Efficacy for treatment of GAD has been established for several different drug classes. At present, based on clear efficacy and good tolerability, first-line treatment with either a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) or a serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (SNRI) is indicated. If an initial, at least moderate, clinical response is achieved under antidepressant therapy, treatment should be at least continued for 12 months.

Management of benzodiazepine discontinuation can be facilitated significantly by co-prescribing imipramine before and during the benzodiazepine taper. Daily benzodiazepine dose, severity of baseline symptoms of anxiety and depression, and duration of benzodiazepine use were additional significant predictors of successful taper outcome.

A previous report suggested that 5 weeks of continued treatment with 20 mg of fluoxetine was approximately as effective as double-blind titration to a dose of 60 mg in patients who had failed to respond to 3 weeks of initial treatment at 20 mg. The current study was undertaken to evaluate whether 150 mg of sertraline was any more effective than 50 mg in treating depressed patients who were non-responders at 3 weeks. Ninety-one outpatients with DSM-IV major depressive disorder who had a 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D) score > or = 18 were treated with open label sertraline for 3 weeks. Patients who did not achieve remission (defined as 17-item HAM-D total score < or = 8 by week 3) were then randomized to 5 more weeks of double-blind treatment with either 50 mg of sertraline or immediate titration to 150 mg of sertraline. Efficacy was assessed at each visit with the HAM-D, Clinical Global Impressions (CGI)-severity and improvement scale, and the Hopkins Symptom Checklist. There were no significant between-group differences in clinical or demographic features at baseline for the three treatment groups. After 3 weeks of open-label treatment, 16 patients were not randomized, of whom 11 (69%) met responder criteria. The remaining patients were randomized, double-blind, to 50 mg of sertraline (n = 37; HAM-D = 19.2 +/- 5.0) or 150 mg of sertraline (n = 38; HAM-D = 18.4 +/- 5.0). PROC-Mixed analyses found no significant difference in slopes for any outcome measure when comparing 50 mg and 150 mg sertraline treatment groups. At week 8 (LOCF), the overall remission rate (HAM-D < or = 8) for 3-week non-responders was 40%, with no statistically significant between-group difference for the 50 mg versus 150 mg doses of sertraline (P > 0.10). A completer analysis yielded similar results. Adverse events were mostly mild on both doses of sertraline and led to few treatment discontinuations. The results suggest that for most patients continued treatment with 50 mg dose of sertraline yields a rate of antidepressant response that is comparable to what is achieved by dose escalation from 50 mg to 150 mg of sertraline after 3 weeks of treatment. While some patients clearly benefit from higher doses, the results of the current study are consistent with the lack of any evidence for a dose-response curve with sertraline in the treatment of depression.

Anxiety disorders are the most common mental illnesses in the United States. Despite having a number of medication options readily available, benzodiazepines (BZs) and antidepressants have achieved remission rates of only 35% after 8 weeks of acute treatment. In the development of new anxiolytics, particularly those that affect the gamma-aminobutyric acid system, it is essential to assess the new compound's potential to cause discontinuation symptoms after stopping the medication as part of both short- and long-term treatment. This report describes the development of the 20-item Penn Physician Withdrawal Checklist (PWC), a smaller version of the original 35-item PWC, and examines its validity, internal consistency, test-retest and interrater reliability, and factor structure. The PWC scores, assessed at the peak of withdrawal severity, were selected from 143 of our patients for an orthogonal factor analysis. Our results suggest that the Penn Physician Withdrawal Checklist is a simple and accurate method to assess anxiolytic discontinuation symptoms.

Benzodiazepines have been shown to have broad-spectrum activity, rapid onset of action, and a wide therapeutic window compared with other anxiolytic medications. Yet the use of benzodiazepines has been limited by concern regarding dependence, withdrawal, and abuse. Agents such as antidepressants, serotonergic anxiolytics, anticonvulsants, and beta-blockers have been used with varying degrees of success to help facilitate the tapering of benzodiazepines. Carbamazepine, imipramine, valproate, and trazodone have been beneficial in the management of benzodiazepine discontinuation, but not in decreasing the severity of benzodiazepine withdrawal. A stepwise approach to discontinuing benzodiazepines is offered.

This 8-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, flexible-dose trial assessed the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of ziprasidone in adults with treatment-resistant generalized anxiety disorder (GAD). Seventy-three subjects with treatment-resistant GAD were recruited, and 62 were randomized to either ziprasidone or placebo treatment at a ratio of 2:1 using a flexible dosing strategy (20-80 mg daily). Randomization was stratified into 2 subtypes of patients, those in whom the study drug was used as augmentation and those who have stopped their ineffective medications before entering the present trial (nonaugmented group). The subjects' clinical status was monitored weekly throughout the course of the study and included the Hamilton Anxiety Scale (primary outcome measure), the Clinical Global Impression Improvement and Severity of Illness scales, the Hamilton Depression Scale, the Sheehan Disability Scale, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, and the Abnormal Involuntary Movements Scale. Sixty-two patients were randomized to ziprasidone (n = 41) or placebo (n = 21). The dropout rate was 24%, consisting of 2 placebo patients and 13 ziprasidone patients. There was no statistically significant difference in the Hamilton Anxiety Scale score reduction between the drug and placebo groups. However, statistical trends were observed for an augmentation-study medication interaction effect, with ziprasidone patients producing more improvement in the nonaugmented than in the augmented group. This study provides pilot data for an augmentation-study medication interaction effect with ziprasidone patients producing more improvement in the nonaugmented than in the augmented group. Based on the data obtained in this trial and the subsequent power analyses, a future double-blind placebo-controlled trial should include at least 150 treatment-resistant GAD nonaugmented patients randomized to ziprasidone and placebo in a 1:1 ratio.

This randomized, double-blind clinical trial involving 198 generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) patients was conducted to more clearly define gepirone's role for the treatment of anxiety in daily dosages of 10 to 45 mg compared with diazepam and placebo. A secondary goal was to test for possible discontinuation symptoms after abrupt discontinuation of therapy. After a 1-week washout period, patients were treated for 8 weeks and then abruptly shifted under single-blind conditions for 2 weeks on placebo. The highest attrition rate occurred with patients on gepirone (58%) and the lowest on diazepam (34%). Medication intake for week 4 was 19.5 +/- 12.5 mg/day diazepam and 19.0 +/- 11.5 mg/day gepirone and was similar at week 8. The major adverse events were light-headedness, nausea, and insomnia for gepirone and drowsiness and fatigue for diazepam. Clinical improvement data showed gepirone's anxiolytic response to be delayed, being significant from placebo beginning at week 6, whereas diazepam caused significantly more relief than placebo from week 1 onward. Taper results showed that only diazepam, but not gepirone, caused a temporary worsening of anxiety symptoms or rebound.

The data available in the literature so far indicate clinical efficacy over placebo and a rather benign adverse event profile. Whether the early onset of clinical efficacy observed in one of the two pivotal studies represents a true or only a chance phenomenon, only future studies can tell. Adverse effects are mostly mild-moderate and most GI type AEs disappear in about one week, at a time when all patients are still on a clinically suboptimal daily dosage (10 mg/d during the first week). Sexual AEs did not differ from placebo. Vilazodone represents an interesting addition to the arsenal of available antidepressants.