, we dissect biases in fire and heat stress hazards in a suite of global climate models by considering two simplified hazard indicators: the wet-bulb globe temperature (WBGT) and the Chandler burning index (CBI). Both indices solely rely on temperature and relative humidity. The spatial pattern of the hazard indicators is well represented by climate models. However, substantial biases exist in the representation of extreme conditions, especially in the CBI (spatial average of absolute bias: 21 ∘C) due to the biases driven by relative humidity (20 ∘C). Biases in WBGT (1.1 ∘C) are small compared to the biases driven by temperature (1.9 ∘C) and relative humidity (1.4 ∘C), as the two biases compensate for each other. In many regions, also biases related to the statistical dependence (0.85 ∘C) are important for WBGT, which indicates that well-designed physically based multivariate bias adjustment procedures should be considered for hazards and impacts that depend on multiple drivers. The proposed compound-event-oriented evaluation of climate model biases is easily applicable to other hazard types. Furthermore, it can contribute to improved present and future risk assessments through increasing our understanding of the biases' sources in the simulation of climate impacts.

Abstract. Climate models' outputs are affected by biases that need to be detected and adjusted to model climate impacts. Many climate hazards and climate-related impacts are associated with the interaction between multiple drivers, i.e. by compound events. So far climate model biases are typically assessed based on the hazard of interest, and it is unclear how much a potential bias in the dependence of the hazard drivers contributes to the overall bias and how the biases in the drivers interact. Here, based on copula theory, we develop a multivariate bias assessment framework, which allows for disentangling the biases in hazard indicators in terms of the underlying univariate drivers and their statistical dependence. Based on this framework, we dissect biases in fire and heat stress hazards in a suite of global climate models by considering two simplified hazard indicators, the wet-bulb globe temperature (WBGT) and the Chandler Burning Index (CBI). Both indices solely rely on temperature and relative humidity. The spatial pattern of the hazards indicators is well represented by climate models. However, substantial biases exist in the representation of extreme conditions, especially in the CBI (spatial average of absolute bias: 21 °C) due to the biases driven by relative humidity (20 °C). Biases in WBGT (1.1 °C) are small compared to the biases driven by temperature (1.9 °C) and relative humidity (1.4 °C), as the two biases compensate each other. In many regions, also biases related to the statistical dependence (0.85 °C) are important for WBGT, which indicates that well-designed physically-based multivariate bias adjustment should be considered for hazards and impacts that depend on multiple drivers. The proposed compound event-oriented evaluation of climate model biases is easily applicable to other hazard types. Furthermore, it can contribute to improved present and future risk assessments through increasing our understanding of the biases’ sources in the simulation of climate impacts.

Global navigation satellite systems (GNSS) provide globally distributed station coordinate time series that can be used for a variety of applications such as the definition of a terrestrial reference frame. A reliable estimation of the coordinate time series trends gives valuable information about station movements during the measured time period. Detecting discontinuities of various origins in such time series is crucial for accurate and robust velocity estimation. At present, there is no fully automated standard method for detecting discontinuities. Instead, discontinuity-catalogues are frequently used, which provide information about when a device was changed or an earthquake occurred. However, it is known that these catalogues suffer from incompleteness. This study investigates the suitability of machine learning classification algorithms that are fully data-driven to detect discontinuities caused by earthquakes in station coordinate time series without the need for external information. For this study, Japan was selected as a testing area. Ten different machine learning algorithms have been tested. It is found that Random Forest achieves the best performance with an F1 score of 0.77, a recall of 0.78, and a precision of 0.76. Overall, 525 of 565 recorded earthquakes in the test data were correctly classified. It is further highlighted that splitting the time series into chunks of 21 days leads to the best performance. Furthermore, it is beneficial to combine the three (normalized) components of the GNSS solution into one sample, and that adding the value range as an additional feature improves the result. Thus, this work demonstrates how it is possible to use machine learning algorithms to detect discontinuities in GNSS time series.

Abstract. Remote sensing of water vapour using the Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) is a well-established technique and reliable data source for numerical weather prediction (NWP). However, one of the phenomena rarely studied using GNSS are foehn winds. Since foehn winds are associated with significant humidity gradients between two sides of a mountain range, tropospheric estimates from GNSS are also affected by their occurrence. Time series reveal characteristic features like distinctive minima and maxima as well as a significant decrease in the correlation between the stations. However, detecting such signals becomes increasingly difficult for large datasets. Therefore, we suggest the application of machine learning algorithms for the detection and prediction of foehn events by means of GNSS troposphere products. This initial study develops a new, machine learning-based method for detection and prediction of foehn events at the Swiss station Altdorf by utilising long-term time series of high-quality GNSS troposphere products. Data from the Automated GNSS Network Switzerland (AGNES) and various GNSS sites from neighbouring countries as well as records of an operational foehn index are used to investigate the performance of several different classification algorithms based on appropriate statistical metrics. The two best-performing algorithms are fine tuned and tested in four dedicated experiments using different feature setups. The results are promising, especially when reprocessed GNSS products are utilised and the most dense station setup is used. Detection- and alarm-based measures reach levels between 66 %–80 % for both tested algorithms and thus are comparable to those from studies using data from meteorological stations and NWP. For operational prediction, limitations due to the availability and quality of GNSS products in near-real time (NRT) exist. However, they might be mitigated to a significant extent by provision of additional NRT products and improved data processing in the future. Results also outline benefits for the results when including geographically relevant stations (e.g. high-altitude stations) in the utilised datasets.