Baseline QOL as assessed by self-rating questionnaires is influenced by the age of onset of the GH deficiency, adult onset patients expressing the greater distress. Improvements in QOL scores are influenced by both baseline score and to a lesser extent the age of onset of GHD, the greater improvement being observed in childhood onset patients. The degree of improvement was observed to be independent of gender, pathology and number of pituitary hormone deficits. In a cohort selected by subjectively impaired QOL, we have demonstrated childhood onset GHD patients perceive themselves to have less impairment of QOL pretreatment. In contrast to previous data in unselected cohorts, however, we have shown that those childhood onset GHD patients in whom QOL is significantly reduced, show a capacity for improvement that is equal to, if not greater, than that seen in adult onset-GHD patients.

Low-dose individualized GH replacement aimed at normalization of the serum IGF-I is associated with significant improvements in TC, LDLC, TGs and the TC/HDLC ratio. The greatest improvements are observed in patients with the most adverse lipid profiles at baseline. Improvements are independent of changes in the IGF-I SDS and GH dose.

We studied 50 (27 women and 23 men) GH-deficient (GHD) cancer survivors and 47 (24 women and 23 men) GHD patients with pituitary pathologies. All GHD patients were considered for GH replacement on the basis of subjectively poor quality of life (QOL). Primary outcome measures were scores of QOL instruments psychological general well-being schedule (PGWB) and assessment of GH deficiency in adults (AGHDA) at baseline and early (6-13 months) and long-term (24-77 months) treatment follow-up. Of secondary interest were six PGWB domains. Linear mixed effect regression was used to model each QOL outcome. The groups differed with respect to three covariates: age, gender, and body mass index. These variables were included in all fitted models. Baseline scores for PGWB and AGHDA were not different between groups. Ranking of PGWB domains were similar between groups at baseline (lowest domain, vitality). The pattern of change in mean scores for all outcome measures from baseline did not differ between groups (P = 0.86). All QOL variables improved significantly with treatment [estimated mean change +/- se: PGWB, 16.2 +/- 1.7; AGHDA, -6.2 +/- 0.6; PGWB domains (transformed percentage scales): anxiety, 12.4 +/- 1.7; depression, 14.1 +/- 2.1; health, 12.4 +/- 1.7; self-control, 11.3 +/- 2.0; well-being, 15.2 +/- 1.7; vitality, 22.5 +/- 2.0 (vitality, greatest change)]. There was no evidence of group difference in early follow-up or long-term follow-up means for any outcome variable. The QOL in adult GHD cancer survivors was comparable to that in GHD adults with pituitary pathologies and improved with GH replacement in a similar manner. We conclude that QOL impairment in adult GHD cancer survivors appears mainly related to GHD rather than cancer diagnosis and treatment.

The most appropriate way to manage GH replacement in the transition period to adulthood in children treated with GH for GH deficiency (GHD) is controversial. The Growth Hormone Research Society suggests that the retesting of GH status at final height (FH) is unnecessary in the presence of severe organic GHD, and cranial irradiation falls into this etiological category. This recommendation has never been validated. To investigate whether patients diagnosed in childhood as GHD secondary to irradiation require retesting after FH, GH status has been reassessed in a large cohort of irradiated children treated with GH during childhood. Seventy-three children underwent biochemical assessment of GH status after irradiation and again at FH after GH therapy had been discontinued; 66 and 67 of the 73 patients underwent two provocative tests at the two time points, respectively. The characteristics of the cohort include a median age at irradiation of 5 yr (range, 1-11 yr), a median biological effective dose (BED) of irradiation to the hypothalamic pituitary axis of 54 Gy (range, 23-82 Gy), and a median time of GH status reassessment after FH of 0.4 yr (range, 0-8.4 yr). During childhood, patients with all degrees of GHD (peak GH responses to provocative test < 6.7 ng/ml) are treated, whereas in adulthood, only patients with severe GHD (peak GH responses to provocative test < 3 ng/ml) are considered for GH replacement. GH status has been grouped as follows: group 1, peak GH less than 3 ng/ml to both tests (severe GHD); group 2, one test with a peak GH less than 3 ng/ml and the other test with a peak of 3 ng/ml or greater; group 3, peak GH of 3-6.7 ng/ml to both tests; group 4, one test with a peak GH of 3-6.7 ng/ml and the other test with a peak of more than 6.7 ng/ml; and group 5, peak GH more than 6.7 ng/ml to both tests (normal GH status). In childhood, the number of patients in groups 1, 2, 3, and 4 were 33, 22, 17, and one, respectively. At retesting, severe GHD was diagnosed in 21 (64%) of 33 patients who were diagnosed in childhood with severe GHD (group 1) and 17 (44%) of 39 patients who were diagnosed in childhood with moderate GHD (groups 2 and 3). In total, 35 (48%) of 73 patients in the whole cohort and 12 (36%) of 33 patients with severe GHD in childhood did not fulfill the severe GHD biochemical criteria for GH replacement in adulthood. Using multiple linear regression, GH status at retesting is predicted by BED, age at irradiation, and use of chemotherapy. In conclusion, the diagnosis of severe GHD in childhood secondary to irradiation should not be taken as irrefutable evidence of permanent severe organic GHD, and our recommendation is that retesting of GH status at FH should be mandatory.

hGH-Biosphere(R) is a well-tolerated SR GH preparation with superior efficacy in achieving target IGF-I levels without causing supraphysiological GH concentrations. Our data suggest the suitability of this preparation for longer-term trials in adults with injection frequencies of no more than once every 2-3 weeks.