Introduction. In recent years, agricultural production in Russia has increased at the expense of farms and personal subsidiary plots; farmers use chemical protection means - pesticides to protect crops. Farmers and users of private household plots are considered the leading risk group most exposed to pesticides during their application, transportation, and loading. At the same time, farmers and users do not have special training in the safe handling of pesticides. They do not undergo periodic medical examinations, which increases the risk of exposure to pesticides on their health. Purpose of work. Study of exposures of pesticides in the air of the working area and on the skin of workers when they use pesticides in private farms, farms on-field, and high garden crops; justification of the requirements for the safe use of pesticides in private farms and farms. Material and methods. The established exposure levels of pesticides in the air and on the skin were compared with hygiene standards calculated or experimentally set: MPC / OBUV (mg / m3) in the atmosphere of the working area and MPC/ODU (mg/cm2) of skin contamination. The exposure level risk was determined by the KBsumm. The risk of exposure to pesticides for the operator/farmer/user based on the absorbed dose, determined by the value of the safety factor - KBp, and exposure - Kbsumm, is considered acceptable when the value of KBsumm and KBp < 1. Results. The authors presented generalized results of the analysis of the risk of exposure to pesticides in terms of both exposure (KBsumm) and absorbed dose (KBp) in natural conditions when using 20 drugs on field and garden crops in private household plots and farms. The absorbed dose for farmers, calculated taking into account the work for 6 hours, when compared with ADI, in some cases, exceeded the permissible values. The risk of using two preparations in suspension concentrates and one preparation in the form of a nanoemulsion concentrate in terms of the absorbed dose during knapsack spraying of field crops in farms was higher than the acceptable one. Conclusion. The hygienic assessment of the risk of using pesticides of different hazard classes for all land application methods into the environment convinces us the actual hygienic situation to be determined mainly by the state of the equipment used, compliance with hygiene regulations. The degree of professional skills of operators, as well as the culture of pesticide use, are significant. In the future, the risk, especially in terms of the absorbed dose, must be calculated for users of private household plots and farmworkers, taking into account the differences in cultivated areas’ volumes.
We analyzed the results of hygienic researches in the application of 30 preparations with different active substances, consumption rates and composition of preparative forms by the air method. We found that in samples of atmospheric air at a distance of 2000 m from the boundaries of the cultivated area, the concentration of pesticides did not exceed the limit of quantitative determination, as well as in sedimentation samples (demolitions outside the cultivated area), at the border of the sanitary gap regulated by SanPiN 1.2.2584–10. Absence of active substances or a small amount of them in the air at the border of the sanitary gap (2 km) and demolitions (1 km and 2 km) with the use of pesticides by the aviation method confirms their safety for the population and the environment while observing technological and hygienic regulations.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.