In the sentence beginning 'The meQTL are enriched for functionally relevant characteristics', please provide a de inition for Hi-C.2. In the author list, there are two authors with the name Panos Deloukas with different af iliations. Please con irm whether this is the same individual and whether the two authors can be merged. 3.Please check your article carefully, coordinate with any co-authors and enter all inal edits clearly in the eproof, remembering to save frequently. Once corrections are submitted, we cannot routinely make further changes to the article. 4. Note that the eproof should be amended in only one browser window at any one time; otherwise changes will be overwritten. 5. Author surnames have been highlighted. Please check these carefully and adjust if the irst name or surname is marked up incorrectly. Note that changes here will affect indexing of your article in public repositories such as PubMed. Also, carefully check the spelling and numbering of all author names and af iliations, and the corresponding email address(es).6. You cannot alter accepted Supplementary Information iles except for critical changes to scienti ic content. If you do resupply any iles, please also provide a brief (but complete) list of changes. If these are not considered scienti ic changes, any altered Supplementary iles will not be used, only the originally accepted version will be published. If applicable, please ensure that any accession codes and datasets whoseDOIs or other identi iers are mentioned in the paper are scheduled for public release as soon as possible, we recommend within a few days of submitting your proof, and update the database record with publication details from this article once available. 8. Your paper has been copy edited. Please review every sentence to ensure that it conveys your intended meaning; if changes are required, please provide further clari ication rather than reverting to the original text. Please note that formatting (including hyphenation, Latin words,and any reference citations that might be mistaken for exponents) has been made consistent with our house style. 9. Please con irm or correct the city name inserted in af iliations 5, 10, 12, 13, 21, 22, 39 and 44. 10. In the sentence beginning 'Our meQTL replicate in data generated by the Illumina', please provide a de inition for EPIC and con irm whether the de inition provided for MeDIP-seq is correct. 11. In the legend for Fig. 2g, please provide a de inition for SAT. 12. In the sentence beginning 'We used summary data-based Mendelian', please con irm whether it is correct to say '0.05 ÷ n tests'. 13. In the sentence beginning 'We then tested the 4,811 eQTL genes', please provide a de inition for coloc PP4. 14. Please note, we reserve ‘signi icant' and its derivatives for statistical signi icance. This has been reworded where this was not the intended meaning (for example to important, notable, ...

Alzheimer Disease (AD) is a progressive neurological disorder characterized by the deposition of amyloid beta (Aβ), predominantly the Aβ1–42 form, in the brain. Mitochondrial dysfunction and impaired energy metabolism are important components of AD pathogenesis. However, the causal and temporal relationships between them and AD pathology remain unclear. Using a novel C. elegans AD strain with constitutive neuronal Aβ1–42 expression that displays neuromuscular defects and age-dependent behavioural dysfunction reminiscent of AD, we have shown that mitochondrial bioenergetic deficit is an early event in AD pathogenesis, preceding dysfunction of mitochondrial electron transfer chain (ETC) complexes and the onset of global metabolic failure. These results are consistent with an emerging view that AD may be a metabolic neurodegenerative disease, and also confirm that Aβ-driven metabolic and mitochondrial effects can be reproduced in organisms separated by large evolutionary distances.

Deletion mutations within mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) have been implicated in degenerative and aging related conditions, such as sarcopenia and neuro-degeneration. While the precise molecular mechanism of deletion formation in mtDNA is still not completely understood, genome motifs such as direct repeat (DR) and stem-loop (SL) have been observed in the neighborhood of deletion breakpoints and thus have been postulated to take part in mutagenesis. In this study, we have analyzed the mitochondrial genomes from four different mammals: human, rhesus monkey, mouse and rat, and compared them to randomly generated sequences to further elucidate the role of direct repeat and stem-loop motifs in aging associated mtDNA deletions. Our analysis revealed that in the four species, DR and SL structures are abundant and that their distributions in mtDNA are not statistically different from randomized sequences. However, the average distance between the reported age associated mtDNA breakpoints and their respective nearest DR motifs is significantly shorter than what is expected of random chance in human (p<10−4) and rhesus monkey (p = 0.0034), but not in mouse (p = 0.0719) and rat (p = 0.0437), indicating the existence of species specific difference in the relationship between DR motifs and deletion breakpoints. In addition, the frequencies of large DRs (>10 bp) tend to decrease with increasing lifespan among the four mammals studied here, further suggesting an evolutionary selection against stable mtDNA misalignments associated with long DRs in long-living animals. In contrast to the results on DR, the probability of finding SL motifs near a deletion breakpoint does not differ from random in any of the four mtDNA sequences considered. Taken together, the findings in this study give support for the importance of stable mtDNA misalignments, aided by long DRs, as a major mechanism of deletion formation in long-living, but not in short-living mammals.