Yoga has been shown to improve cancer survivors' quality of life, yet regular yoga practice is a challenge for those who are sedentary. We conducted a pilot randomized controlled study to assess feasibility and adherence of two types of yoga intervention among sedentary cancer survivors. Sedentary breast and ovarian cancer survivors were randomized to practice either restorative yoga (minimal physical exertion, Group R) or vigorous yoga (considerable physical exertion, Group V) in three 60-minute supervised sessions a week for 12 weeks, followed by 12 weeks of home practice. Accrual, adherence, and attendance rates were assessed. Of the 226 eligible patients, 175 (77%) declined to participate in the study, citing time commitment and travel as the most common barriers. Forty-two subjects consented to participate in the study. Of the 35 participants who began the intervention (20 in Group R and 15 in Group V), adherence rate (percentage remaining in the study at week 12) was 100% and 87%, respectively. Rate of adequate attendance (more than 66% of the scheduled supervised sessions) was 85% and 73%, respectively. Rate of completion of the home practice period was 85% and 77%, respectively. In this study, sedentary cancer survivors were able to adhere to a long-term, regular yoga regimen. The rate of adequate attendance was higher for restorative yoga. Future studies for sedentary patients should focus on reducing time commitment and travel requirements to improve recruitment, and on using restorative yoga as a more feasible intervention for this population.
Purpose: Many cancer survivors experience cancer-related cognitive impairment (CRCI). We conducted a randomized controlled pilot trial of 2 types of yoga practice and evaluated their effects on participants’ objective cognitive function. Methods: Sedentary breast or ovarian cancer survivors were randomized to practice either restorative yoga (with more meditative practice and minimal physical exertion) or vigorous yoga (with considerable physical exertion and minimal meditative practice) in 60-minute supervised sessions 3 times a week for 12 weeks, followed by 12 weeks of home practice. We used the NIH Toolbox Cognition Domain to evaluate participants at baseline, week 12, and week 24. Results: We enrolled 35 participants. For women in the restorative yoga group, overall cognitive function was statistically significantly improved at weeks 12 and 24 compared to baseline ( P = .03 and 0.004; Cohen’s D = 0.3 and 0.5). Fluid cognitive function also significantly improved at weeks 12 and 24 ( P = .02 and 0.0007; Cohen’s D = 0.3 and 0.6), whereas improvements in crystallized cognition were not significant. For women in the vigorous yoga group, significant improvement was only seen in tasks of crystallized cognition at week 24 ( P = .03; Cohen’s D = 0.5). Between-group comparisons showed that at week 24, women in the restorative yoga group had significantly higher scores on fluid cognition tasks. Conclusions: Patients who participated in yoga practice demonstrated improvement in objective cognitive function over time. Restorative yoga may be more effective in improving fluid cognitive function at week 24 when compared to vigorous yoga. These promising findings should be confirmed in definitive studies. Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov; NCT02305498 (Date Registered: December 2, 2014)
Purpose Dyspnea related to chronic pulmonary disorders is difficult to manage. In this single-arm study, we evaluated feasibility and potential efficacy of a self-care breath-training program to reduce dyspnea that persists despite standard treatments in patients with chronic lung disease. Methods Adult patients with a chronic pulmonary disorder and stable moderate dyspnea received one 30-minute training on specific breathing techniques, followed by audio-guided at-home practice 15 minutes twice daily for 6 weeks, supported with weekly telephone monitoring/coaching. Feasibility endpoints, Baseline and Transition Dyspnea Indexes (BDI/TDI), Six Minute Walk Test (6MWT), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), and oxygen saturation at rest and exercise were evaluated at baseline and week 6. Results Of 23 patients enrolled over 2 years, 19 completed the study. A majority (74%; 95% CI 49%, 91%) completed at least 75% of the home practice sessions. Significant objective improvements in physical performance, defined as distance walked, were observed after 6 weeks of intervention. On average, patients walked 59 more feet in the 6MWT (95% CI 18, 99; P=.007). In addition, 53% reported clinically significant (20%, defined a priori) subjective improvement in TDI, although the difference was not statistically significant (mean TDI, 0.7, 95% CI −0.8, 2.3; P=.3). No significant differences were seen in HADS or oxygen saturation. Conclusions A low-burden, low-cost, self-care breath training program improved distance walked by patients with chronic dyspnea after 6 weeks of home practice. Promising data suggest that a randomized trial of this breath training program is warranted.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.