Light is necessary for asexual sporulation in Aspergillus nidulans but will elicit conidiation only if irradiation occurs during a critical period of development. We show that conidiation is induced by red light and suppressed by an immediate shift to far red light. Conidiation-specific gene functions switch from light-independent to light-dependent activities coincident with the expression of brlA, a regulator of conidiophore development. We also show that light dependence is abolished by a mutation in the velvet gene, which allows conidiation to occur in the absence of light. We propose that the initiation of late gene expression is regulated by velvet and controlled by a red light photoreceptor, whose properties are reminiscent of phytochrome-mediated responses observed in higher plants.

In contrast to many other cases in microbial development, Aspergillus nidulans conidiophore production initiates primarily as a programmed part of the life cycle rather than as a response to nutrient deprivation.Mutations in the acoD locus result in "fluffy" colonies that appear to grow faster than the wild type and proliferate as undifferentiated masses of vegetative cells. We show that unlike wild-type strains, acoD deletion mutants are unable to make conidiophores under optimal growth conditions but can be induced to conidiate when growth is nutritionally limited. The requirement for acoD in conidiophore development occurs prior to activation of brL4, a primary regulator of development. The acoD transcript is present both in vegetative hyphae prior to developmental induction and in developing cultures. However, the effects of acoD mutations are detectable only after developmental induction. We propose that acoD activity is primarily controlled at the posttranscriptional level and that it is required to direct developmentally specific changes that bring about growth inhibition and activation of brUA expression to result in conidiophore development.

No abstract

Mutants of AspergiUlus nidulans defective in conidiation (asexual sporulation) can be classified according to whether they are blocked before or after induction of conidiation. Mutants blocked before induction (preinduction mutants) appear to be unable to respond to the inducing stimulus and thus are defective in one of the earliest events in the sporulation process. Three preinduction mutants have been isolated and characterized. Each was found to exhibit the same pleiotropic phenotype: they also were defective in sexual sporulation and secreted a set of phenolic metabolites at a level much higher than did wild type or mutants blocked at later stages of conidiation. One of the metabolites has been identified as the antibiotic diorcinal (3,3'-dihydroxy-5,5'dimethyldiphenyl ether) which is known to be involved in the synthesis of certain farnesyl phenols of unknown function. These results suggest that preinduction mutants are blocked in a phenolic metabolic pathway, one or more product of which participates in the initiation of sporulation.

Three mutants of Aspergillus nidulans, selected to have a block at an early stage of conidiation (asexual sporulation), exhibit similar pleiotropic phenotypes. Each of these mutants, termed preinduction mutants, also are blocked in sexual sporulation and secrete a set of phenolic metabolites at level much higher than wild type or mutants blocked at later stages of conidiation. Backcrosses of these mutants to wild type showed that the three phenotypes always cosegregated. Diploids containing the mutant alleles in all pairwise combinations were normal for all phenotypes, showing that the three mutations are nonallelic. This conclusion was confirmed by the finding that the mutations map at three unlinked or distantly linked loci. Ten revertants of the two least leaky preinduction mutants, selected for ability to conidiate, were found in each case to arise by a second-site suppressor mutation. All of the revertants still showed accumulation of some of the phenolic metabolites but differed from each other in certain components. Three of the revertants retained the block in sexual sporulation. In these cases the suppressor has thus uncoupled the block in asexual sporulation from the block in sexual sporulation. These results are understandable in terms of a model in which preinduction mutations and their suppressors affect steps in a single metabolic pathway whose intermediates include an effector specific for asexual sporulation and a second effector specific for sexual sporulation.