DNase I footprinting has been used to probe the sequence selectivity of binding of a series of intercalating amsacrine-4-carboxamides and a related 9-aminoacridine-4-carboxamide to three DNA restriction fragments. These ligands have good experimental antileukemic activity, and for those members of the series that gave evaluable footprints, our principal finding is that they bind preferentially to GC-rich regions in agreement with the conclusion of equilibrium and kinetic measurements. The highest affinity sites generally occur in clusters of GC base pairs with runs of AT pairs being excluded from binding. It is important to appreciate that the 9-aminoacridine- and amsacrine-4-carboxamides exhibit a very high degree of selectivity for GC sites which, to our knowledge, has not been previously matched by acridine derivatives in footprinting experiments. The principal determinant of specificity appears to be the 4-carboxamide group itself since neither variations in the terminal funtionality of the 4-carboxamide sidechain nor the presence of the 9-anilino substituent modifies sequence preferences. The molecular origins of selectivity may be discerned in terms of potential hydrogen bonding interactions between the 4-carboxamide moiety and carbonyl oxygen and amino groups of GC base pairs in the DNA minor groove at CG dinucleotide sites. The related therapeutic agent amsacrine failed to inhibit cleavage by DNase I, so no conclusion can be drawn concerning its binding selectivity, save to note that amsacrine does not possess the 4-carboxamide group which appears to be the crucial determinant of GC specificity. Whether selectivity for binding to GC-rich sequences is an important element in the antitumor activity of both the 9-aminoacridine- and amsacrine-4-carboxamides remains to be determined.
The binding of platinum (II)-terpyridine complexes to DNA was studied by using equilibrium dialysis.Optical absorption methods were used to measure the ability of the ligands to aggregate in aqueous buffer. requirement for a single G C base-pair at the highest-affinity site. However, in the binuclear ligands chromophore specificity is severely compromised. Similar experiments indicate that 9-aminoacridine and selected methylene-linked diacridines show no significant sequence selectivity.
A series of DNA-targeted aniline mustards have been prepared, and their chemical reactivity and in vitro and in vivo cytotoxicity have been evaluated and compared with that of the corresponding simple aniline mustards. The alkylating groups were anchored to the DNA-intercalating 9-aminoacridine chromophore by an alkyl chain of fixed length attached at the mustard 4-position through a link group X, while the corresponding simple mustards possessed an electronically identical small group at this position. The link group was varied to provide a series of compounds of similar geometry but widely differing mustard reactivity. Variation in biological activity should then largely be a consequence of this varying reactivity. Rates of mustard hydrolysis in the two series related only to the electronic properties of the link group, with attachment of the intercalating chromophore having no effect. The cytotoxicities of the simple mustards correlated well with group electronic properties (with a 200-300-fold range in IC50S). The corresponding DNA-targeted mustards were much more potent (up to 100-fold), but their IC50 values varied much less with linker group electronic properties. Most of the DNA-targeted mustards showed in vivo antitumor activity, being both more active and more dose-potent than either the corresponding untargeted mustards and chlorambucil. These results show that targeting alkylating agents to DNA by attachment to DNA-affinic units may be a useful strategy.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.