Single-agent bevacizumab is efficacious in the management of recurrent or refractory pediatric LGG with radiographic and clinical responses similar to those reported for bevacizumab-based therapies.
MEK inhibitors are an emerging therapy with increasing use in mitogen-activated protein kinase-driven central nervous system (CNS) tumors. There is limited data regarding efficacy and toxicity in pediatric patients. We report our clinical experience with trametinib-based therapy for the treatment of 14 consecutive pediatric patients with recurrent low-grade glioma (N = 11) or highgrade CNS tumors (N = 3) with MAP kinase pathway mutations. Patients received trametinib as monotherapy (N = 9) or in combination (N = 5) with another antineoplastic agent. Nine patients (64%) were progression free during treatment. Five patients showed a partial response, while 4 had stable disease. Two patients (14%) progressed on therapy. All partial responses were in patients with low-grade tumors. The remaining 3 patients were not evaluable due to toxicity limiting duration of therapy. Two of 3 patients with lowgrade glioma with leptomeningeal dissemination showed radiographic treatment response. Five patients reported improved clinical symptoms while on trametinib. Adverse events on trametinib-based therapy included dermatologic, mouth sores, fever, gastrointestinal, infection, neutropenia, headache, and fatigue, and were more common in patients using combination therapy. Trametinib-based therapy demonstrated signals of efficacy in our single institutional cohort of pediatric patients with mitogen-activated protein kinasedriven CNS tumors. Our observations need to be confirmed in a clinical trial setting.
Visual field deficits can be a consequence of brain tumor location or treatment. The prevalence of unrecognized visual field deficits in children diagnosed with brain tumors is not known. All children at a single tertiary care pediatric children's hospital diagnosed with a primary brain tumor were tested for visual field deficits by a child neurologist and neuro-ophthalmologist over 16 months. Children with reproducible visual field deficits on two separate occasions were included in the analysis. Patients with optic glioma, craniopharyngioma, or previously known visual field deficits were excluded. Fourteen of 92 (15.2%) children (average 8.9 years, 8 girls) had undiagnosed visual field deficits. Average time between diagnosis of tumor and unrecognized visual field deficit was 3.7 years (range 0-13 years). Unrecognized visual field deficits were not associated with age (P = 0.27) or gender (P = 0.38). Visual field deficits were attributed to direct tumor infiltration (n = 8), postoperative complications (n = 5) and post-radiation edema (n = 1). Deficits included bitemporal hemianopsia (n = 2), homonymous hemianopsia (n = 9), quadrantanopsia (n = 2), and concentric visual field loss (n = 1.) Tumor location included temporal lobe (n = 9), parietal lobe (n = 2), posterior fossa (n = 2), hypothalamic-chiasmatic (n = 2) and multifocal areas (n = 4). Children with temporal lobe tumors were more likely to have unrecognized visual field deficits (P = 0.004). In all 14 patients, visual field deficits were determined by examination only and were not reported by either the patient or caregiver regardless of age. The prevalence of unrecognized visual field deficits in children with brain tumors can be surprisingly high. Serial neuro-ophthalmologic evaluation of children with brain tumors is often required to diagnose a visual field deficit since patient or caregiver reporting may be limited.
Successful use of immune checkpoint inhibitors in a variety of cancers has generated interest in using this approach in pediatric brain tumors. We performed a retrospective review of 10 consecutive children (6 boys, 4 girls; ages, 2 to 17 y), with recurrent or refractory pediatric brain tumors (5 high-grade glioma, 1 lowgrade glioma, pineoblastoma, medulloblastoma, ependymoma, and CNS embryonal tumor, NOS) treated at Rady Children's Hospital San Diego from 2015 to 2017 with the immune checkpoint inhibitor nivolumab (3 mg/kg every 2 wk). Eight of 10 patients received prior chemotherapy and 9 radiation therapy. Nine patients had radiographic disease progression (median, 2.5 doses). Median time to progression was 5.5 weeks (1.6 to 24 wk). Three patients (2 with high-grade glioma, 1 with CNS embryonal tumor NOS) showed a partial response to treatment at the primary tumor site and 2 of 3 had progression of metastatic disease. Grade 2 toxicities were observed without dose limiting side effects. Tumor mutation burden (TMB) was low to intermediate (median, 1.3; range, 0 to 6.3). Median survival for PD-L1 positive patients was 13.7 weeks versus 4.2 weeks for PD-L1 negative patients (ρ = 0.08) nivolumab was well tolerated in our series of pediatric recurrent brain tumors with some transient partial responses in patients with positive PD-L1 expression and higher TMB. Our findings suggest that the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors in pediatric brain tumor patients should be limited to those with elevated PD-L1 expression and TMB.
Medulloblastoma with extensive nodularity is a rare subtype of the most common malignant childhood brain tumor and has been associated with more favorable prognosis. The authors report the case of a 10-month-old girl with a posterior fossa tumor of excessive nodularity with decreased diffusivity on diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging sequences and robust grape-like postgadolinium contrast enhancing features. The unique neuroradiographic features were confirmed by histopathology and a diagnosis of medulloblastoma with extensive nodularity was made. This case highlights the importance of recognizing this unique medulloblastoma subtype preoperatively, as the more favorable outcome may preclude less aggressive medical management.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.