Quantitative FES-PET can predict response to hormonal therapy and may help guide treatment selection. Treatment selection using quantitative FES-PET in our patient series would have increased the rate of response from 23% to 34% overall, and from 29% to 46% in the subset of patients lacking HER2/neu overexpression. A multi-institutional collaborative trial would permit definitive assessment of the value of FES-PET for therapeutic decision making.
The PET compound 18 F-fluoroestradiol ( 18 F-FES) has been developed and tested as an agent for the imaging of estrogen receptor (ER) expression in vivo. 18 F-FES uptake has been shown to correlate with ER expression assayed in vitro by radioligand binding; however, immunohistochemistry (IHC) rather than radioligand binding is used most often to measure ER expression in clinical practice. We therefore compared 18 F-FES uptake with ER expression assayed in vitro by IHC with both qualitative and semiquantitative measures. Methods: Seventeen patients with primary or metastatic breast cancer were studied with dynamic 18 F-FES PET; cancer tissue samples, collected close to the time of imaging, were assayed for ER expression by IHC. For each tumor, partial-volume-corrected measures of 18 F-FES uptake were compared with ER expression measured by 3 different ER scoring methods: qualitative scoring (0-31), the Allred score (0-10), and a computerized IHC index. Results: There was excellent agreement (r 5 0.99) between observers using IHC as well as the different methods of measuring ER content (P , 0.001). ER-negative tumors had 18 F-FES partial-volumecorrected standardized uptake values of less than 1.0, whereas ER-positive tumors had values above 1.1. Correlation coefficients for the different measures of ER content and the different measures of 18 F-FES uptake ranged from 0.57 to 0.73, with the best correlation being between the computerized IHC index and 18 F-FES partial-volume-corrected standardized uptake values. Conclusion: Our results showed good agreement between 18 F-FES PET and ER expression measured by IHC. 18 F-FES imaging may be a useful tool for aiding in the assessment of ER status, especially in patients with multiple tumors or for tumors that are difficult to biopsy.
Purpose: Advanced head and neck cancer shows hypoxia that results in biological changes to make the tumor cells more aggressive and less responsive to treatment resulting in poor survival. [F-18] fluoromisonidazole (FMISO) positron emission tomography (PET) has the ability to noninvasively quantify regional hypoxia. We investigated the prognostic effect of pretherapy FMISO-PETon survival in head and neck cancer. Experimental Design: Seventy-three patients with head and neck cancer had pretherapy FMISO-PETand 53 also had fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PETunder a research protocol from April 1994 to April 2004. Results: Significant hypoxia was identified in 58 patients (79%). The mean FMISO tumor/ blood max (T/B max ) was 1.6 and the mean hypoxic volume (HV) was 40.2 mL. There were 28 deaths in the follow-up period. Mean FDG standard uptake value (SUV) max was 10.8.The median time for follow-up was 72 weeks. In a univariate analysis,T/B max (P = 0.002), HV (P = 0.04), and the presence of nodes (P = 0.01) were strong independent predictors. In a multivariate analysis, including FDG SUV max , no variable was predictive at P < 0.05. When FDG SUV max was removed from the model (resulting in n = 73 with 28 events), nodal status and T/B max (or HV) were both highly predictive (P = 0.02, 0.006 for node andT/B max , respectively; P = 0.02 and 0.001for node and HV, respectively).Conclusions: Pretherapy FMISO uptake shows a strong trend to be an independent prognostic measure in head and neck cancer.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.