EMIPARESIS REPRESENTS THE dominant functionally limiting symptom in 80% of patients with acute stroke. 1 Within 2 to 5 months after a stroke, patients recover a variable degree of function, depending on the magnitude of the initial deficit. 1 Several studies have demonstrated that recovery is associated with reorganization of central nervous system networks. 2,3 Functional brain imaging of paretic movement during the recovery period has shown recruitment of cortex immediately adjacent to the stroke cavity along with intact cortical areas within the lesioned and in the uninjured contralesional hemisphere. 4,5 The pattern of recruitment depends on the severity of impairment, 6 lesion location, 7 and time since stroke. 8 The factors that initiate and maintain cortical reorganization are not known. Imaging data suggest that circuitry in motor cortices on both sides of the brain is modified during recovery. 2
Background and Purpose-Physical inactivity propagates disability after stroke through physical deconditioning and learned nonuse. We investigated whether treadmill aerobic training (T-AEX) is more effective than conventional rehabilitation to improve ambulatory function and cardiovascular fitness in patients with chronic stroke. Methods-Sixty-one adults with chronic hemiparetic gait after ischemic stroke (Ͼ6 months) were randomized to 6 months (3ϫ/week) progressive T-AEX or a reference rehabilitation program of stretching plus low-intensity walking (R-CONTROL). Peak exercise capacity (VO 2 peak), O 2 consumption during submaximal effort walking (economy of gait), timed walks, Walking Impairment Questionnaire (WIQ), and Rivermead Mobility Index (RMI) were measured before and after 3 and 6 months of training. Results-Twenty-five patients completed T-AEX and 20 completed R-CONTROL. Only T-AEX increased cardiovascular fitness (17% versus 3%, ␦% T-AEX versus R-CONTROL, PϽ0.005). Group-by-time analyses revealed T-AEXimproved ambulatory performance on 6-minute walks (30% versus 11%, PϽ0.02) and mobility function indexed by WIQ distance scores (56% versus 12%, PϽ0.05). In the T-AEX group, increasing training velocity predicted improved VO 2 peak (rϭ0.43, PϽ0.05), but not walking function. In contrast, increasing training session duration predicted improved 6-minute walk (rϭ0.41, PϽ0.05), but not fitness gains. Conclusions-T-AEX
In this paper, we present the design and characterization of a novel ankle robot developed at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). This robotic module is being tested with stroke patients at Baltimore Veterans Administration Medical Center. The purpose of the ongoing study is to train stroke survivors to overcome common foot drop and balance problems in order to improve their ambulatory performance. Its design follows the same guidelines of our upper extremity designs, i.e., it is a low friction, backdriveable device with intrinsically low mechanical impedance. Here, we report on the design and mechanical characteristics of the robot. We also present data to demonstrate the potential of this device as an efficient clinical measurement tool to estimate intrinsic ankle properties. Given the importance of the ankle during locomotion, an accurate estimate of ankle stiffness would be a valuable asset for locomotor rehabilitation. Our initial ankle stiffness estimates compare favorably with previously published work, indicating that our method may serve as an accurate clinical measurement tool.
Background and Purpose This randomized controlled trial tests the efficacy of bilateral arm training with rhythmic auditory cueing (BATRAC) versus dose-matched therapeutic exercises (DMTEs) on upper-extremity (UE) function in stroke survivors and uses functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to examine effects on cortical reorganization. Methods A total of 111 adults with chronic UE paresis were randomized to 6 weeks (3×/week) of BATRAC or DMTE. Primary end points of UE assessments of Fugl-Meyer UE Test (FM) and modified Wolf Motor Function Test Time (WT) were performed 6 weeks prior to and at baseline, after training, and 4 months later. Pretraining and posttraining, fMRI for UE movement was evaluated in 17 BATRAC and 21 DMTE participants. Results The improvements in UE function (BATRAC: FM Δ = 1.1 + 0.5, P = .03; WT Δ = −2.6 + 0.8, P < .00; DMTE: FM Δ = 1.9 + 0.4, P < .00; WT Δ = −1.6 + 0.7; P = .04) were comparable between groups and retained after 4 months. Satisfaction was higher after BATRAC than DMTE (P = .003). BATRAC led to significantly higher increase in activation in ipsilesional precentral, anterior cingulate and postcentral gyri, and supplementary motor area and contralesional superior frontal gyrus (P < .05). Activation change in the latter was correlated with improvement in the WMFT (P = .01). Conclusions BATRAC is not superior to DMTE, but both rehabilitation programs durably improve motor function for individuals with chronic UE hemiparesis and with varied deficit severity. Adaptations in brain activation are greater after BATRAC than DMTE, suggesting that given similar benefits to motor function, these therapies operate through different mechanisms.
Here we show that the linear and angular kinematics of the ankle, knee, and hip joints during both normal and precision (attentive) human treadmill walking can be inferred from noninvasive scalp electroencephalography (EEG) with decoding accuracies comparable to those from neural decoders based on multiple single-unit activities (SUAs) recorded in nonhuman primates. Six healthy adults were recorded. Participants were asked to walk on a treadmill at their self-selected comfortable speed while receiving visual feedback of their lower limbs (i.e., precision walking), to repeatedly avoid stepping on a strip drawn on the treadmill belt. Angular and linear kinematics of the left and right hip, knee, and ankle joints and EEG were recorded, and neural decoders were designed and optimized with cross-validation procedures. Of note, the optimal set of electrodes of these decoders were also used to accurately infer gait trajectories in a normal walking task that did not require subjects to control and monitor their foot placement. Our results indicate a high involvement of a fronto-posterior cortical network in the control of both precision and normal walking and suggest that EEG signals can be used to study in real time the cortical dynamics of walking and to develop brain-machine interfaces aimed at restoring human gait function. brain computer interface; brain-machine interface; electroencephalography LITTLE IS KNOWN about the organization, neural network mechanisms, and computations underlying the control of walking in humans (Choi and Bastian 2007). Although central pattern generators for locomotion are important in the control of walking, supraspinal networks, including the brain stem, cerebellum, and cortex, must be critical, as demonstrated by the changing motor and cognitive (i.e., spatial attention) demands imposed by bipedal walking in unknown or cluttered dynamic environments (Choi and Bastian 2007;Grillner et al. 2008;Nielsen 2003;Rossignol et al. 2007). Neuroimaging studies show that rhythmic foot or leg movements recruit primary motor cortex (Christensen et al. 2001;Dobkin et al. 2004;Heuninckx et al. 2005Heuninckx et al. , 2008Luft et al. 2002;Sahyoun et al. 2004), whereas electrophysiological investigations demonstrate electrocortical potentials related to lower limb movements (Wieser et al. 2010), as well as a greater involvement of human cortex during steady-speed locomotion than previously thought (Gwin et al. , 2011. In this regard, studies using functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) show involvement of frontal, premotor, and supplementary motor areas during walking (Harada et al. 2009;Miyai et al. 2001;Suzuki et al. 2004Suzuki et al. , 2008. That primary sensorimotor cortices carry information about bipedal locomotion has been directly proven by the work of Nicolelis and colleagues (Fitzsimmons et al. 2009), who demonstrated that chronic recordings from ensembles of cortical neurons in primary motor (M1) and primary somatosensory (S1) cortices can be used to predict the kinematics of bipedal wa...
This trial demonstrates that TAEX effectively improves cardiovascular fitness and gait in persons with chronic stroke.
Background and Purpose-Stroke often impairs gait thereby reducing mobility and fitness and promoting chronic disability. Gait is a complex sensorimotor function controlled by integrated cortical, subcortical, and spinal networks. The mechanisms of gait recovery after stroke are not well understood. This study examines the hypothesis that progressive task-repetitive treadmill exercise (T-EX) improves fitness and gait function in subjects with chronic hemiparetic stroke by inducing adaptations in the brain (plasticity). Methods-A randomized controlled trial determined the effects of 6-month T-EX (nϭ37) versus comparable duration stretching (CON, nϭ34) on walking, aerobic fitness and in a subset (nϭ15/17) on brain activation measured by functional MRI. Results-T-EX significantly improved treadmill-walking velocity by 51% and cardiovascular fitness by 18% (11% and Ϫ3% for CON, respectively; PϽ0.05). T-EX but not CON affected brain activation during paretic, but not during nonparetic limb movement, showing 72% increased activation in posterior cerebellar lobe and 18% in midbrain (PϽ0.005). Exercise-mediated improvements in walking velocity correlated with increased activation in cerebellum and midbrain. Conclusions-T-EX improves walking, fitness and recruits cerebellum-midbrain circuits, likely reflecting neural network plasticity. This neural recruitment is associated with better walking. These findings demonstrate the effectiveness of T-EX rehabilitation in promoting gait recovery of stroke survivors with long-term mobility impairment and provide evidence of neuroplastic mechanisms that could lead to further refinements in these paradigms to improve functional outcomes. (Stroke. 2008;39:3341-3350.)
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.