Despite advances in the understanding and treatment of ischemic cardiomyopathy, characterized by extensive coronary artery disease and left ventricular (LV) dysfunction, the prognosis remains poor with only a 50-60% 5-year survival rate. The composition of atherosclerotic lesions is currently regarded as being more important than the degree of stenosis in determining acute events. If imaging techniques could distinguish vulnerable from stable plaques, then high-risk patient subgroups could be identified. Another important concept is that LV dysfunction may be the result of either scarring due to necrosis or to the presence of myocardial hibernation, in which there is sufficient blood flow to sustain viable myocytes, but insufficient to maintain systolic contraction. This concept of myocardial viability is critical for making optimal clinical management decisions. This review describes how noninvasive imaging methods can be used to distinguish regions of irreversibly injured myocardium from viable but hibernating segments. Technical advances in CT and MR have made imaging of the beating heart possible. Considerable clinical progress has already been made and further cardiac applications are expected. Radiologists therefore have new opportunities for involvement in cardiac imaging but must recognize the political implications as well as the diagnostic potential of these modalities not only for the heart, but also for the whole vascular system. This review focuses on imaging myocardial injury. It compares state-of-the-art CT and MR with more established yet contemporary echocardiography and nuclear scintigraphy.
A frequent concern during angioplasty is the possibility of occluding important side branches that originate in arterial stenoses subjected to balloon dilatation. The effect of dilatation on 93 side branches (greater than or equal to 1 mm in diameter) was evaluated in 86 patients undergoing percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) in whom those branches arose directly in dilated segments of the left anterior descending, circumflex, or right coronary arteries. Seventy-six of the 93 side branches had minor (less than 50%) narrowing at their origin. Among these side branches, nine (12%) were compromised by PTCA. Seventeen of the 93 side branches had greater than 50% ostial stenosis. Significantly more of these side branches (seven of seventeen, or 41%) were compromised by PTCA (P less than .01). Even when compromise does occur, it usually takes the form of increased stenosis rather than total occlusion. The presence of side branches originating in stenotic lesions is not a contraindication to PTCA since serious compromise of such branches rarely results from this procedure.
The original Gruentzig coaxial catheter system for percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) utilized a blunt, closed-end, inner balloon catheter with a short guide wire attached to its tip. Options for safely crossing severe stenoses with this large, nonmaneuverable catheter were limited. More recently, over-the-wire systems have been developed in which the lesion initially is crossed with a small-caliber floppy or steerable guide wire, then by the balloon catheter advanced over the wire. Technical success was achieved in 78 of our first 100 PTCAs with this system. Significant cardiac complications occurred in ten patients, seven of whom required emergency coronary bypass surgery. A recently published survey of all PTCA techniques reported a technical success rate of 62%. Our higher success rate may be attributed to certain advantages of the over-the-wire system, which are discussed in detail. A learning curve is associated with this procedure: our success rate was 65% in the first 20 cases but 81% thereafter. These results can be considered typical of those expected at hospitals now beginning PTCA programs with advanced over-the-wire technology.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations鈥揷itations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright 漏 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 馃挋 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.