No abstract

We analyzed the management of regional lymph nodes in 110 patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the penis treated at the Netherlands Cancer Institute between 1956 and 1989 with curative intent. Of 66 patients who presented with unsuspected nodes 57 were placed on a surveillance program, while lymph node dissection was performed in 5 (with adjuvant external radiation therapy in 1) and 4 were treated with external radiation therapy only. The management of 40 patients with clinically suspected nodes included surveillance in 5, lymph node dissection in 27 (with adjuvant radiotherapy in 11), biopsy in 4 and external radiation therapy in 4. Postoperative radiotherapy had been given if more than 2 nodes were involved or when extracapsular growth was observed. Overall, 25 patients had a regional recurrence, 5 of whom could be cured subsequently. All regional recurrences developed within 2 years after primary treatment. Analysis showed 100% survival in histologically proved node negative patients (stage pN0). The success of lymph node dissection was related to the extent of the metastatic spread and to the number of involved nodes. Patients with 1 positive node and unilateral inguinal involvement showed a statistically significant survival advantage compared to patients with more extensive spread. Considering the indications for node dissection we found a clear relationship among T category, grade and the probability of lymph node invasion. Patients with stage T1 tumors and stage T2, grades 1 and 2 tumors presented significantly less often with lymphatic invasion than those with other categories of disease and were less likely to have a regional recurrence after treatment of the primary tumor only. In these categories we recommend surveillance of the regional lymph nodes in patients who present with unsuspected nodes. However, patients with stage T2 grade 3, stage T3 and operable stage T4 tumors should undergo an immediate inguinal node dissection because of the high probability of clinically occult lymph node invasion (in our material more than 50%). With respect to the extent of the node dissection, we found that the likelihood of spread to the contralateral and/or pelvic regions was related to the number of invaded nodes in the inguinal region. We recommend contralateral node dissection and unilateral pelvic node dissection when 2 or more positive nodes are found in the dissected groin specimen. Primary pelvic node dissection should be performed in patients who present initially with cytologically or biopsy proved positive inguinal nodes.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Patients with only 1 or 2 inguinal lymph nodes involved without extracapsular growth and no poorly differentiated tumor within these nodes are at low risk of pelvic lymph node involvement and have a good prognosis with a 5-year survival rate of approximately 90%. Pelvic lymph node dissection seems to be unnecessary in these cases.

Metastatic inguinal lymph node extranodal extension and pelvic lymph node involvement are independent predictive parameters of cancer specific survival in patients with pathologically node positive penile carcinoma despite surgery with postoperative radiotherapy.

The treatment of the primary tumor in 110 patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the penis seen between 1956 and 1989 was reviewed. Small tumors had generally been treated by penis conserving methods, such as circumcision, local excision and external radiotherapy alone or after circumcision or local excision. Since 1982 we have used the neodymium:YAG laser as a penis conserving method. In 51 patients (46%) penis conserving treatment had been performed and 59 (54%) had undergone some form of amputation. Overall, 16 of 110 patients (15%) had local recurrence. The risk of local recurrence after penis conserving therapy was significantly related to T category, with 10% local recurrences in stage T1 tumors in contrast to 32% and 100% in stages T2 and T3 tumors, respectively. All of the recurrences in patients with stage T1 tumors were strictly local and all were salvaged. In our view penis conserving therapy is a safe procedure in patients with stage T1 tumors and should always be attempted first. Amputation is considered to be overtreatment in these cases. Of 6 recurrences in the conservatively treated stage T2 disease group 4 were strictly local. These were all well or moderately differentiated tumors, not exceeding 3.5 cm. in diameter. We suggest penile conservation for this subgroup of T2 tumors. However, partial amputation is recommended for poorly differentiated stage T2 tumors. Local failure was observed in all stage T3 tumors treated with external radiation. In general, penis conservation in stage T3 tumors should not be attempted with the treatment modalities available to date. Comparing the different methods of penis conservation, used in 49 stages T1 and T2 tumors, no difference in local recurrence rate (18%) was observed among surgery, laser and external beam radiation. In view of the low morbidity, cutting and coagulation properties and minimal tissue changes, use of the neodymium:YAG laser would be our first choice of treatment modality. Penile conservation should be attempted only when frequent and long lasting followup is guaranteed, since local recurrences can appear as late as 8 years after primary treatment.