Notary deed can be used as written evidence in court (civil and criminal). The notary then saves the deed as a million deed which is part of the notary protocol. The principle of prudence is needed by the Notary in saving the deed of minuta until the Notary retires. However, the reality is that the minutta deed is often scattered because of many things, such as changing positions, lack of employee responsibility, or coercing majors. In fact, UUJN does not regulate the completion of damaged or missing minuta. The purpose of this paper is to determine the position of the notary deed as evidence (civil and criminal) and analyze the need for the actualization of UUJN related to digitalization of the deed of minutes by the notary public. Research results and conclusions are; First, the position of the notary deed as evidence in criminal cases (only limited to the strength of evidence) and civil (strength of birth, formal, and material evidence). Second, the need for the actualization of UUJN related to digitalization of notary deed by a notary because it has economic and legal benefits.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.