Abstract:Models are widely used to simulate hydrological response and the generation and transport of constituents such as salt, phosphorus, and nitrogen from catchments to streams. Several models use a spatial representation with catchments divided into subcatchments. Variations in land use and other characteristics within subcatchments are represented by spatially lumped hydrologic response units (HRUs) or functional units instead of using fully distributed models. This approach disregards any spatial interaction between HRUs, including their connectivity to each other and to the stream and the influence of these interactions on water and constituent export. A spatially explicit hydrological model (Thales) was used to simulate a variety of theoretical catchments with soils dominated by combinations of infiltration excess, saturation excess, and subsurface stormflow processes and different soil constituent concentrations that were spatially interacting (i.e. located along a hillslope sequence). The modelling results show that the response of both runoff and concentration is sensitive to varying spatial arrangements due to interactions of runoff, infiltration, and chemical processes between the different soil types in many but not all situations. Results highlight the importance of considering connectivity of pathways when modelling hydrological response and constituents export. This is achieved by comparing pairs of simulations and the corresponding differences in the exported loads.
Riparian zones are considered to be a good way of reducing water flow and sediment losses to streams, but is planting trees further away from the stream bank just as effective? Here we have used a combination of analytical models and numerical models to estimate the likely effects of the positioning of trees in a catchment on the hydrologic response. An analytical model of a planar slope was used extended in a piecewise manner to determine the effect of varying roughness of a section of the slope on runoff depth, velocity and quantity. This was compared to a numerical solution of the full flow equation on a slope. Results show that the analytical solution predicts a larger runoff depth than the numerical solution, which is to be expected as it ignores some of the terms in the full solution. The numerical model shows the same abrupt transient in head (height of water on soil surface) at a change in roughness assumed in the analytical model.A uniform planar slope of length of 100 m was split into 4 equal quarters and the effect of slope, runoff rate and roughness on the discharge rate at each quarter and at the bottom of the slope was investigated with the analytical model. This showed that the discharge rate would change in quarter with different roughness but relax back to the original discharge rate in the next quarter of the slope, when the changed occurred in the upper 3 quarters of the slope. Only when the roughness change occurred in the last quarter of the slope was the discharge rate affected at the bottom of the slope. Slope angle was found to have the least effect on changing discharge rate at the bottom of the slope. The numerical solution though, could not produce a stable solution when the length of the slope length, runoff rate, roughness and slope angle were large, while the analytical solution was able to produce results in all cases considered.Neither the analytical or numerical solutions of flow down the sloping surface included the effect of prior soil conditions on the amount of runoff generated. In order to investigate soil and climate effects on runoff the problem was also solved using the THALES catchment model. Results with the catchment model THALES generally supported the analytical model but also allow the climate and soils (infiltration and evapotranspiration) when the vegetation was changed to be assessed. Three contrasting sites were chosen; Melbourne, Brisbane and Perth, along with three soil materials (clay(C), clay loam (CL) and sandy loam (SL)). The soil materials were used to created soil profiles with four 0.3 m layers (total depth 1.2 m); soil#1 SL for all four layers; soil#2 SL for top layer and CL for lower 3 layers; and soil#3 C for all 4 layers. Two slopes; A1-10° and A2-30° were used, and combined with three soils and 3 sites resulted in 18 scenarios. The results showed that the planting of trees at different positions of the slope had an effect for sandy loam soils and moderate slopes in a winter dominated rainfall climate like Melbourne. However, for a summer dominated r...
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.