Senescence in plants is usually viewed as an intemally programmed degeneration leading to death. It is a developmental process that occurs in many different tissues and serves different purposes. Generally, apoptosis refers to programmed death of small numbers of animal cells, and it shows some special features at the cell level. Some senescing plant cells show some symptoms typical of apoptosis, while others do not. This review will focus primarily on leaf senescence with ultimate aim of explaining whole plant senescence (i.e., monocarpic senescence). Traditionally, the ideas on senescence mechanisms fall into two major groupings, nutrient deficiencies (e.g., starvation) and genetic programming (i.e., senescence-promoting and senescence-inhibiting genes). Considerable evidence indicates that nutrient deficiencies are not central senescence program components, while increasing evidence supports genetic programming. Because chlorophyll (Chi) and chloroplast (CP) breakdown are so prominent, leaf senescence is generally measured in terms of Chi loss. Although CP breakdown may not be the proximate cause of leaf cell death, it certainly is important as a source of nutrients for use elsewhere, e.g., for developing reproductive structures in monocarpic plants, and this loss limits assimilatory capacity. The CP is dismantled in an orderly sequence. Individual protein complexes seem to be taken out all at once, not one subunit at a time. Removal of any component, e.g., Chi, seems to destabilize the whole complex. It is of special interest that senescing CPs secrete Chl-containing globules indicating that some CP components are broken down outside the CP. Senescence appears to be imposed on the CP by the nucleus, and all the known senescencealtering genes except one, cytG in soybean, are nuclear. Only the djd2 mutation(s) in soybean prevents a broad range of leaf senescence processes. Exactly, what causes cell death is unclear; however, the selective thiol protease inhibitor, E-64, does delay death, and this suggests that proteases play a key role.

No abstract

Senescence in plants is usually viewed as an internally programmed degeneration leading to death. It is a developmental process that occurs in many different tissues and serves different purposes. Generally, apoptosis refers to programmed death of small numbers of animal cells, and it shows some special features at the cell level. Some senescing plant cells show some symptoms typical of apoptosis, while others do not. This review will focus primarily on leaf senescence with ultimate aim of explaining whole plant senescence (i.e., monocarpic senescence). Traditionally, the ideas on senescence mechanisms fall into two major groupings, nutrient deficiencies (e.g., starvation) and genetic programming (i.e., senescence‐promoting and senescence‐inhibiting genes). Considerable evidence indicates that nutrient deficiencies are not central senescence program components, while increasing evidence supports genetic programming. Because chlorophyll (Chl) and chloroplast (CP) breakdown are so prominent, leaf senescence is generally measured in terms of Chl loss. Although CP breakdown may not be the proximate cause of leaf cell death, it certainly is important as a source of nutrients for use elsewhere, e.g., for developing reproductive structures in monocarpic plants, and this loss limits assimilatory capacity. The CP is dismantled in an orderly sequence. Individual protein complexes seem to be taken out all at once, not one subunit at a time. Removal of any component, e.g., Chl, seems to destabilize the whole complex. It is of special interest that senescing CPs secrete Chl‐containing globules indicating that some CP components are broken down outside the CP. Senescence appears to be imposed on the CP by the nucleus, and all the known senescence‐altering genes except one, cytG in soybean, are nuclear. Only the d1d2 mutation(s) in soybean prevents a broad range of leaf senescence processes. Exactly, what causes cell death is unclear; however, the selective thiol protease inhibitor, E‐64, does delay death, and this suggests that proteases play a key role.

Like most monocarpic plants, longevity of Arabidopsis thaliana plants is controlled by the reproductive structures; however, they appear to work differently from most dicots studied. Neither male- and female-sterility mutations (ms1-1 and bell1, respectively) nor surgical removal of the stems with inflorescences (bolts) at various stages significantly increased the longevity of individual rosette leaves, yet the mutants and treated plants lived 20-50 d longer, measured by the death of the last rosette and/or the last cauline leaf. A series of growth mutations (clv2-4, clv3-2, det3, vam1 enh, and dark green) also increased plant longevity by 20-30 d but did not delay the overall development of the plants. The mutations prolonged plant life through the production of new leaves and stems with inflorescences (bolts) rather than by extending leaf longevity. In growing stems, the newly-formed leaves may induce senescence in the older leaves; however, removal of the younger leaves did not significantly increase the life of the older leaves on the compressed stems of Arabidopsis. Since plants that produce more bolts also live longer, the reproductive load (dry weight) of the bolts did not seem to drive leaf or whole plant senescence here. The developing reproductive structures caused the death of the plant by preventing regeneration of leaves and bolts, which are green and presumably photosynthetic. They also exerted a correlative control (repression) on the development of additional reproductive structures.

No abstract

No abstract

Cytokinins (CKs) coming from the roots via the xylem are known to delay leaf senescence, and their decline may be important in the senescence of soybean (Glycine max) plants during pod development (monocarpic senescence). Therefore, using radioimmunoassay of highly purified CKs, we quantified the zeatin (Z), zeatin riboside (ZR), the dihydro derivatives (DZ, DZR), the 0-glucosides, and DZ nucleotide in xylem sap collected from root stocks under pressure at various stages of pod development. Z, ZR, DZ, and DZR dropped sharply during early pod development to levels below those expected to retard senescence. Pod removal at full extension, which delayed leaf senescence, caused an increase in xylem sap CKs (particularly ZR and DZR), while depodding at late podfill, which did not delay senescence, likewise did not increase the CK levels greatly. The levels of the 0-glucosides and the DZ nucleotide were relatively low, and they showed less change with senescence or depodding. The differences in the responses of individual CKs to senescence and depodding suggest differences in their metabolism. Judging from their activity, concentrations and response to depodding, DZR and ZR may be the most important senescence retardants in soybean xylem sap. These data also suggest that the pods can depress CK production by the roots at an early stage and this decrease in CK production is required for monocarpic senescence in soybean.CK2 appears to be the major senescence-retarding hormone in plants, and its role in leaves is particularly important (30). Nonetheless, there is little integrated information on the CK hormone systems regulating senescence or other processes (21). A wide variety of studies have shown that leaf senescence is usually correlated with a decrease in CK activity levels in the leaves and have implicated roots as the major sources of CKs in mature leaves (30). These root-produced CKs are carried through the xylem into the leaves with the transpiration stream.In soybean, the developing pods, specifically the seeds, cause the plant to degenerate (monocarpic senescence) and die (14,15,19,20). Removal of the pods before, but not during, late podfill can prevent the dramatic yellowing and death of the plant (15, 19). How does CK fit into this correlative control picture? Early in reproductive development, the foliar CK-like activity (16) declines. This decrease is due neither to diversion of the flux from the leaves to the pods (22, 23) nor to an increase in the metabolism of CKs (Z and ZR and their metabolites), which is quite rapid anyhow in mature leaves (22,23,27). Thus, a decline in CK production by the roots could account for the decrease in foliar CK levels. In order to test further the connection between CKs and leaf senescence and to fill in a gap in our understanding of the role of CK in the control of senescence, this study examines the xylem sap levels of CK as a relative index of CK flux in plants allowed to develop fruit and senesce normally as well as in depodded plants. MATERIALS AND METHODS Pl...

No abstract