Introduction. Breast conserving surgery (BCS) followed by radiation therapy (RT) has become the preferred alternative to mastectomy for patients with early stage breast cancer (BC). Randomized trials have confirmed equivalent locoregional control and overall survival for BCS and mastectomy. Extreme Oncoplasty (EO) extends the indications of BCS for patients who would otherwise require mastectomy, ensuring better aesthetic outcomes and oncological safety. Methods. BC patients with multifocal/multicentric (MF/MC) tumors, extensive DCIS, or large tumor >50mm underwent EO at our breast unit. Therapeutic reduction mammaplasty (TRM) with wise pattern preoperative markings and dual pedicle technique involving parenchymal rearrangement was used for oncoplastic reconstructions in majority of the cases followed by RT. Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) were assessed using the validated Breast-Q questionnaire. Results. Of the 39 patients in the study, 36 had unilateral and 3 had bilateral BC. Mean age was 47.2 years. Median tumor size was 75mm. 17 (43.6%) patients received NACT; none achieved a complete clinical response. 28 (71.8%) patients were administered to adjuvant chemotherapy. 33(84.6%) patients received RT to the breast with a median dose of 50Gy in 28 fractions and a boost dose of 10Gy in 5 fractions to the tumor bed. No major complications or local recurrences were observed. Excellent Breast-Q scores were observed in patients undergoing EO after 12 months of follow-up. Conclusion. EO followed by RT results in acceptable local-regional control, low rate of complications, and high patient satisfaction. In selected patients, EO could provide a safe alternative for breast conservation surgery instead of mastectomy.
Breast Cancer (BC) treatment leads to mutilation and destruction of breast shape with negative effects on body image and self-esteem.One of the main goals of reconstructive and oncoplastic breast surgery is to satisfy patients and improve their quality of life (QoL).Therefore, it is important to assess the patient experience post-surgery by means of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) that focus on the patient's perception of the surgery and surgical care, as well as psychosocial well-being and physical functioning. The objective of the current study was to identify predictors of patient satisfaction such as breast appearance including implant type in a selective sample of women who underwent breast reconstruction surgery using implants. Participants in this prospective study were women, (age 26-75 years) that were newly diagnosed with breast carcinoma. All consecutive patients who underwent breast reconstruction between January 2013 and October 2014 were asked to complete the BREAST-Q questionnaire 1 year after surgery. 120 patients underwent unilateral breast reconstruction using implant. While 38 patients underwent reconstruction with opposite breast reduction symmertization, 27 patients underwent therapeutic mammoplasty. The response rate for BREAST-Q questionnaire completion was 98 % with 147 out of 150 study participants completed the questionnaire. From the data collected from 147 patients, the responses could be distributed into 4 distinct groups based on the reconstruction outcomes namely "very much satisfied" (93 %) or "definitely and mostly satisfied" (94 %) or "satisfied" with the outcome (88 %) or "definitely agree on having reconstruction rather than the alternative of having no breast "(91 %).The results showed significant improvement in all four areas that were evaluated after surgery namely satisfaction with the appearance of the breasts, psychosocial, sexual and physical well-being. While the reconstruction surgery had an overall positive impact on quality of life it was observed that in patients that did not undergo breast reconstruction psychological issues related to sexuality were observed. Many newly diagnosed BC patients do not opt for these new surgical procedures due to psychological trauma or lack of information. Based on these observations, we propose that Breast Cancer Management protocols should also include additional counselling support for the newly diagnosed BC patients on the option of breast reconstruction along with conventional medical treatment counselling by the Oncosurgeon.
The report evaluates the effect of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic on breast cancer treatment and management at a single-surgeon cancer care unit in one of the hotspots of COVID-19 in India. In response to the pandemic, the adjustments were made in the clinical practice to accommodate social distancing. Patient consultations were done over phone call or in-clinic visit with prior appointment to reduce the risk of exposure to COVID-19. Total number of patients that were treated at the clinic and the essential surgeries performed during the pandemic phases are summarized in the report. The methodology adopted here for care and management of the cancer patients can serve as a guiding principle for cancer care units in the country.
Purpose: Breast cancer is the most common cancer in Indian women with a high incidence of triple negative breast cancer (TNBC). The high TNBC prevalence (>25%) in India remains a challenge in clinical management. Association of germline BRCA1/2 mutations in TNBCs is well-established as a predisposing factor for hereditary breast cancer risk. These studies are however predominantly representative of western population. Therefore, we investigated germline profiles of multi-institutional cohort of TNBC patients in India Methods: Using a multi-gene NGS (next-generation sequencing) panel of 26 ACMG recommended genes associated with inherited cancers. Results: In our study cohort of 193 TNBC patients, we identified 57 pathogenic mutations of which BRCA1 (41/57, 71.93%) and BRCA2 (8/57, 14.03%) were most commonly mutated. Additionally, 8 pathogenic mutations were identified in non-BRCA cancer pre-disposing genes associated with the HR pathway. 10 novel mutations were identified in 3 genes namely BRCA1, BRCA2 and PALB2. Comparison of allele-frequency with the global databases like TCGA (The Cancer Genome Atlas), gnomAD and Genome Asia 100K indicated that the novel mutations were unique. Furthermore, we identified 48 variants of uncertain significance (VUS) (24.9%). Conclusions: Our study confirms the major proportion of mutations in BRCA1/2 genes in TNBCs in India. Interestingly, a higher proportion of VUS were found in the non-BRCA genes compared to BRCA1/2 emphasizing the need for functional studies of the non-BRCA genes. Additionally, large scale studies are also warranted to elucidate the landscape of germline mutations relevant to the Indian population and their probable clinical implications.
Breast cancer is the most common cancer in Indian women with a high incidence of triple negative breast cancer (TNBC), an aggressive subtype of breast cancer associated with poor prognosis. The high TNBC prevalence (>25%) in India as compared to the western population (10-15%) remains to be a challenge in clinical management. The association of germline BRCA1/2 mutations in TNBCs is well-established as a predisposing factor for hereditary breast cancer risk. However, these studies are predominantly from germline profiling of TNBCs representative of western population. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the germline profiles of breast cancer patients in India using a multi-institutional TNBC cohort based on ACMG consensus multi-gene NGS panel. Of 193 TNBC patients, we identified 57 pathogenic mutations (diagnostic yield = 29.53%) from various genes of which BRCA1 (41/57, 71.93%) and BRCA2 (8/57, 14.03%) were most commonly mutated. We observed a high prevalence of BRCA1 mutations (41/193, 21.24%) and BRCA2 mutations (8/193, 4.14%) in our cohort as compared to published literature. Additionally, 8 pathogenic mutations were also reported in non-BRCA cancer pre-disposing genes associated with the HR pathway like ATM, CHEK2, PALB2. 10 novel mutations were identified in 3 genes namely BRCA1, BRCA2 and PALB2. The most common type of mutations was found to be frame-shift which may cause protein truncation and loss of function. Furthermore, we identified 48 variants of unknown significance (24.9%) of which about 7% were in the BRCA1/2 genes. Data mining from global databases like TCGA, Genome Asia indicated that the novel mutations were unique to the Indian population compared to the germline profiles of different ethnicities. Our study confirms the major contribution of BRCA1/2 genes in TNBCs as reported in the literature. A high percentage of the women were found to be associated with young age onset which may be attributed to BRCA mutations. We have also assessed the association of clinicopathological parameters such as tumor grade, stage, recurrence to the germline mutational status. Our analysis shows significant association of germline mutational status with family history thus underlin the importance of multi-gene panel testing as recommended by NCCN guidelines. Moreover, our results also emphasize the need for designing/implementing guidelines specific to Indian population. In summary our results indicate that Indian TNBCs have a high prevalence of BRCA1/2 mutations. Large scale studies in future are warranted to validate these preliminary findings. Citation Format: Chaitanyanand Koppiker, Ashwini Bapat, Siddharth Gahlaut, Naveen Luke, Jisha John, Rupa Mishra, Aishwarya Konnur, Namrata Namewar, Ruhi Reddy, Shaheen Shaikh, Rituja Banale, Smeeta Nare, Laleh Busheri, Asha Reddy, Ashraf Mannan, Sabarinathan Radhakrishnan, Selvi Radhakrishna, Santosh Dixit. Germline mutational profiling of TNBCs in an Indian cohort [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr LB561.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.