Background:
Anemia is one of the most common manifestations in patients with cancer. Recently, multiple studies have shown a positive correlation between pretreatment anemia and tumor prognosis. Yet, the relationship between pretreatment anemia and the prognosis of soft tissue sarcomas (STS) is unclear.
Methods:
We searched the PubMed and EMBASE databases to identify relevant studies. Eligible studies were included according to the inclusion criteria to assess the relationship between pretreatment anemia and the prognosis of patients with STS. Prognostic significance was determined by studying hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
Results:
A total of 12 studies are included. If there is significant heterogeneity, a random-effects model is used. Pooled data indicated that pretreatment anemia is related to poor overall survival (HR = 2.13; 95%CI = 1.52–2.98), disease-specific survival (HR = 1.53; 95%CI = 1.20–1.96), and disease-free survival (HR = 1.55; 95%CI = 1.10–2.17). The results of the subgroup analysis also support this conclusion.
Conclusion:
Our results suggest that pretreatment anemia may be a prognostic biomarker for STS.
Objective: to investigate the effect of CT-assisted limited decompression in the management of single segment A3 lumbar burst fracture. Method: A retrospective study of 106 cases with a single-level Magerl type A3 lumbar burst fractures treated with short-segment posterior internal fixation and limited decompression from January 2015 to June 2019 was performed. Patients were divided into two groups: CT-assisted and non-CT-assisted. Perioperative factors, clinical outcomes, postoperative complications, imaging parameters and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) were evaluated. Results: There was no significant difference between the two groups in the kyphosis, anterior vertebral body height loss, posterior vertebral body height loss, operative time, and postoperative complications. The visual analogue score (VAS) and spinal canal encroachment in the CT-assisted group were lower than those in the non-CT-assisted group (P < 0.05). The Japanese Orthopaedic Association score (JOA), the simplified HRQoL scale and American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) Spinal Cord Injury Grade in the CT-assisted group were higher than those in the non-CT-assisted group (P < 0.05).Conclusion: CT-assisted limited decompression in the treatment of single-segment A3 lumbar burst fracture can achieve better fracture reduction and surgical results, and improve the long-term recovery of neurological function and quality of life of the patients.
Objective
To investigate the effect of CT-assisted limited decompression in managing single segment A3 lumbar burst fracture.
Method
A retrospective study (January 2015–June, 2019). One hundred six cases with single-level Magerl type A3 lumbar burst fractures treated with short-segment posterior internal fixation and limited decompression. Patients were divided into two groups: CT-assisted group and non-CT-assisted group. Perioperative factors, clinical outcomes, post-operative complications, imaging parameters, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) were evaluated.
Results
Kyphosis, loss of anterior and posterior vertebral body heights, operative time, and post-operative complications were not significantly different between the two groups. The visual analog score (VAS) and spinal canal encroachment in the CT-assisted group were lower compared with the non-CT-assisted group (p < 0.05). The Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, the simplified HRQoL scale, and the American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) Spinal Cord Injury Grade in the CT-assisted group were significantly higher compared with the non-CT-assisted group (p < 0.05).
Conclusion
CT-assisted limited decompression in the treatment of single-segment A3 lumbar burst fracture can achieve better fracture reduction and surgical results and improve the long-term recovery of the patients’ neurological function and quality of life.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.