No abstract

The combination of a hard subsurface layer and a ductile component core is advantageous for many applications. Steels are often heat treated to create such a hardened subsurface, which is both time‐ and energy‐consuming. It is of great advantage to create a hardened subsurface directly within the machining process, as the production line of most components includes such a process to produce the desired geometric dimensions and surface quality. To achieve a martensitic subsurface layer within the machining process, cryogenic, external turning using a metastable AISI304 austenitic steel is used herein. Herein eddy current testing and the analysis of higher harmonics are used for the detection of the ferromagnetic, martensitic phase in the parent austenite. A good correlation is found between the martensite content and the amplitude of the signals measured. Therefore, eddy current testing is considered as a suitable real‐time, nondestructive testing method, which forms the basis for the generation of a tailored, deformation‐induced martensitic subsurface layer during external turning.

In order to withstand high mechanical and tribological loads, it is important that the components not only have a high core ductility but also a hard surface. Typically, a suitable microstructure is created by heat treatment processes before the workpiece is machined. However, these processes are time and energy consuming and can lead to component distortion. It would therefore be of great advantage if no additional heat treatment process would be required to produce a hardened subsurface zone. Since turning is often already integrated as a machining process in production lines, it would be advantageous to create a hardened subsurface within this process. As there is no possibility to measure the hardness directly during the turning process, a soft sensor was developed to determine the properties of the subsurface directly during the machining process. Steels with metastable austenite are of particular interest in this context, as metastable austenite can be converted into martensite by deformation. The amount of martensite produced in the subsurface can be adjusted provided that suitable turning parameters can be found. For this purpose, a process parallel material removal simulation was used to determine the actual conditions governing the process. It was found that there is a correlation between the martensite content and the amplitude of the 3rd harmonic of eddy current testing. Therefore, an eddy current sensor accompanying the process can be used as a basis for controlling the turning process for tailored martensite volume content adjustment.

Cryogenic turning can be used to produce deformation-induced martensite in metastable austenitic steels. Martensite exhibits a higher hardness than austenite and increases the wear resistance of the workpiece. In order to reliably induce a desired martensite content in the subsurface zone during the turning process, a non-destructive, contactless and real-time testing method is necessary. Eddy current testing is an electromagnetic method that is non-destructive, non-contact and real-time capable. Furthermore, eddy current testing has been integrated into production processes many times. Eddy current testing can be used to detect the transformation of paramagnetic austenite to ferromagnetic α′-martensite based on the change in magnetic and electrical properties. Thus, the newly formed subsurface can be characterized and the manufacturing process can be monitored. The objective of this study was to understand the correlation of eddy current testing signals with newly formed α′-martensite in the subsurface of AISI 304 and to quantify the amount formed. The measurements were performed within a machining center. Several methods for reference measurement of martensite content are known in the literature. However, depending on the method used, large discrepancies may occur between the determined contents. Therefore, different analytical methods were used for reference measurements to determine the total martensite content in the subsurface. Metallographic sections, magnetic etching, Mössbauer spectroscopy, and X-ray diffraction with two different analytical methods were employed. Based on the correlation between the eddy current testing signals and the α′-martensite content in the subsurface, process control of the manufacturing process can be achieved in the future.

No abstract