The results demonstrate that responding for BSR is not associated with EtOH preference, insofar as alcohol-preferring and -nonpreferring rats respond similarly under an array of reinforcement schedules and current intensities. In contrast, genetic selection for EtOH preference is highly associated with responding for a palatable sucrose reward, and the relation increases as the reward cost for the sucrose increases. These findings suggest that similar/overlapping mechanisms of action regulate the reinforcing properties of EtOH and sucrose but that overlapping yet distinct neuronal mechanism may modulate the reward characteristics of BSR and EtOH preference.

The bed nucleus of the stria terminalis (BNST) has been reported to release increased levels of extracellular dopamine (DA) following the systemic administration of abused drugs in outbred rats. This study examined the BNST as a novel locus for supporting operant responding for brain stimulation reward (BSR) in rats bred for alcohol preference while determining any potentiating effects of ethanol (EtOH) (0.125-1.25 g/kg, i.p.) and amphetamine (0.25-1.60 mg/kg, i.p.) on BSR within the BNST. Also examined was the capability of D1 receptor blockade to attenuate any observed potentiation. Following surgical implantation, alcohol-preferring (P) and non-preferring (NP) rats responded to a range of descending frequencies (300-20 Hz) as evaluated by a rate-frequency paradigm. The results revealed that the BNST was capable of supporting BSR in P but not NP rats. Also, amphetamine pretreatment produced a significant leftward shift in the rate-frequency function in P rats with significant reductions observed in three other measures of reward threshold, while EtOH only lowered the minimum frequency needed to produce responding. The effects of systemic amphetamine were successfully attenuated by the unilateral infusion of the D1 receptor antagonist SCH 23390 (5.0 microg) into the contralateral nucleus accumbens. The results suggest the BNST is capable of supporting BSR performance in P, but not NP rats, possibly due to increased sensitivity to the electrical stimulation-induced DA release of BSR in the innately DA "deficient" limbic system of P rats.

Differences in the mesolimbic dopamine (DA) pathway that regulates alcohol preference may also increase sensitivity to the reinforcing effects of other drugs of abuse. In the present study, the curve-shift (rate-frequency) paradigm was used to quantify the interaction of amphetamine with the rewarding effects of lateral hypothalamic brain stimulation reward (BSR) in alcohol-preferring (P) and -nonpreferring (NP) rats. The role of D-sub-1 and D-sub-2 DA receptors of the nucleus accumbens (NAcc) in mediating the reward-potentiating effects of amphetamine was also determined. Animals were tested with randomly administered amphetamine (0.25, 0.75, 1.25 mg/kg ip), DA-receptor antagonists (SCH 23390 [2.0 microg, 5.0 microg]; eticlopride [2.0 microg, 5.0 microg]), or a combination of the 2 (SCH 23390 [2.0 microg, 5.0 microg] + 0.75 mg/kg amphetamine; eticlopride [2.0 microg, 5.0 microg] + 0.75 mg/kg amphetamine). Amphetamine produced comparable dose-related leftward shifts in the rate-frequency function for both P and NP rats, with a greater than 60% reduction observed in BSR threshold. On intervening days, baseline threshold was unaltered between tests and similar between rat lines. Unilateral infusion in the NAcc of either the D-sub-1 or D-sub-2 receptor antagonist produced rightward shifts in the rate-frequency function of amphetamine, completely reversing-attenuating its reward-enhancing effects. The results demonstrate that amphetamine produces similar threshold-lowering effects in both P and NP rats and that the reward-potentiating effects of amphetamine do not correlate with alcohol preference under the conditions of the present study.