Pain and symptoms related to palliative care (pain and palliative care [PPC]) are often undertreated. This is largely owing to the complexity in the provision of care and the potential discrepancy in education among the various health care professionals required to deliver care. Pharmacists are frequently involved in the care of PPC patients, although pharmacy education currently does not offer or require a strong curriculum commitment to this area of practice. The Strategic Planning Summit for the Advancement of Pain and Palliative Care Pharmacy was convened to address opportunities to improve the education of pharmacists and pharmacy students on PPC. Six working groups were charged with objectives to address barriers and opportunities in the areas of student and professional assessment, model curricula, postgraduate training, professional education, and credentialing. Consensus was reached among the working groups and presented to the Summit Advisory Board for adoption. These recommendations will provide guidance on improving the care provided to PPC patients by pharmacists through integrating education at all points along the professional education continuum.

Successful treatment of burn pain requires a multimodality approach. Although opioid agents are the mainstay, other nonopioid agents, such as anticonvulsants, are frequently employed for pain control, with unknown benefits. The authors sought to determine the efficacy of gabapentin in acute burn pain management. Patients admitted to the burn center with burns more than 5% total body surface area and expected length of stay more than 48 hours were randomized and prospectively enrolled in this double-blind, placebo-controlled study from February 2010 to September 2011. Drug escalation and titration were done by protocol. Pain was assessed by unit protocol with the Numeric Rating Scale. Neuropathic pain and anxiety were recorded at least biweekly. Psychosocial adjustment was assessed at follow-up. Opioid medications were converted to morphine equivalents. Differences between pain levels and opioid consumption were analyzed between groups with the Student's t-test and χ test, respectively. The study was designed to detect a difference of 22% in opioid use between the two study groups with an enrollment of 50 patients with α of 0.05 and β of 80%. P < .5 was considered significant. Fifty-three patients consented for the study and received the loading dose. Four patients withdrew. Both an intention-to-treat and actual treatment analysis were performed on all 53 patients. The placebo and drug populations were well matched for demographic variables, body surface area burned, and need for surgical intervention. The average length of stay was 11 ± 6.8 days and did not vary between groups. The study drug group received 10.8 ± 0.67 days of study drug, with eight patients receiving a dosage of 300 mg thrice daily (TID), 24 receiving 600 mg TID, 14 receiving 800 mg TID, and seven receiving 1200 mg TID. The incidence of neuropathic pain was 39% in the study drug arm and 38% in the placebo group. Neither pain scores (rest and procedural) nor opioid consumption differed between the groups. Forty-three patients (81.1%) were assessed at their first clinic visit. There was no difference in psychosocial functioning in either treatment group. In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, the use of gabapentin in acute burn pain management did not decrease pain scores or lessen opioid requirements. Further research into nonopioid alternatives for burn pain analgesia is needed.

No abstract

Tapering opioids is one of the most daunting dilemmas in clinical practice today. The decision to taper opioids is based on many factors, including a lack of efficacy, unacceptable risk, perioperative management, noncompliance, or patient preference. Tapering in the perioperative setting is quite common, though more complex in patients previously taking chronic opioid therapy. Outside of a medical emergency, opioid tapers are best managed in an outpatient setting, allowing for adjustments and more long-term nonopioid pain management, if necessary. No single strategy can be applied to all patients, and very few published guidelines are available for reference. Dose reductions and schedules are highly variable across available guidelines and literature. Dose reductions range from 10% to 50%, with a frequency ranging from daily reductions to every 2 weeks. Most guidelines address the concern of preventing physical withdrawal symptoms; however, few address the psychological ramifications of tapering. Individualized regimens and a willingness to adjust schedules and doses allows for improved patient comfort. The goal is to complete tapering without any symptoms of withdrawal; however, this is not always possible. Several available agents may help ameliorate these symptoms, including antihypertensives, antihistamines, antiemetics, antidepressants, anticonvulsants, and antipsychotics. Opioid tapering is rarely easy but should be a manageable process.

No abstract