Results We confirm the initially reported specificity and further narrow down its confidence interval (specificity 99.5%, 95% CI 99.4-99.6%), and show that this high specificity is valid across diverse patient categories. Here we demonstrate that differences in positive predictive values between patient categories reflect the prevalence of syphilis in these categories, and are not due to differences in specificity. In addition, in a sensitivity analysis we show that these conclusions are robust for several assumptions. Conclusion Our analysis shows that the high specificity found in the initial study, stands up after implementation in a population with a low syphilis prevalence (0.9%). Using a selected serum sample collection is therefore a valid manner in the evaluation of syphilis serological diagnostic assays. Confirmatory syphilis testing remains mandatory in low prevalence populations, even when the screening test has a very high specificity. Background Although syphilis and HIV are primarily transmitted through sexual intercourse, they can also be transmitted from mother to child during pregnancy or at delivery. Testing pregnant women for syphilis and HIV is an important public health measure to prevent vertical transmission. Several countries have included screening of pregnant women using rapid HIV testing, and recently also rapid syphilis testing. Screening pregnant women for both diseases with one test is not only desirable but could also be very convenient. We present the results of the laboratory-based evaluation of a new test: the SD Bioline HIV/Syphilis Duo. Methods We used archived serum specimens characterised as positive or negative for HIV and/or Syphilis. The gold standard positive for HIV was EIA (Vironostika ® HIV Uni-Form II Ag/Ab, bioMéri-eux) with confirmation using Western blot. The reference standard positive for syphilis was the Rapid Plasma Reagin test (RPR, bioMérieux) with confirmation using the Treponema pallidum Particle Agglutination (TPPA) assay (Fujireibio, Japan). Reference standard negatives were EIA negative and RPR negative for HIV and syphilis respectively. For Syphilis we used a total of 665 samples, including 198 positives, and for HIV we used 662 samples including 91 positives. There were 42 samples positive for both HIV and syphilis. The samples were tested with the SD Bioline HIV/Syphilis Duo by a laboratory technician blinded to the gold standard results. Results For Syphilis we observed a sensitivity of 100% (198/198) and a specificity of 99.57% (465/467). The two RPR negative/Bioline positive samples were negative for TPPA. For HIV, both the sensitivity and specificity were 100% (91/91 and 571/571 respectively). Conclusions The SD Bioline HIV/Syphilis Duo test has a good performance in archived sera. Its high sensitivity suggests that this dual test would be of use in screening programmes for syphilis and HIV. Evaluation of a DoublE
BackgroundCongenital syphilis produces miscarriage and severe complications in newborns. Rapid syphilis testing (RST, Syphilis 3.0 Bioline) was introduced in antenatal care and reproductive health services of 16 health centers at Ventanilla (Callao), Peru, aiming to improving access to syphilis screening and treatment in the first contact of pregnant women with professional midwives. We present the results of a quality control assessment evaluating internal (IQC) and external quality control (EQC) of such tests when performed by professional midwives.MethodsWe developed quality controls panels consisting of the Dried Tube Specimen (DTS). Open label positive and a negative control DTS were distributed as IQC bimonthly to services performing RST, to evaluate the test performance under the service storage conditions. Additionally, closed label controls (EQC) were distributed biyearly to evaluate the performance of each professional midwife performing RST. The ECC panel was composed of a weak positive, an intermediate and a strong positive DTS, as well as a negative DTS. Midwives were trained in DTS reconstitution, as well as result interpretation and recording.Results28 DTS panels were distributed for IQC (16 to antenatal and 3 to emergency services), with 100% concordance. 119 DTS panels were distributed as EQC, with 100% concordance observed in most (95%) of midwifes evaluated. Six midwives read the weak positive DTS as negative (75% concordance). These six professionals were retrained in their health centers. IQC and EQC were well accepted by midwifes, giving them a sense of confidence with their performance with the test.ConclusionExcellent IQC and EQC results were observed, with good acceptance of the evaluation by midwives.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.