The highest prevalence of depressive disorders was found in the first trimester, the lowest in mid-pregnancy. Several determinants (unwanted and unplanned pregnancy, high neuroticism) were independent predictors of antenatal depressive disorders throughout whole pregnancy, while other determinants (low education, previous history of depression, the occurrence of psychosocial stressors at the end of pregnancy) were trimester specific.

This study aimed to evaluate how precise the Edinburgh Depression Scale (EDS) is in screening for major depressive disorder (MDD) during different periods of pregnancy. A random sample of 230 pregnant women was interviewed in the first, second, and third trimesters of pregnancy using the EDS and not-patient version of the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R (SCID-NP). We evaluated test-retest reliability of the EDS; area under the ROC curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value (PPV) of the EDS against the SCID-NP diagnoses in the first, second, and third trimesters of pregnancy. Test-retest reliability of the EDS was 0.81 (p < 0.001). An optimal cutoff score of the EDS for screening current SCID-NP diagnosis of MDD was 12 and higher in the first trimester of pregnancy (AUC 0.94, sensitivity 92%, specificity 95%, and PPV 52%) and 11 and higher in the second and third trimesters of pregnancy (AUC 0.96 and 0.90, respectively; sensitivity 100% and 88%, respectively; specificity 92% and 92%, respectively; PPV 25% and 29%, respectively). The EPDS is a reliable instrument for repeated evaluations of depressive symptoms during pregnancy. It has a good sensitivity and specificity for detecting antenatal MDD with optimal cutoff of 11/12 or higher.

ObjectivesA previous individual participant data meta‐analysis (IPDMA) identified differences in major depression classification rates between different diagnostic interviews, controlling for depressive symptoms on the basis of the Patient Health Questionnaire‐9. We aimed to determine whether similar results would be seen in a different population, using studies that administered the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) in pregnancy or postpartum.MethodsData accrued for an EPDS diagnostic accuracy IPDMA were analysed. Binomial generalised linear mixed models were fit to compare depression classification odds for the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI), Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI), and Structured Clinical Interview for DSM (SCID), controlling for EPDS scores and participant characteristics.ResultsAmong fully structured interviews, the MINI (15 studies, 2,532 participants, 342 major depression cases) classified depression more often than the CIDI (3 studies, 2,948 participants, 194 major depression cases; adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 3.72, 95% confidence interval [CI] [1.21, 11.43]). Compared with the semistructured SCID (28 studies, 7,403 participants, 1,027 major depression cases), odds with the CIDI (interaction aOR = 0.88, 95% CI [0.85, 0.92]) and MINI (interaction aOR = 0.95, 95% CI [0.92, 0.99]) increased less as EPDS scores increased.ConclusionDifferent interviews may not classify major depression equivalently.

This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

These findings show an association between thyroid dysfunction and depression in late pregnancy. Because gestational depression might interfere with pregnancy outcome, evaluation of thyroid function during gestation is warranted.