In general, the MST showed adequate criterion-related validity, test-retest and inter-rater reliabilities for the assessment of strength of the lower limb and trunk muscles in subjects with chronic stroke. For the majority of the assessed muscles, only one trial, after familiarization, provided adequate strength values.

The strength of the lower limb and trunk muscles was positively associated with comfortable and maximum gait speeds. The muscle strength of the non-paretic dorsiflexors and the left lateral trunk flexors might have a role to play in determining comfortable and maximum gait speeds of individuals with sub-acute stroke.

Most of the included studies had adequate methodological quality. The meta-analysis provided reference values for the isometric strength of 14 appendicular muscle groups of the dominant/non-dominant sides, measured with dynamometers/myometers, of men/women, of adults/elderly. These data may be used to interpret the results of the evaluations and establish appropriate treatment goals.

BackgroundMuscle strength is usually measured in individuals with stroke with Portable dynamometers (gold standard). However, no studies have investigated the reliability, the standard error of measurement (SEM) and the minimal detectable difference (MDD95%) of the dynamometry for the measurement of hand grip, pinch grip and trunk strength in subjects with subacute stroke.Objective1) To investigate the intra and inter-rater reliability, the SEM and the MDD95% of the portable dynamometers for the measurement of grip, pinch and trunk strength in subjects with subacute stroke, and 2) to verify whether the use of different number of trials (first trial and the average of the first two and three trials) affected the results.Method32 subjects with subacute stroke (time since stroke onset: 3.6 months, SD=0.66 months) were evaluated. Hand grip, 3 pinch grips (i.e. pulp-to-pulp/palmar/lateral) and 4 trunk muscles (i.e. flexors, extensors, lateral flexors and rotators) strength were bilaterally assessed (except trunk flexors/extensors) with portable dynamometry by two independent examiners over two sessions (1-2 weeks apart). One-way ANOVAs and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC2,k) were used for analysis (α=0.05). SEM and MDD95% were also calculated.ResultsFor all muscular groups and sources of outcome values, including one trial, after familiarization, similar results were found (0.01≤F≤0.08; 0.92≤p≤0.99) with significant and adequate values of intra-rater (0.64≤ICC≤0.99; 0.23≤95%CI≤0.99) and inter-rater (0.66≤ICC≤0.99; 0.25≤95%CI≤0.99) reliability. SEM and MDD95% were considered low (0.39≤EPM≤2.21 Kg; 0.96≤MMD95%≤6.12 Kg) for all outcome scores.ConclusionOnly one trial, following familiarization, demonstrated adequate intra-rater and inter-rater reliability of the portable dynamometers for the measurement of hand grip, pinch grip and trunk strength in subjects with subacute stroke.

OBJETIVO: Avaliar o desenvolvimento de crianças de 2 meses a 2 anos de idade por meio da Atenção Integrada às Doenças Prevalentes na Infância (AIDPI), no contexto do Programa de Educação pelo Trabalho em Saúde (PET-Saúde). MÉTODO: Estudo transversal realizado com 122 crianças, com idades entre 2 meses e 2 anos, da área de abrangência do Centro de Saúde São Bernardo (CSSB) - Belo Horizonte (MG), em 2009. Os dados relativos ao desenvolvimento foram obtidos através da aplicação de dois questionários: AIDPI e Caderneta de Saúde da Criança (CSC). Foram comparadas as classificações do desenvolvimento pela AIDPI e pela CSC, a associação entre atraso do desenvolvimento e as variáveis estudadas. RESULTADOS: As características com maior frequência na população estudada foram a baixa escolaridade das mães (62,1%), seguida de parentes com deficiência mental (71,3%) e problemas na gestação (71,3%). A AIDPI evidenciou que 61,5% da população estudada encontra-se normal com fator de risco, 16,4% normal sem fator de risco, 11,5% com possível atraso e 10,7% com provável atraso do desenvolvimento infantil. A concordância observada entre a classificação da AIDPI e da CSC foi de 0,34, coeficiente Kappa igual a - 0,12 (p = 0,98). Não houve associação estatisticamente significativa entre as variáveis analisadas (frequenta creches; convívio com problemas emocionais; escolaridade da mãe; idade gestacional; e peso ao nascer) e atraso possível/provável do desenvolvimento identificado pela AIDPI. CONCLUSÃO: O PET-Saúde, como proposta de integração da educação pelo trabalho, permitiu uma oportunidade de convivência e troca de experiências entre alunos e profissionais de diferentes áreas de atuação, trabalhando em um projeto comum.

No abstract

Introduction Clinical measurements of strength in stroke subjects are usually performed and portable dynamometers are one of the most employed instruments. Objective To verify the standardization procedures of the methods used to assess the strength of the trunk and upper limb muscles with portable dynamometers in stroke subjects, as well as to assess the psychometric properties which were already investigated. Materials and methods An extensive search was performed on the MEDLINE, SciELO, LILACS, and PEDro databases, by combining specific key words, followed by active manual searches by two independent researchers. Results and discussion Fifty-eight studies were included: three related to the trunk and 55 to the upper limb muscles, including handgrip and pinch strength assessments. The most investigated muscular groups were handgrip, elbow flexors/extensors, wrist extensors, and lateral pinch. Nine studies reported adequate reliability levels and the seated position was employed in the majority of the studies which assessed trunk, handgrip, and pinch strength, while the supine position was used for the other muscular groups. The number of trials most used was three, while the reported contractions and rest times were variable. Final considerations Most studies reported the positioning and/or the data collection protocols; however, there was no consensus on the standardization procedures. The only investigated psychometric property was reliability. Few studies evaluated the trunk muscles and other psychometric properties.

No abstract