Since its introduction electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) has received varied responses from the public and the media. Even though it is an effective treatment, its use has been restricted to very few serious psychiatric disorders. In this paper, Dr Guruvaiah and colleagues capture patients' and their carers' positive experience and attitude towards ECT following their treatment, which can act as reassurance for patients undergoing this efficacious therapy.
Borderline personality disorder (BPD) is a relatively new concept whichhas received much attention recently. In ICD10, emotionally unstable personality disorder, is subcategorised as impulsive type and borderline type. According to DSM IV diagnosis of BPD requires at least five out of nine features. Antipsychotics is effective in reducing affective instability, anger and psychotic symptoms. Beneficial effects were found with mood stabilisers such as semisodium valproate, lamotrigine and topiramate, but not carbamazepine. Psychological treatment is considered as first line treatment for borderline patients but the evidence is not extensive for most of the therapies except for dialectical behavioural therapy.
Culture plays a central role in illness experience and behaviour and has a strong influence on the ways in which mental illnesses are expressed. Hence, understanding culture is crucial for mental health professionals to deliver effective care. This slim volume discusses some of the complex issues faced by clinicians responding to cultural diversity in mental health. Twenty brief chapters by clinicians as well as one service user address some of the challenges in the provision of psychological treatments to culturally diverse populations.Several chapters discuss issues related to assessment and diagnosis and the use of interpreters in delivering psychological therapies. One chapter addresses the importance of incorporating spiritual/religious history in psychiatric assessment and treatment to provide a new dimension to mental health care. Another interesting chapter elaborates the broad concept of "well being" and questions the applicability of traditional biomedical approaches to assessment, diagnosis, and treatment to the recovery, well-being, liberation-focused models. The book also discusses the epistemic mismatch that may hamper psychotherapy and considers how it can be transformed into mutual enrichment for the patient and therapist. The contributors draw attention to the existence of implicit racism and its influence in the diagnosis and management of mental illness. In addition, there is a discussion about the difficulties in addressing the inequalities in the social determinants of illness with one common public health policy.The book raises many thought-provoking questions: To what extent are current, standard diagnostic criteria applicable or adaptable to all cultures? If they are not, how can we arrive at common cross-cultural diagnostic criteria? Is this goal even feasible? It seems that in many contexts cultural factors are ignored-for example, practitioners working in war and conflict zones diagnose posttraumatic stress disorder but there is no provision in current nosology to address the key issues of collective trauma and social coping. With regard to treatment, are current practices in the prescription of medication broadly applicable, without taking into account various ethnic and cultural factors? Similarly, how do current techniques of cognitive behavioural therapy consider cultural, language, and ethnic differences?
Various ictal (during the seizure) behaviour patterns have been described in patients with epilepsy. Here, Drs Guruvaiah and Veerasamy describe unusual high‐risk ictal behaviours with the appearance of suicidal gestures in a patient who was subsequently given a diagnosis of temporal lobe epilepsy.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.