From a theoretical point of view, orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) should be considered the ideal therapeutic option for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).This neoplasm usually appears in the setting of liver cirrhosis, 1,2 and thus, OLT would eliminate the tumor and the oncogenic underlying liver. However, the first series of OLT for HCC showed disappointing results. [3][4][5][6] The inclusion of patients with advanced HCC prompted a high recurrence rate (higher than 50% at 3 years) whereas the survival rate (20%-50% at 5 years) was clearly less than that of non-HCC patients. Subsequent reports showed that HCC stage is a key point in determining the success of OLT in these patients and suggested that patients with early HCC could benefit from OLT both in terms of recurrence and survival. 5,7-10 Thereby, the recurrence rate of patients with incidental tumors which were discovered at the time of the pathological examination of the explanted liver is negligible. 3,7 Finally, two recent studies have shown that if OLT is restricted only to patients with early HCC (some years ago these tumors would have been identified only in the explanted livers), the risk of recurrence is minimal and the survival is identical to that of patients without HCC. 11,12 These encouraging data would favor OLT as the first therapeutic option to be considered in patients with HCC 13 as surgical resection is hampered by a higher recurrence rate during follow up [14][15][16][17] ; however, OLT is a highly invasive procedure with potentially severe complications in the early, medium, and long-term follow up. In addition, it must be stressed that HCC in most of the patients arises on liver cirrhosis caused by infection with HBV or HCV, 2,18 which frequently infects the graft, 19,20 and that the progression of the liver disease may be faster than in immunologically competent individuals. 21 As previously reported, 22-25 the treatment schedule applied in our Liver Unit in patients with HCC considered OLT only for those patients with solitary tumors smaller than 5 cm in whom resection was contraindicated, whereas the stage according to the TNM staging system was not taken into account. The present study analyzes the outcome of the cohort of the first 58 HCC patients submitted to OLT following this pre-established treatment algorithm, describing the accuracy of the preoperative staging, the recurrence and survival data, and also the rate of viral infection of the new liver. PATIENTS AND METHODS PatientsBetween January 1989 and December 1995, 877 patients with HCC were diagnosed, staged, and treated in our Liver Unit according to a previously published schedule. [22][23][24][25] Patients with HCC were Abbreviations: HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma; OLT, orthotopic liver transplantation; TNM, tumor-node-metastasis classification system; pTNM, pathological tumor-nodemetastasis classification.From the

The authors examined the impact of the laparoscopic approach on the early outcome of resected colon carcinomas. The role of laparoscopic techniques in the treatment of colon carcinomas is questionable. Previous studies have suggested technical feasibility of surgical resections of these cancers by laparoscopic means and have implied a benefit to laparoscopic technique for patients undergoing colorectal resections. A prospective, randomized study was conducted comparing laparoscopic assisted colectomy (LAC) open colectomy (OC) for colon cancer. We present the preliminary results in relation to the short-term outcome and judge the feasibility of the laparoscopic procedure to as a way of performing accurate oncologic resection and staging. Benefit has been demonstrated with LAC in this setting. Passing flatus, oral intake, and discharge from hospital occurred earlier in LAC- than OC-treated patients. The mean operative time was significantly longer in the LAC group than in the OC group. The overall morbidity was significantly lower in the LAC group. No significant differences were observed between both groups in the number of lymph nodes removed or the pathological stage following the Astler-Coller modification of the Dukes classification. The laparoscopic approach improves the short-term outcome of segmental colectomies for colon cancer. However, the further follow-up of these patients will allow us to answer in the near future whether or not the LAC may influence the long-term outcome.

The laparoscopic approach has a recurrence rate similar to that for open procedures for colon cancer. However, additional follow-up of these patients is needed before we can determine whether or not the laparoscopic approach influences overall survival.

We suggest that with the development of improved technical devices and more experience, the indications for laparoscopic colectomy should continue to expand. The low incidence of infectious complications suggests an important role for the laparoscopic approach to colorectal surgery.

Massive ascites after liver transplantation, although uncommon, usually represents a serious adverse event. The pathogenesis of this complication has not been adequately investigated. To determine the incidence, characteristics, and pathogenic factors of massive ascites after liver transplantation (ascitic fluid > 500 mL/d for >10 days), the charts of 378 liver transplant recipients were reviewed. Massive ascites occurred in 25 patients (7%). Mean ascitic fluid production was 960 mL/d (range, 625 to 2,350 mL/d), and the duration of ascites was 77 days (range, 15 to 223 days). The ascitic fluid had a high protein content (36 +/- 7 g/L; range, 25 to 50 g/L). When patients who did and did not develop massive ascites were compared, significant differences were found in receptor sex (men, 88% v 60%, respectively; P <.01) and surgical technique (inferior vena cava preservation with piggyback technique, 72% v 41%; P <.01). Significantly increased wedged and free hepatic venous pressures and gradients between hepatic vein and right atrial pressures were found in patients who developed ascites, suggesting a difficulty in graft blood outflow. Massive ascites was associated with renal impairment, increased incidence of abdominal infection, prolonged hospitalization, and a tendency toward reduced survival. In conclusion, massive ascites after liver transplantation is relatively uncommon but associated with increased morbidity and mortality and is predominantly related to difficulties of hepatic venous drainage. Measurement of hepatic vein and atrial pressures to detect a significant gradient and correct possible alterations in hepatic vein outflow should be the first approach in the management of these patients.

Primary pulmonary hypertension (PPH) in patients with hepatic cirrhosis is often considered an unacceptable condition for liver transplantation because of increased morbidity and mortality during the procedure. We studied the incidence, characteristics, and final outcome of patients with PPH undergoing liver transplantation in our institution. Among the 226 patients undergoing 257 liver transplantations, eight (3.5%) fulfilled the conditions of PPH and responded to vasodilator therapy. Nitroglycerin 1.5 micrograms/kg produced a decrease in pulmonary vascular resistance index (PVRI) and mean pulmonary arterial pressure (MPAP) of 20% and 15%, respectively. Patients with PPH when compared with a matched group of patients without PPH had markedly increased hemodynamic changes in PVRI (P = 0.004) and MPAP (P = 0.0001) during and after the procedure. All patients with PPH required pulmonary vasodilator therapy after reperfusion of the new liver, while none in the group of patients without PPH required this therapy. Furthermore, after graft reperfusion, patients with PPH in which venovenous bypass was not used (n = 3), had a more compromised right ventricular function with a greater increase of central venous pressure (CVP) (90%) and MPAP (140%) when compared with patients with bypass or preservation of the recipient's vena cava (n = 5) in whom the increase of CVP and MPAP was 50% and 60%, respectively. Moderate PPH without a fixed level of pulmonary hypertension in patients undergoing liver transplantation is not related to an adverse outcome.

The results suggest that normal esophageal motility deteriorates with advancing age. Thus, age-related normality limits of esophageal pressures should be considered before establishing the manometric diagnosis of hypercontractile esophageal motility disorders.

Liver cirrhosis is considered a contraindication to laparoscopic cholecystectomy for the moment. Here we are reporting on results in the surgical treatment of gallstone disease in cirrhotic patients by laparoscopic means. We reviewed the experience over the final period of time in 11 patients since the introduction of laparoscopic procedures in our unit. The index of conversion rate was 9.1% (1/11). The morbidity was nil. The average length of hospital stay was 1.8 days (1-6 days). We propose the use of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in gallstone disease in patients with liver cirrhosis as first-line surgical treatment.