Abstract. The origin of multiple energetic particle injections into the inner magnetosphere is addressed using a rare opportunity of measuring the energetic particle fluxes at different radial distances under known electric and magnetic fields. During a strong substorm on February 10, 1991, the CRRES spacecraft measured E and B fields and high-energy particle fluxes near the magnetic equator at r •-5 Re, whereas particle injections, their azimuthal locations, and some other parameters were simultaneously monitored by three geostationary spacecraft and ground networks. We show a multitude of impulsive short-duration injection events which correlate with 1-2 rain long pulses of dawn-dusk electric field. The observations suggest that some E field pulses recorded deep in the inner magnetosphere were fast magnetosonic waves radiated by the current disruption region. This supports the concept of impulsive dissipation event as an elementary building block of substorm expansion. Furthermore, our modeling results indicate that most of the flux variations of energetic particles can be explained by the global convective transport and corresponding particle acceleration. However, we emphasize that, depending on particle spectra and r•dial flux gradient, one can observe either flux increase, or decrease, or no variation (often seen in different energy ranges simultaneously and at the same point) as a response to the electric field pulse. Both the cloud of injected particles and magnetic field dipolarization region had a sharp inner boundary (injection front) which propagated inward at the convection speed. We document the complicatad structure of this front, consisting of a diamagnetic hot proton layer followed by the dipolarization front which contains enhanced energetic electron fluxes. Further study is required to understand how common this structure is and, if common, how it may be formed.

Abstract. We present a comprehensive study of a sequence of two substorms and multiple pseudobreakups using optical, magnetic and incoherent scatter radar measurements, energetic particles from two geosynchronous satellites and particle and field data from the Geotail spacecraft located at Xasm • -86 Re. Following conventional nomenclature, we classified as pseudobreakups those auroral breakups which did not exhibit significant poleward expansion (< 2 ø magnetic latitude).Auroral intensifications following substorm breakups were also observed, and were classified separately. Pseudobreakups were found not to differ from substorm breakups in longitudinal extent (from 1.3 to 6.1 hours of magnetic local time), or in duration (from 5 to 16 minutes). In general, the ionospheric currents producing ground magnetic disturbances were more intense during substorms than pseudobreakups. We found that pseudobreakups are associated with the same magnetospheric processes as substorm breakups which involve current wedge formation, midlatitude magnetic Pi2 pulsations and energetic particle injections at the geosynchronous altitude. Moreover, pseudobreakups are associated with magnetic reconnection in the near-Earth region, evidenced by the typical subsequent detection of a plasmoid at Geotail. This implies that the magnetotail volume influenced by a pseudobreakup is qui•e large in radial distance. We conclude that there is no definitive qualitative distinction between pseudobreakups and substorms but there is a continuum of states between the small pseudobreakups and large substorms.

Optical images of the auroral bulge as seen by the Viking UV imager were compared in several cases with the substorm current wedge (SCW) upward and downward field‐aligned currents (FAC) whose positions were determined using the inversion algorithm based on the substorm‐related magnetic variations observed at midlatitudes. With reasonable accuracy (better than 0.5 hours MLT) the estimated longitudes of the upward FAC generally pointed to the surge or to the brightest luminousity region in the western half of the bulge. The latter feature may imply a more complicated structure of the net FACs than can be described by the simple substorm current wedge scheme. Similarly, the estimated positions of the downward FAC pointed close to the eastern termination of the bulge. The associated optical signatures of this current system ranged from the well‐defined emission depletion regions to new auroral intensifications. The downward current appears to correspond in some cases at least with the division between the morning sector portion of the double oval and the nightside portion connected more directly to the substorm bulge. The results in general confirm the expected association between the auroral bulge and the SCW, as well as showing a reasonably good results from the inversion algorithm based on midlatitude magnetic observations. Our results, however, also indicate that one must be careful in interpreting the apparent motion of SCW‐related field‐aligned currents inferred from midlatitude observations in terms of a true westward or eastward expansion of the SCW or of the auroral bulge. The observed changes may instead sometimes be related to the redistribution of the net FACs within than a shift or expansion of the simple current system.

No abstract